thejfkfiles.com

Tag: JFK Files 2025

  • The Oswald Passport Application That Was Never Logged

    The Oswald Passport Application That Was Never Logged

    One of the most overlooked documents in the 2025 files is a blank passport application found in Oswald’s New Orleans file - stamped approved with no signature and no travel record. The destination was redacted. The date was October 1963.

    🧾 A Passport With No Owner

    The newly declassified FBI file titled “LHO–NO–TRVL” includes a photocopy of an unsigned passport application with an approval stamp dated October 3, 1963 - the same week Oswald was allegedly preparing his trip to Mexico.

    The problem? His official passport had already been issued two years earlier.

    This one had a different ID number.

    No photo attached.

    And no record of cancellation.

    📍 The Redacted Destination

    The most heavily blacked-out portion of the document is the destination box. But a routing slip attached to the file lists one legible keyword: “Caracas.”

    Why would Oswald - or someone using his identity - have a travel document approved to Venezuela just weeks before the assassination?

    And why wasn’t it logged by State?

    🗃️ Internal Alarm That Went Nowhere

    A 1964 interoffice CIA memo now made public refers to the passport as “unauthorized parallel documentation.”

    Another line states:

    “Appears to have been issued through private contact within Agency field team.”

    The note ends with:

    “Item not helpful to Commission proceedings. File separate.”

    Translation: it was real, it was flagged, and it was suppressed.

    🕴️ False Identity Or Quiet Extraction?

    The CIA memo raises one final, chilling theory - handwritten in the margins:

    “Check MEX-CUB asset crossover. Possible double op.”

    It’s the only surviving note linking the rogue passport to the possibility of a second Oswald - or a planned exit route that never came.

    📦 The Paper Trail Led Out Of Dallas

    The official record shows Oswald never left the country after Mexico City.

    This document suggests someone planned for him to.

    Or for someone else using his name.

    And in 1963, that was enough to get a passport.

  • The Burn Bag Memo: What the CIA Destroyed in March 1964

    The Burn Bag Memo: What the CIA Destroyed in March 1964

    A newly surfaced internal directive, dated March 1964, confirms what many suspected but couldn’t prove: documents related to Oswald’s overseas contacts were destroyed - not archived. The directive came from inside Langley. And it was signed.

    🔥 Operation: Disposal 4

    The 2025 release includes a CIA memorandum titled “DISPOSAL 4 – Post-Commission Streamlining.”

    Inside it: instructions to “reduce operational clutter” by removing “non-essential foreign correspondence related to L.H.O. and Latin America-based sources.”

    One sentence is underlined:

    “All materials flagged for non-retention are to be burn-bagged under DO/CI authority.”

    This was four months before the Warren Commission completed its report.

    🧳 The Guatemala File

    A referenced attachment - still missing - was labeled: “LHO–GTM EXFIL LEAD.”

    GTM = Guatemala.

    Exfil = Extraction or attempted extraction.

    According to the memo’s routing slip, the file was flagged as “non-retainable.”

    We don’t know what it contained.

    We know they burned it.

    📬 Mail That Vanished

    Another included item: a destroyed packet of foreign mail intercepts from 1962–1963, addressed to Oswald from Mexico City, Havana, and one location blacked out.

    The packet was logged in early ’64. Its burn authorization came just days later.

    Quote:

    “Contents do not align with official biographic narrative.”

    That narrative, of course, is that Oswald was acting alone.

    🧯 Damage Control Disguised as Housekeeping

    The memo claims these actions were “routine housekeeping,” but a 2025 margin note added by the Review Board contradicts that:

    “This burn list included at least one active field file. Destruction was preemptive.”

    Not archival cleanup.

    Erasure.

    🧨 They Didn’t Just Hide It. They Lit the Match.

    The 2025 release confirms what skeptics have argued for decades:

    They didn’t lose the story.

    They deleted the parts that didn’t fit.

  • The Silenced Informant: Who Tried to Warn the FBI?

    The Silenced Informant: Who Tried to Warn the FBI?

    Buried deep in the 2025 JFK files is a classified witness report - one that never made it to the Warren Commission. A low-level informant with ties to organized crime had information days before the assassination. He made a call. And then he disappeared.

    📞 The November 20th Tip-Off

    In a newly declassified FBI tip-line transcript labeled “INTAKE DALLAS-1120-A”, a man claiming to be an “associate of associates” warned of a plan involving “a shooter, a diversion, and a backup.”

    He mentioned Dealey Plaza by name.

    The FBI dispatcher, according to the form, “marked as possible hoax.” The call was never escalated.

    The voice was never traced. Until now.

    🧾 The Name That Didn’t Vanish

    Attached to the call summary was an FBI field memo referencing a man named Raymond Paoletti - a known courier for Carlos Marcello’s organization.

    Paoletti’s name had been redacted in all known releases until now. The 2025 version included an error: his name was visible on the routing slip.

    That same memo showed he was detained for “questioning” on November 21. But there’s no release record. No interview notes. No mention in any Warren Commission documents.

    🧍‍♂️ A Ghost in the System

    A second document - an internal FBI log - notes:

    “Subject Paoletti held at sub-office 4. No formal charge filed. Do not add to master.”

    Sub-office 4? Never officially existed.

    And Paoletti? Never heard from again. His family filed a missing person report in 1964, which was closed after 30 days “due to lack of federal interest.”

    ❌ The Pattern of Silence

    This wasn’t the only case.

    The 2025 files include four more examples of informant tips that were marked “inconclusive” and shelved - each one tied to either the mob, the CIA, or the embassies Oswald visited.

    The informants all went missing within a year.

    📌 They Tried to Speak. The System Made Sure They Couldn’t.

    The truth isn’t just in what the files say - it’s in what happened to the people who tried to speak up.

    In 1963, information didn’t vanish.

    People did.

  • The Mexico City Files: The Days Oswald Disappeared

    The Mexico City Files: The Days Oswald Disappeared

    The 2025 CIA declassifications finally expose the truth: Oswald didn’t just visit Mexico City. He maneuvered through it - shadowed, recorded, and erased.

    🏛️ The Embassy Runaround

    Lee Harvey Oswald arrived in Mexico City on September 27, 1963. Within days, he had visited both the Cuban and Soviet embassies - not once, but repeatedly.

    The 2025 files reveal transcripts of tapped embassy phone lines. In one, Oswald demands to speak to “Comrade Kostikov,” a Soviet official tied to Department 13 - the sabotage and assassination division.

    That name was never included in the official Warren Report.

    🎙️ The Tape They Buried

    The CIA’s Mexico City station recorded almost everything - except, apparently, Oswald’s calls. For years, the tapes were “lost.”

    Until 2025.

    One transcript reveals a caller identifying himself as “Oswald,” asking for travel to Cuba and Russia, saying:

    “I was told to check in. It’s all in motion.”

    A memo flagged the voice as “inconsistent with known recordings.” It was archived under “Do Not Pursue.”

    📸 Wrong Man, Right Time

    The only supposed photo of Oswald entering the Soviet Embassy? Doesn’t match.

    An internal agency note, now declassified, reads:

    “Negative ID match. Resemblance unclear. Don’t escalate.”

    That analyst was reassigned two weeks later. His name never appears again in internal records.

    🧾 Hoover’s Quiet Shutdown

    A final cable, sent from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s office, sealed the deal:

    “This narrative undermines Commission cohesion. Archive and close.”

    The CIA obliged.

    🎯 They Watched Him Walk In. Then Cut the Film.

    For 60 years, Oswald’s Mexico visit was treated as a footnote. These new documents turn it into a headline.

    The truth wasn’t just ignored - it was blacked out.

  • “He Was Neurotic… Undesirable”: The KGB’s Unsolicited Denial

    “He Was Neurotic… Undesirable”: The KGB’s Unsolicited Denial

    In the weeks following JFK’s assassination, Soviet officials scrambled to shape the narrative.

    Document 180-10144-10133, newly released in the 2025 JFK files, captures an urgent and defensive communication: the KGB emphatically insisted that Lee Harvey Oswald was not trusted, welcomed, or encouraged during his time in the USSR.

    To American ears, the denial sounded rehearsed. To historians, it now sounds like damage control.​

    🧾 “He Was Neurotic… Undesirable”

    The document summarizes a Soviet briefing delivered via confidential diplomatic channels. In it, the KGB made a clear claim: Oswald was mentally unstable, socially isolated, and a political liability. He wasn’t the kind of defector they wanted.​

    “He was not a Soviet agent. He was considered unstable and undesirable. We had no interest in him.”​

    That may be true. But the timing of the statement-days after the assassination-raises more questions than it answers.​

    🧱 A Wall of Denial

    The KGB didn’t just distance themselves. They rewrote the story. In their version, Oswald was an annoying guest-barely tolerated, never trusted, and certainly not deployed.

    Their language paints a picture of a lone, erratic man wandering through Minsk with no support.​

    But this document isn’t an analysis. It’s an alibi.​

    ❗ Truth or Tactic?

    Whether the KGB was being honest or strategic is still unclear. What is clear is that this memo is less about information and more about reputation.

    The Soviets feared being tied to Kennedy’s murder-and this document shows just how fast they moved to sever any connection.​

    That urgency may speak volumes.

  • The Call To The Soviet Embassy That Made Langley Flinch

    The Call To The Soviet Embassy That Made Langley Flinch

    In document 206-10001-10014, declassified in March 2025, the CIA confirms it was operating a “passive intercept device” on a direct phone line to the Soviet Mission to the UN in New York City.

    What wasn’t expected?

    That the call logged on November 19, 1963 - just three days before the assassination - came from someone inside the United States, speaking fluent Russian, asking about “arrangements in Dallas.”

    ☎️ The Call No One Could Explain

    The document is a briefing note from the Office of Security to the CIA Deputy Director of Plans, summarizing a flagged phone intercept from a monitored UN communication circuit.

    Here’s the redacted transcription of the key line:

    “Will everything be prepared by the 22nd? I was told it would be handled in Dallas.”

    The speaker used fluent Russian, but with what linguists described as an East Coast American accent.

    The note goes on:

    “Caller requested assurance that event would be completed in accordance with earlier arrangements. Used informal vocabulary inconsistent with embassy protocol.”

    🛑 Who Was On The Line?

    The Soviets never responded to the call.

    That fact is what triggered the alarm.

    If this was a planned call between collaborators - where was the reply?

    A CIA linguistic analyst theorized:

    “Caller may have been attempting provocation or signal test.”

    That line - “signal test” - appears four times in the memo, suggesting fear that the Soviets were either:

    1. Running a backchannel warning, or
    2. Being set up by a third party to take the fall.

    🧾 The Mole Hunt That Followed

    Two immediate actions were taken after the intercept:

    1. A request to FBI counterintelligence to check if “any cleared domestic parties had access to Russian-linguist training and Dallas itinerary details.”
    2. A review of NSA logs for similar phrasing patterns or matching call fingerprints.

    Neither search returned a match.

    But on November 23, 1963 - the day after JFK was assassinated - a CIA internal routing slip recommended:

    “No further inquiry. Treat as anomalous and unconnected unless supporting intercepts surface.”

    Just like that - the call disappeared from the investigation trail.

    🎯 A Test Call Or A False Flag?

    The biggest clue is buried in a footnote in the document:

    “Analyst suggests caller may have been testing Soviet awareness or staging a signal to be noticed by U.S. monitoring.”

    In short: someone may have known the CIA was listening - and called the Soviet embassy on purpose, with deliberate phrasing about Dallas.

    Which raises one unavoidable question:

    Who knew enough to say it - and smart enough to make it untraceable?

    🧨 They Tapped The Line But Ignored The Message

    The CIA caught the call.

    They transcribed it.

    They flagged it internally.

    And then… chose not to follow it.

  • The European Propaganda Project They Swore Never Existed

    The European Propaganda Project They Swore Never Existed

    In March 2025, the National Archives released document 206-10001-10017 - a CIA cable chain revealing a previously unknown Cold War propaganda campaign, run from Frankfurt, Germany, targeting European media coverage of President Kennedy’s assassination.

    The objective was simple: discredit early conspiracy theories before they reached American shores.

    📰 The Frankfurt Office That Rewrote the Headlines

    The newly declassified file contains internal CIA cables from January–March 1964, routed from the Frankfurt station chief to Langley. The directive?

    “Request deployment of vetted materials to neutralize ongoing press speculation in French, Italian, and Dutch publications.”

    The file references coordinated contact with at least three European journalists who were supplied with tailored “talking points,” including early framing of Oswald as a “disaffected Marxist,” and warning against “false flag narratives gaining traction in post-Gaullist French circles.”

    📣 Operation CAPRICORN

    One cable reveals the internal codename: CAPRICORN - defined as a “limited European press guidance campaign” tied to “post-Dallas diplomatic stability.”

    “Capricorn asset G-7N filed acceptable phrasing via Corriere della Sera weekend edition. Request same applied to Belgian market.”

    A side note from a Langley handler suggests concern that Italian press had “veered toward Soviet implications,” and needed “course correction via diplomatic backchannel.”

    🧾 Targeted Media Manipulation

    CAPRICORN focused primarily on neutral or U.S.-aligned press outlets, especially in:

    • Italy (Milan & Rome bureaus)
    • The Netherlands (Dutch wire services)
    • West Germany (Frankfurter Allgemeine and local broadcasters)

    CIA cables show reimbursement records tied to stringers and “friendly editors,” though most names remain redacted.

    One summary line from February 1964 stands out:

    “Narrative stabilized in print. Continue monitoring radio.”

    This aligns with a later, post-Watergate internal review noting:

    “Legacy of CAPRICORN remains isolated to print. No repeat in radio archive suggests effective cordon.”

    ✉️ A Memo They Thought Was Lost

    An attached note, found stapled to the back of one cable, appears to be an unsigned internal warning, typed in Courier:

    “This project must be considered perishable. Any overt link to USIA or official embassy press releases risks escalation.”

    “Destroy all CAPRICORN print dockets not already reduced to cable summary.”

    Yet, somehow, this packet survived.

    🔍 Why It Matters Now

    This isn’t about whether Oswald acted alone.
    This is about how fast the official story was exported - and how aggressively the CIA moved to control the global narrative.

    CAPRICORN was never disclosed during the Church Committee hearings.
    It was never cited in the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) records.
    Its existence directly contradicts repeated CIA denials about post-assassination media influence outside the U.S.

    And now it’s sitting in a government archive.

  • Feature: The Man Who Told The CIA To Erase The Tape

    Feature: The Man Who Told The CIA To Erase The Tape

    In the 2025 declassified files, one name keeps reappearing - not in the major reports, but in the margins, on routing slips, and in audio review logs.

    His name is Gerald D. Roland.

    He was a CIA audio analyst stationed at the National Photographic Interpretation Center.

    And according to the files, he ordered the final erasure of a 20-minute reel of Air Force One communications on November 22, 1963.

    📼 The Tape That Went Missing Before The Funeral

    The 2025 files include for the first time a complete inventory list from NPIC (National Photographic Interpretation Center) dated November 23, 1963.

    Item #114 is described as:

    “AF1-TRANSIT COMPOSITE // Cut Reels A/B // 47 mins reduced to 27.”

    The log shows two edits, both labeled “audibility improvement.”

    But attached to the sheet is a slip initialed G.D.R.

    “Segments not suitable for archival. Final erasure authorized 2:43 PM EST.”

    That timing is critical - because at 2:43 PM, JFK’s body had not yet reached Capitol Hill for public display.

    🎧 Who Was Gerald D. Roland?

    According to a long-suppressed internal CIA personnel profile - now released - Roland was a signal specialist embedded at NPIC during 1962–1965, handling high-level audio scrubs for global operations.

    His 201 file (personnel record) shows multiple assignments involving U-2 flight audio and intercepts from Vietnam and Cuba.

    He wasn’t a tape tech.

    He was a gatekeeper.

    His file was excluded from both the Church Committee and the House Select Committee on Assassinations reviews.

    Why?

    The 2025 marginalia note reads:

    “Contractor not under review jurisdiction.”

    🗣️ What Was On The Deleted Segment?

    This is where it gets strange.

    A newly released memo from WHCA (White House Communications Agency), buried in a box labeled “ARLINGTON-MISC-TS”, describes a 17-minute section of the Air Force One recording that allegedly includes a “non-scheduled patch-through call.”

    The origin: Andrews Air Force Base Command Room.

    The destination: an unnamed Cabinet member en route back from Asia.

    The call contains:

    “Reference to pre-known risk level at Dallas location, and uncertainty about coordination between federal agencies and local detail.”

    WHCA marked the call as “unusable due to transmission quality.”

    But the audio quality note is crossed out and replaced with:

    “Delete per GDR/NPIC.”

    🚫 The Last Tape Wasn’t Archived - It Was Killed

    The CIA has long denied involvement in any editing of the Air Force One audio.

    But Roland’s name - never public until now - appears on the deletion approval.

    His record shows he was transferred to a satellite monitoring post in Arizona six months later.

    He retired in 1975.

    No interviews. No depositions.

    No mention in any major assassination review.

    Until now.

    🧩 Why This Matters

    📌 The deleted call references a “known risk” to JFK in Dallas.
    📌 The edit was performed by a CIA officer - not a WHCA technician.
    📌 The directive came before JFK’s body was even on display.
    📌 The only reason we know any of this: a routing slip in a box marked “Audio-Unverified/Non-Critical.”

    “No further duplication to be made. Source recording permanently removed.”
    - Note initialed: GDR, 11/23/63

    🧨 They Didn’t Just Edit The Tape They Deleted A Warning

    And for 60 years, nobody asked about Gerald D. Roland.

    Now the files do.

  • The Letter Hoover Buried After It Named Oswald

    The Letter Hoover Buried After It Named Oswald

    In a 2025 file dump, a long-rumored but never-before-seen memo was unearthed - a personal note sent to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover just four days before JFK was killed.

    It came from inside Dallas. It named Oswald. And it was never acted on.

    🧾 “A Troubling Letter - Unverified but Specific”

    The document is a one-page memo labeled “DALLAS CORRESPONDENCE, NOV 18, 1963.”

    It summarizes a handwritten letter received by Hoover’s office from a “concerned ex-agent in the Dallas field office,” warning of:

    “A man named Oswald, agitated, recently seen with known Cuban sympathizers. May attempt high-profile disruption if motorcade route is unchanged.”

    The warning included a physical description, address, and mention of a recent trip to Mexico City.

    🗃️ Where the Letter Went

    According to the routing log, the memo was marked “non-critical” by Hoover’s executive assistant and filed under “miscellaneous chatter.”

    The letter was never passed to the Secret Service.

    It was never forwarded to Dallas PD.

    It was never even scanned.

    Instead, it was stamped “DO NOT REPRODUCE” and sealed in a restricted internal archive - unlisted until the 2025 review board accidentally uncovered it.

    🧍‍♂️ Who Wrote It?

    The sender remains redacted in the 2025 release - but a misfiled HR document in the same folder gives a clue.

    It mentions a retired agent named James C. Brandt, who left the FBI in 1962 after internal friction with Dallas station leadership.

    He had worked Latin American assignments.

    He had once surveilled Oswald’s movements in New Orleans.

    He knew the name.

    And he tried to say something.

    🕳️ The Letter That Could’ve Changed Everything

    This wasn’t a random tip.

    It was direct.

    Detailed.

    And days ahead of the motorcade.

    Why wasn’t it passed on?

    Because, as the 2025 margin note reads:

    “Subject’s credibility was internally debated. HQ decision was to sit tight unless follow-up emerged.”

    None did.

    Because Brandt was never contacted again.

    🧨 They Were Warned. They Filed It Anyway.

    There was a letter.

    It named Oswald.

    It described the threat.

    It wasn’t lost.

    It was buried.