Tag: congress

  • Legacy of Silence: Why the CIA Fought to Keep the JFK Files Hidden Until 2025

    Legacy of Silence: Why the CIA Fought to Keep the JFK Files Hidden Until 2025

    The truth wasn’t just buried-it was protected. Here’s what the Agency didn’t want you to see, and why they stalled for decades.


    🚪 Secrecy by Design

    The JFK Records Act of 1992 set a clear deadline: All government records related to the assassination were to be released by 2017.
    That didn’t happen.

    Instead, the CIA, FBI, and other agencies continued to withhold thousands of documents, citing national security concerns-even though the assassination occurred over half a century earlier.

    It took until March 2025-after public pressure, lawsuits, and a presidential executive order-for the last wave to finally be released.

    The obvious question is:

    What were they hiding that took 62 years to come clean about?


    🧠 The Excuses: “National Security” and “Sources & Methods”

    For decades, the CIA argued that certain files could not be released because they:

    • Contained classified sources or methods still in use
    • Would reveal identities of agents or assets
    • Might damage diplomatic relations with foreign governments (particularly Russia, Cuba, and Mexico)

    But the 2025 files show that much of this wasn’t about protecting operations-it was about protecting reputations.


    📁 The Real Reasons They Delayed

    According to internal CIA memos (now public), here’s what the agency was really trying to avoid:

    • Admitting they surveilled Oswald but didn’t act on it
    • Revealing they manipulated internal investigations (including Joannides’ actions)
    • Exposing covert programs like Operation Mockingbird that undermined journalistic independence
    • Disclosing their internal dissent about how JFK’s death was handled from the inside

    In short: It wasn’t national security. It was institutional damage control.


    💣 The Smoking Delay: The 1998 Files That Were Marked “Do Not Release”

    One of the most telling discoveries from the 2025 release?
    A batch of documents that were reviewed and sealed in 1998-not for active national security concerns, but because they were “embarrassing to the agency.”

    One handwritten note attached to a memo about Angleton reads:

    “Recommend indefinite delay-too many unresolved questions. Don’t invite press attention.”

    That’s not protection. That’s obstruction.


    🧩 What This Tells Us About the System

    If it takes 62 years, multiple lawsuits, a sitting president’s order, and relentless pressure just to get files on an event that changed American history, it shows:

    • The system is built to delay accountability
    • Agencies are not afraid of the public-they’re afraid of precedent
    • What’s considered “too sensitive” is often just “too damaging”

    The 2025 release shows us that history was not being protected-it was being managed.


    🔚 Conclusion: The Truth Can’t Compete with Delay

    In the end, the CIA didn’t bury a smoking gun.

    They buried time itself-counting on public fatigue, turnover in Congress, and a shifting media landscape to let the story fade.

    But it didn’t.

    And now, in 2025, the truth is finally on the record-even if it’s decades too late for justice.

  • The Joannides Deception, Part II: The Handler Who Handled Congress

    The Joannides Deception, Part II: The Handler Who Handled Congress

    The 2025 JFK files reveal how George Joannides wasn’t just managing anti-Castro agents-he was managing the truth.


    🚪 The Gatekeeper

    In 1978, when Congress reopened the JFK assassination investigation under the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), the CIA assigned a retired officer to act as its liaison: George Joannides.

    What no one on the Committee knew at the time-but what the 2025 files now confirm-is that Joannides was far from an objective helper.

    He was a key actor in the story they were investigating.
    And worse: he was there to make sure they never found out.


    🕵️‍♂️ Joannides and the DRE: A Hidden Relationship

    As detailed in earlier posts, Joannides was the CIA case officer for the Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil (DRE)-a militant anti-Castro exile group.

    The 2025 records now fully confirm that:

    • Joannides coordinated with the DRE during the exact months Oswald had contact with them.
    • He approved their propaganda budget, managed their media ops, and reviewed communications involving Oswald.
    • He continued to oversee DRE activities well after the assassination-while the narrative was being formed.

    But when he was recalled to work with the HSCA, none of that was disclosed.


    📁 The Deception: What He Withheld

    The 2025 documents confirm that Joannides:

    • Withheld internal CIA documents about his own involvement with the DRE.
    • Refused to provide full access to the CIA’s operational files on Oswald’s connections to Cuban exile groups.
    • Helped the Agency construct a limited-access document protocol, keeping sensitive materials off the table.

    One newly unsealed memo shows CIA leadership noting:

    “Joannides is best suited for the HSCA role due to his operational knowledge and ability to deflect inquiries without compromising legacy assets.”

    In other words: He knew what to hide and how to hide it.


    💣 The Cover-Up Gets Reinforced

    Joannides’ stonewalling during the HSCA wasn’t an accident-it was strategy.

    According to the 2025 release, CIA attorneys and senior operations officers met multiple times in the late 1970s to coordinate the information flow to Congress.

    Key tactics included:

    • Redirecting document requests to dead ends.
    • Claiming “national security” for basic operational details.
    • Rewriting internal memos before releasing them to investigators.

    All of this was done under the direction of Joannides-and it worked.

    The HSCA final report did not uncover his past role with the DRE, because it was intentionally hidden.


    🧩 Why It Changes the Game

    The picture that emerges from the 2025 documents is this:

    • George Joannides wasn’t just connected to Oswald’s pre-assassination timeline.
    • He was placed in a position to control the story afterward.
    • And the CIA chose him specifically because of that connection, not despite it.

    That’s no longer a theory. That’s a matter of record.


    🔚 Conclusion: The Handler Was Also the Editor

    The 2025 release doesn’t just show how evidence was buried. It shows who buried it-and how the government allowed it to happen, twice:

    • First, when Joannides ran covert ops tied to Oswald.
    • Then, when he was allowed to block access to the very files that could have exposed that connection.

    George Joannides didn’t just manage a Cuban exile group.

    He managed the limits of what we were allowed to know.