Tag: Withheld Evidence

  • The Page They Pulled From Oswald’s Notes

    The Page They Pulled From Oswald’s Notes

    Buried in document 206-10001-10009, declassified in 2025, is a low-profile but explosive reference to an internal memo describing a page “of cryptic personal notations” found among Oswald’s possessions after his arrest.

    This page, which allegedly contained references to numerical patterns and place names, was removed from his personal effects file before any official review panel-including the Warren Commission-ever saw it.


    📖 What The Memo Says

    The memo, labeled “SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE HOLD – OSWALD EFFECTS”, describes a single sheet of unlined paper bearing the following:

    • Several longhand sequences of numbers (some resembling phone codes or cipher fragments)
    • A list of four locations-three domestic, one international (redacted)
    • A single name: “Schmidt” (crossed out)

    The summary concludes:

    “Linguistic analyst suggests notations consistent with travel planning or task coordination. Context unclear.”


    🚫 Why Wasn’t It Shared?

    The same memo includes a routing slip from the Office of Security with this handwritten instruction:

    “Remove page 5 from effects folder prior to external review. Archive under TSS/CI for controlled access.”

    That page was not included in the material sent to the FBI or Warren Commission.

    And it hasn’t been seen publicly until this document’s declassification in 2025.


    🕵️‍♂️ What Was “Page 5”?

    It’s referred to several times simply as “Page 5” - presumed to be from a cheap spiral notebook found in Oswald’s room. According to the file inventory, pages 1–4 were released, containing typical musings, scribbles, and basic names.

    But “Page 5” was marked:

    “Unusual construction. Graphite pressure variation suggests different emotional state than surrounding pages.”

    In short: the handwriting changed. And the content was… not normal.


    ✉️ What Did Oswald Write?

    Because the page itself isn’t reproduced in the 2025 release, we only have the analysis summary to go by. But this line stands out:

    “List includes Dallas, New Orleans, Miami, and [REDACTED]. Notable allusion to ‘corridor drop before contact.’”

    “Corridor drop” was a term used in CIA communications to describe passive data transfer - such as leaving a note or object in a public space for pickup.


    🔐 Why It Was Buried

    The memo’s final paragraph reads:

    “Due to potential for interpretive misalignment and external speculation, recommend this page remain under internal CI review pending further material correlation.”

    In plain language: they didn’t want anyone to run wild with theories. So they kept it out of every investigation.

    Until now.


    🧨 Oswald May Have Left A Clue They Didn’t Want Interpreted

    This wasn’t a manifesto.

    It wasn’t a confession.

    It was something stranger: a coded, disconnected list of locations and movements. Possibly mundane. Possibly coordinated.

    We don’t know.

    Because they decided we shouldn’t.

  • The Letter Hoover Buried After It Named Oswald

    The Letter Hoover Buried After It Named Oswald

    In a 2025 file dump, a long-rumored but never-before-seen memo was unearthed - a personal note sent to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover just four days before JFK was killed.

    It came from inside Dallas. It named Oswald. And it was never acted on.


    🧾 “A Troubling Letter - Unverified but Specific”

    The document is a one-page memo labeled “DALLAS CORRESPONDENCE, NOV 18, 1963.”

    It summarizes a handwritten letter received by Hoover’s office from a “concerned ex-agent in the Dallas field office,” warning of:

    “A man named Oswald, agitated, recently seen with known Cuban sympathizers. May attempt high-profile disruption if motorcade route is unchanged.”

    The warning included a physical description, address, and mention of a recent trip to Mexico City.


    🗃️ Where the Letter Went

    According to the routing log, the memo was marked “non-critical” by Hoover’s executive assistant and filed under “miscellaneous chatter.”

    The letter was never passed to the Secret Service.

    It was never forwarded to Dallas PD.

    It was never even scanned.

    Instead, it was stamped “DO NOT REPRODUCE” and sealed in a restricted internal archive - unlisted until the 2025 review board accidentally uncovered it.


    🧍‍♂️ Who Wrote It?

    The sender remains redacted in the 2025 release - but a misfiled HR document in the same folder gives a clue.

    It mentions a retired agent named James C. Brandt, who left the FBI in 1962 after internal friction with Dallas station leadership.

    He had worked Latin American assignments.

    He had once surveilled Oswald’s movements in New Orleans.

    He knew the name.

    And he tried to say something.


    🕳️ The Letter That Could’ve Changed Everything

    This wasn’t a random tip.

    It was direct.

    Detailed.

    And days ahead of the motorcade.

    Why wasn’t it passed on?

    Because, as the 2025 margin note reads:

    “Subject’s credibility was internally debated. HQ decision was to sit tight unless follow-up emerged.”

    None did.

    Because Brandt was never contacted again.


    🧨 They Were Warned. They Filed It Anyway.

    There was a letter.

    It named Oswald.

    It described the threat.

    It wasn’t lost.

    It was buried.