thejfkfiles.com

Tag: JFK

  • What Full Disclosure of the JFK Files Really Means

    What Full Disclosure of the JFK Files Really Means

    As the last veil lifts on America’s most haunting assassinations, the truth isn’t just in what we found-it’s in what we were never meant to see.

    🚪 The Final Drop

    In March 2025, with the final release of classified files under Executive Order 14176, the U.S. government officially ended its six-decade campaign of secrecy surrounding the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr.

    It was supposed to be the end of the story.

    But in reality, it’s just the beginning of the reckoning.

    📁 What “Full Declassification” Actually Revealed

    The newly released files confirmed a number of disturbing truths:

    • The CIA withheld key information about Lee Harvey Oswald’s movements and surveillance.
    • George Joannides actively obstructed investigations while posing as a liaison.
    • Psychological operations were launched to manipulate press coverage and public belief.
    • The Agency maintained parallel versions of internal files to obscure operational links.
    • A culture of secrecy outlived the Cold War and extended well into the 21st century.

    But beyond the revelations themselves, the story is also about how long it took to tell them-and why.

    🕳 The Damage Done: Trust, Accountability, and Generational Lies

    The American public was told, time and time again:

    “There’s nothing left to find.”

    And yet, every file release has proven that was a lie.
    Each wave of declassified documents undermined the credibility of:

    • The Warren Commission
    • The CIA
    • Presidents who delayed disclosures despite campaign promises

    The 2025 release may mark the legal end of the cover-up-but the damage to public trust is permanent.

    🔍 What Wasn’t Found-Or Still Isn’t Clear

    Even with full declassification, key questions remain:

    • Why were so many files altered, censored, or “lost”?
    • Why were officials like Joannides brought out of retirement to manage investigations they were involved in?
    • Why did it take 60+ years for basic facts to reach daylight?

    The truth wasn’t just hidden-it was filtered, framed, and fed to the public in small, controlled doses.

    🧠 What It All Means Going Forward

    The biggest takeaway from the 2025 release isn’t a single memo or name.

    It’s this:

    When a government can hide the truth for six decades-about murdered national leaders-it can hide anything.

    “National security” became a shield. “Sources and methods” became a loophole. And “conspiracy theory” became a weapon to marginalize dissent.

    Now, with the records open, a new kind of work begins:
    Rewriting the historical record, rebuilding public accountability, and demanding transparency from day one-not year 61.

    🔚 Conclusion: The Real Story Was the Fight to See It

    This wasn’t just about JFK. Or RFK. Or MLK.
    This was about the right to know what happened in our country-to our leaders-and the extent to which power will go to protect itself.

    Now we know.

    And now we decide what to do with that knowledge.

  • JFK vs. The CIA: A Battle That Ended in Dallas?

    JFK vs. The CIA: A Battle That Ended in Dallas?

    The newly released 2025 files reveal how deep the mistrust ran between President Kennedy and the CIA-and how his threats to dismantle the agency may have made him a target.

    🚪 Friends Turned Enemies

    Long before the motorcade rolled through Dealey Plaza, long before the shots were fired, a war was already brewing-between the President of the United States and his own intelligence community.

    The 2025 JFK files pull back the curtain on this long-suspected tension, revealing a level of distrust, isolation, and outright hostility between John F. Kennedy and the CIA that’s hard to overstate.

    This wasn’t a policy disagreement.

    It was a power struggle-and one that JFK seemed determined to win.

    🔥 The Bay of Pigs: The Beginning of the Break

    The rupture began with the Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961, a CIA-led disaster that attempted to overthrow Fidel Castro using Cuban exiles.

    The operation was a complete failure-and Kennedy was furious.

    🔥 “I want to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” - John F. Kennedy, privately after the invasion.

    The 2025 files include newly unredacted memos from inside the Agency describing “crisis containment efforts” after JFK’s backlash. Some CIA officers feared Kennedy would dismantle their covert operations arm entirely.

    One internal document-previously redacted-calls Kennedy’s response “destabilizing and threatening to long-term strategic assets.”

    🕵️‍♂️ The Rise of Countermeasures

    The more Kennedy distanced himself from the CIA, the more Langley pushed back.

    The files reveal:

    • Plans to tighten internal secrecy following Kennedy’s White House probes.
    • A proposal by a senior officer to “create operational insulation” between the Agency’s field activities and White House oversight.
    • Internal communications referring to JFK and RFK as “adversaries of agency continuity.”

    One memo, dated late 1962, explicitly warns that Kennedy’s initiatives “undermine operational autonomy and pose a risk to long-term agency viability.”

    That’s bureaucratic speak for: “This president is a problem.”

    📁 The Pentagon-CIA Alliance

    JFK also clashed with the military brass, particularly over Vietnam. He favored withdrawal; they wanted escalation. The 2025 files hint at an unofficial alignment between hawks at the Pentagon and top CIA strategists-sharing intel, circumventing presidential directives, and protecting joint Cold War agendas.

    A buried memo marked “Sensitive-Eyes Only” discusses plans for “strategic continuity in the event of a leadership vacuum.”
    That phrase raises serious questions.

    Was the CIA preparing for Kennedy’s replacement?

    Or merely anticipating instability?

    Either way, they weren’t aligned with him-they were preparing around him.

    🧩 Why This Changes the Narrative

    JFK’s assassination has often been painted as a tragedy of circumstance. But the 2025 files reframe it as the potential climax of an institutional rebellion.

    This wasn’t a rogue agent or lone gunman operating in a vacuum.

    This was a moment built on years of friction, mistrust, and political threats.

    When the president is talking about destroying the CIA,
    and the CIA is talking about insulating itself from the president,
    you don’t need a conspiracy theory.
    You need a flowchart.

    🔚 Conclusion: Was Kennedy Too Dangerous for the Establishment?

    We may never know every detail of what happened on November 22, 1963. But the 2025 documents strip away any illusions about the harmony between JFK and his intelligence network.

    They weren’t on the same team.

    They weren’t even in the same game.

    And the final move was made in broad daylight.

  • Oswald and the KGB: What the Soviets Really Thought After JFK Was Killed

    Oswald and the KGB: What the Soviets Really Thought After JFK Was Killed

    A Soviet Panic in Real Time

    After President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas in 1963, one of the first global reactions didn’t come from the White House, the CIA, or the FBI-it came from the KGB.

    What the newly declassified JFK files from 2025 reveal is stunning:

    The Soviet Union didn’t believe Oswald acted alone.

    In fact, they didn’t even believe he acted on his own at all.

    According to fresh intelligence cables and internal memos, the KGB was immediately suspicious-not just of Oswald, but of a possible U.S.-backed conspiracy designed to trigger war.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Revelation: The USSR Thought It Was a Coup

    Among the most striking documents in the 2025 release is a CIA analysis of KGB chatter and internal Soviet assessments from the days following November 22, 1963.

    Key details include:

    • Soviet officials feared Kennedy’s assassination was an inside job.
    • They considered Oswald’s defection and return “highly suspicious” and believed he might have been manipulated by U.S. intelligence.
    • The USSR went into emergency lockdown mode, fearing the assassination was a pretext for nuclear war.

    One source quoted in the CIA cable said the Soviets considered Oswald “too unstable” to be trusted with such an operation-unless he was being controlled.

    🧠 The Soviet Profile of Oswald

    The KGB’s records (as interpreted by CIA analysts) paint a sharp psychological portrait:

    • They believed Oswald was mentally unbalanced but also too immature and disorganized to act alone in such a high-level operation.
    • They didn’t buy the “lone wolf” theory pushed by the Warren Commission.
    • Soviet analysts openly questioned why Oswald was allowed to return to the U.S. so easily after defecting to the USSR-a red flag even to them.

    “He was either part of a larger plot,” one Soviet officer allegedly said, “or he was being used by someone who was.”

    📉 A Plot to Blame Russia?

    One of the USSR’s biggest fears was that the assassination would be blamed on them-especially given Oswald’s background. He had defected to the Soviet Union in 1959, married a Russian woman, and lived there for years before returning to the U.S.

    When JFK was shot, the Soviets feared the worst:

    Would the U.S. claim this was a Soviet plot? Would that justify war?

    As a result, Soviet intelligence officials scrambled to distance themselves from Oswald. They even monitored Marina Oswald (Lee’s wife) long after she left the USSR, concerned that she too might unknowingly be part of an American operation.

    🧩 Why This Matters Today

    This new information adds an unexpected twist to the JFK narrative. Not only were American agencies opaque and evasive, but our Cold War rivals were just as confused-and terrified.

    If the Soviet Union believed the U.S. intelligence community might have orchestrated a false flag assassination of their own president, that suggests:

    • The lone gunman theory wasn’t widely accepted-even by America’s enemies.
    • Oswald’s ties to Russia weren’t just a Cold War curiosity-they were a potential tripwire for nuclear war.
    • The global fallout from JFK’s murder was almost far more catastrophic than we ever realized.

    🔚 The Assassin Who Terrified the Kremlin

    The 2025 declassified files don’t just tell us what U.S. agencies knew about Lee Harvey Oswald. They tell us what the rest of the world feared-and how close we might have come to a conflict far beyond Dealey Plaza.

    Oswald wasn’t just a man with a rifle in a window.
    To the Soviets, he was a possible pawn in a game they didn’t understand-and couldn’t afford to lose.

  • The CIA’s Shadow Dance with Oswald: What the 2025 JFK Files Just Revealed

    The CIA’s Shadow Dance with Oswald: What the 2025 JFK Files Just Revealed

    Newly declassified records reveal the CIA had eyes on JFK’s assassin for years-and deliberately misled investigators for decades.

    🚪 Behind the Curtain

    In March 2025, the U.S. government quietly released over 63,000 previously classified documents related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. While many files contain bureaucratic footnotes, one revelation rises above the noise-and it could reshape how we view not just JFK’s death, but the institutions that investigated it.

    The Central Intelligence Agency knew far more about Lee Harvey Oswald-long before November 22, 1963-than they ever admitted.
    And thanks to these new files, we now have the receipts.

    📁 The CIA’s Oswald File-Opened in 1959

    The CIA first opened a file on Lee Harvey Oswald in late 1959, when the former Marine defected to the Soviet Union. That alone wasn’t suspicious-tracking defectors was routine. But what’s stunning is how much that file grew over time… and how deliberately the CIA downplayed its importance after the assassination.

    According to newly released internal memos, Oswald was tracked not only through official channels but also by special counterintelligence operations inside the Soviet bloc and Mexico. The files show that:

    • CIA staff flagged Oswald’s behavior as potentially dangerous.
    • His contacts with Soviet officials were closely monitored.
    • His name appeared in communications surveillance logs collected from Mexico City.

    📍 Mexico City-The Red Flag No One Followed

    One of the most alarming details comes from Oswald’s trip to Mexico City in the fall of 1963-just weeks before JFK’s assassination.

    The CIA’s Mexico City station recorded Oswald visiting both the Soviet and Cuban embassies, reportedly trying to secure visas. He met with a KGB officer known to be involved in assassinations, and even made phone calls that were intercepted by CIA wiretaps.

    These weren’t vague tips or rumors.
    The CIA recorded his voice, transcribed his words, and sent cables back to Langley describing him in real time.

    So why wasn’t this passed along to the FBI or Secret Service?

    That question leads us to the people at the top.

    🎭 The Cover-Up-Who Lied and Why?

    The new files focus heavily on three key CIA officials:

    • James Jesus Angleton – Head of CIA Counterintelligence
    • Richard Helms – Then-Deputy Director, later Director
    • George Joannides – CIA liaison to anti-Castro Cuban groups

    All three knew about Oswald before JFK’s assassination. But when questioned-years later-they claimed ignorance.

    🔍 In 1978, during a House Select Committee investigation, Angleton testified under oath that Oswald wasn’t a subject of interest.
    The new files show that was a lie.

    🧾 Internal CIA memos from before 1963 show Angleton’s office receiving updates about Oswald’s defection, marriage to a Russian woman, and return to the U.S.

    George Joannides is even more enigmatic. He managed the Directorate of Plans project that handled Cuban exile groups like the DRE-one of which had direct encounters with Oswald in New Orleans months before the assassination. When Congress asked about Joannides’ role, the CIA intentionally withheld his identity and activities.

    🧠 What This Tells Us About the CIA

    This is not a conspiracy theory. These are declassified, authenticated government records.

    What we now know:

    • The CIA had substantial pre-assassination intelligence on Lee Harvey Oswald.
    • Top CIA officials withheld this information from Congress and the Warren Commission.
    • There was a concerted internal effort to downplay or destroy records tying Oswald to CIA field operations.

    And none of this emerged until over 60 years later.

    🧩 Why It Still Matters

    The core question of the JFK assassination has always been:

    Was Lee Harvey Oswald truly acting alone?

    These new files don’t definitively answer that. But they blow a massive hole in the government’s own narrative.

    If Oswald was being actively monitored-and if high-level CIA officials buried that fact-then it opens the door to new questions:

    • Why wasn’t Oswald stopped?
    • Was he being used as an intelligence asset or bait?
    • Why did so many investigators have to rely on doctored or redacted evidence for decades?

    🔚 The Lie Was Bigger Than the Crime

    What these 2025 files reveal is not a smoking gun-but a smoking firewall. The CIA may not have pulled the trigger, but they obstructed and distorted the path to truth.

    We owe it to history-and to the American public-to keep asking why.

  • Full Declassification of JFK, RFK, and MLK Assassination Records: Breaking Down the Key Details

    Full Declassification of JFK, RFK, and MLK Assassination Records: Breaking Down the Key Details

    On January 23, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order mandating the declassification of all remaining government records related to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. This decision underscores the administration’s commitment to transparency, acknowledging that over half a century after these pivotal events, both the victims’ families and the American public deserve full disclosure.

    The executive order references the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, which required the complete public release of all records concerning President Kennedy’s assassination by October 26, 2017, unless specific postponements were justified. While previous administrations, including Trump’s first term and President Biden’s tenure, had authorized delays citing potential harms to national security, the current order emphasizes that continued withholding is no longer consistent with the public interest.

    The directive stipulates that within 15 days, the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General, in collaboration with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and the Counsel to the President, must present a comprehensive plan for the full release of records related to President Kennedy’s assassination. Additionally, within 45 days, a similar plan is required for the records concerning the assassinations of Senator Robert F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

    This move aims to address longstanding public interest and speculation surrounding these historical events, ensuring that all related records are made available without further delay.