thejfkfiles.com

Tag: cold war espionage

  • Feature: When The CIA & KGB Both Watched Oswald & Looked Away

    Feature: When The CIA & KGB Both Watched Oswald & Looked Away

    He defected to Russia. Then came back. Everyone watched. No one acted.

    In the world of Cold War espionage, defectors were never left alone. Especially not those who played both sides.

    Lee Harvey Oswald was one of those men.

    And according to newly released JFK files from 2025, he was more closely monitored than anyone ever admitted.

    Not just by the CIA.

    But by the KGB too.

    THE MOSCOW YEARS

    When Oswald defected to the Soviet Union in 1959, he declared he was renouncing his American citizenship. He handed over military secrets. He asked to stay.

    And they let him.

    The KGB, according to a now-unsealed Russian intelligence summary intercepted and translated in 1962, “did not fully trust Comrade Oswald, but found his presence useful.”

    Useful. Not loyal.

    They gave him a modest apartment, monitored his movements, and assigned watchers. But according to the 2025 declassified CIA analysis, “no efforts were made to recruit him.”

    Why? Because they thought he was a plant.

    And not a very good one.

    RETURNING TO AMERICA-WITH NO QUESTIONS ASKED

    In 1962, Oswald returned to the U.S. with a Soviet wife, a new baby, and no charges. No debriefing. No interrogation.

    The 2025 files show that this was not an accident.

    A CIA memo from April 1962-previously classified-reads:

    “Subject is of marginal utility. Recommend passive surveillance only.”

    Another from FBI counterintelligence simply says:

    “Too hot to touch. Let CIA handle.”

    Everyone thought someone else was watching him.

    No one wanted to be responsible.

    SPOTTED IN MEXICO-AND SHRUGGED OFF

    In the fall of 1963, Oswald traveled to Mexico City and visited both the Cuban and Soviet embassies.

    The CIA had both locations under surveillance.

    Tapes. Photographs. Wiretaps.

    Oswald appears in all of them.

    One Soviet consulate log, released in 2025, lists him as a “disturbed man with unclear intentions.”

    A Cuban embassy report, intercepted by the NSA, described him as “emotional, agitated, desperate to go to Havana.”

    Nobody let him in.

    But nobody stopped him either.

    THE INTERNAL WARNINGS

    From September to November 1963, memos about Oswald circulated quietly across multiple agencies.

    The CIA’s Mexico Station reported:

    “Subject may pose a risk. His behavior is erratic. Ties to pro-Castro groups have intensified.”

    The FBI’s domestic intelligence branch noted:

    “This individual is a known defector with renewed political activity. Recommend continued monitoring.”

    No one acted. Nothing escalated.

    Three weeks later, the President was dead.

    AFTERMATH: THE BLAME GAME

    Immediately after JFK’s assassination, the blame-shifting began.

    FBI blamed the CIA for dropping Oswald after his return from Russia.

    CIA blamed the FBI for failing to track his political activities.

    NSA said nothing.

    One interagency meeting, now declassified, shows a heated exchange where a CIA deputy said:

    “This one should’ve been on your radar.”

    To which the FBI agent replied:

    “He was yours from the start.”

    THE KGB REACTS

    Soviet records included in the 2025 release reveal internal panic.

    A memo from the KGB First Directorate labeled Oswald “unstable and erratic, likely manipulated.”

    They didn’t claim him. In fact, they feared being blamed.

    Their analysis suggested Oswald may have been “directed without knowledge of Soviet command.”

    The implication: even they suspected a setup.

    WHAT THE FILES CONFIRM

    Oswald was under surveillance by U.S. intelligence from the moment he returned from the USSR.

    He was flagged. Logged. Tracked.

    And yet, not one agency intervened.

    He slipped through every layer of the American security apparatus.

    Not because no one was watching.

    But because everyone was-and they all assumed someone else would act.

    A SHARED FAILURE

    The 2025 declassified files don’t prove a conspiracy.

    But they confirm a colossal intelligence failure.

    The CIA watched Oswald. So did the FBI. So did the Soviets.

    Everyone watched him circle closer to the President.

    And everyone looked away.

  • Moscow’s Eyes on Mexico: A Forgotten Pattern of Embassy Surveillance

    Moscow’s Eyes on Mexico: A Forgotten Pattern of Embassy Surveillance

    In the recently released CIA memo from document 206-10001-10003, a curious Soviet national in Mexico City asked targeted questions about U.S. embassy staffing in 1962.

    While the memo has no known connection to Lee Harvey Oswald, it reveals something deeper: a quiet, sustained Soviet effort to probe American diplomatic operations from the inside out, well before the events of 1963.

    🕶️ The Man Who Asked the Wrong Questions at the Right Time

    According to the memo, the Soviet visitor was not officially attached to the Soviet embassy.

    He appeared to be traveling under cultural or academic credentials and approached a trusted CIA source with casual questions about the routine operations and security of U.S. diplomatic personnel.

    “The subject was particularly interested in guard rotation and civilian vehicle access to consulate rear entrances.”

    These weren’t typical tourist questions. And they weren’t asked by accident.

    🧭 A City Full of Secrets

    Mexico City was, by 1962, already a contested front line in the Cold War. Soviet intelligence, Cuban operatives, American handlers, and double agents routinely crisscrossed its embassies, backstreets, and hotels.

    The CIA knew the city was hot-and memos like this one show just how seriously they took even small anomalies.

    The Soviet man’s behavior was flagged immediately. Not for what he did, but for what it suggested: that someone, somewhere, was collecting pieces of a larger puzzle.

    And they were doing it in the same city where Oswald would attempt to contact both Soviet and Cuban officials just a year later.

    🗃️ Not an Isolated Incident

    This wasn’t the first time embassy staff noted probing behavior by Soviet nationals. What makes this memo unusual is that it wasn’t dismissed as gossip or paranoia.

    It was preserved, labeled for “contextual value”-meaning the CIA believed it could tie in with other intelligence leads in the future.

    What else wasn’t shared with the Warren Commission? What other fragments were quietly stored away in files like this-pieces of a threat that was never fully mapped?

    🧩 The Cold War’s Silent Clues

    This isn’t a document about Oswald. It’s about atmosphere. It’s about what intelligence looked like before the dots were connected. The questions asked in 1962 may not have seemed urgent then-but history has a way of giving new weight to old conversations.

    The CIA held onto this report because they understood something crucial: no question is ever truly harmless in a city like Mexico City.

    🔚 Why It Still Matters

    The Soviet visitor was never seen again. He asked his questions and disappeared.

    No follow-up appears in the record. No name, no photo, no outcome.

    But that doesn’t make the memo meaningless.

    It’s a clue.

    A signal.

    A reminder that long before November 22, 1963, the game was already being played.

  • The Cuban Intelligence Asset That Slipped Through the Net

    The Cuban Intelligence Asset That Slipped Through the Net

    In the trove of CIA records released in 2025, a short memo dated September 1963 points to a Cuban intelligence officer operating in the United States-one with direct ties to groups Lee Harvey Oswald associated with.

    The memo was never acted on, never referenced in official investigations, and quietly disappeared into the classified archive-until now.

    📍 A Known DGI Asset Quietly Meeting with Pro-Castro Groups

    The document, labeled 206-10001-10005, contains a one-page field summary from a CIA contact based in Florida.

    The subject: an unnamed male described as a “probable Cuban DGI asset”, active in the Tampa area during the summer and fall of 1963.

    The memo states that the individual-referred to only as REDACTED-1-had been observed attending Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC) meetings and may have had contact with other leftist organizations.

    Oswald, infamously, also associated himself with the FPCC just weeks earlier in New Orleans.

    “REDACTED-1 attended two known FPCC gatherings in Tampa in August and early September. Subject is believed to have reentered the U.S. from Havana via Mexico under diplomatic protections in mid-1963.”

    🛑 Never Followed Up. Never Questioned. Never Explained.

    The memo ends abruptly. No follow-up appears in the record. There’s no indication that REDACTED-1 was monitored, intercepted, or even identified by name after the initial contact.

    The report was marked for “internal retention only” and never passed to the FBI or other domestic enforcement bodies.

    Even more startling: the asset’s presence and possible operational role were never mentioned by the Warren Commission, the Church Committee, or the House Select Committee on Assassinations.

    ❓ Was This Part of Something Larger-or Just Another Oversight?

    Analysts in 1963 may have viewed the Tampa report as minor. The FPCC was not a banned organization, and surveillance of fringe political groups often led nowhere.

    But in hindsight, the overlap between a Cuban intelligence officer and the same group Oswald publicly supported seems far too coincidental.

    The proximity in time and location-Florida in September, Oswald in New Orleans just weeks before-suggests potential channels of communication that may have gone unexamined for political or procedural reasons.

    👤 What Happened to REDACTED-1?

    Nothing in the file indicates any further action. The identity, destination, and activities of REDACTED-1 after the Tampa sightings remain unknown. His last known appearance in the document is dated September 9, 1963. President Kennedy was shot 72 days later.

    The CIA officer who filed the memo was transferred overseas within the month.

    🔍 A Minor Memo. A Massive Implication.

    There is no smoking gun here-just another uninvestigated detail that might matter far more than anyone realized at the time.

    The idea that a Cuban intelligence officer might have operated on U.S. soil, met with politically sensitive groups, and then vanished into the system’s blind spot is alarming.

    If this asset had contact with people like Oswald-or simply influenced the same ideological circles-it raises questions that no commission ever answered.

    And in 2025, it’s still not clear why.

  • Feature: Australia’s Hidden Role in the JFK Assassination Files​

    Feature: Australia’s Hidden Role in the JFK Assassination Files​

    They called once. Then again. Both times, they were ignored.

    When the JFK files dropped in 2025, most eyes turned to Langley, to Dallas, to Havana.

    But buried deep in a document trail long overlooked was a trail of warnings, miscommunications, and political panic that led halfway around the world-to Canberra.

    Australia, known more for its beaches than its intelligence operations, turns out to have played a small but significant role in the events surrounding President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

    And for over sixty years, that role was kept quiet-buried under a pile of redactions and diplomatic nods.

    It started, as these things often do, with a phone call.

    THE FIRST WARNING

    On October 15, 1962, a man with a heavy accent called the U.S. Embassy in Canberra. He claimed to be Polish. He also claimed something more dangerous:

    “A plot to assassinate President Kennedy is being planned by agents from Iron Curtain countries… A reward of $100,000 has been promised to whoever kills him.”

    The embassy typed it up. A classified cable was sent. The Australians were informed. Nothing happened.

    Because who would believe a mysterious Polish driver of the Soviet Embassy?

    SAME VOICE. DIFFERENT DATE.

    On November 23, 1963, just one day after Kennedy was killed in Dallas, the same man called back. This time he didn’t warn of the future-he recounted the present:

    “The Russians here in Canberra celebrated last night. There was vodka, cheering. They toasted Kennedy’s death.”

    This time, he gave more details. He said he overheard names. He said he saw a suitcase being delivered. He said there was a man involved-an Australian. A man who had recently flown to America.

    The call was logged. The CIA received it. ASIO took a copy. Again, no action.

    CD-971: THE DOCUMENT THAT DISAPPEARED

    The two phone calls were eventually compiled into a document labeled CD-971. It was meant to be reviewed by the Warren Commission. It never was.

    Instead, the document was sealed. Australia requested it be buried. CIA agreed.

    For decades, CD-971 was classified not for national security-but for diplomatic embarrassment.

    And now, thanks to the 2025 release, we know why.

    THE SPRY-HELMS EXCHANGE

    Sir Charles Spry was no amateur. The head of ASIO from 1950 to 1970, he was fiercely anti-Communist, secretive, and close with the CIA. When he saw CD-971 on a release list in 1968, he panicked.

    He wrote directly to Richard Helms, then Director of Central Intelligence. The letter, now declassified, is careful but clear:

    “The disclosure of this document risks compromising operations, methods, and facilities that neither of our nations would wish made public…”

    Translated? If this gets out, everyone will know there’s a CIA base in Canberra. And that ASIO helped suppress a lead on JFK’s assassination.

    Helms agreed. CD-971 stayed sealed.

    WHY IT MATTERS

    You could argue that the calls were fake. That the man was drunk, or delusional, or fabricating stories for attention. ASIO certainly did.

    But here’s what matters: He called before the assassination. Then again after. He gave names. He gave descriptions. He mentioned movements.

    And both the U.S. and Australia chose to say: nothing to see here.

    INTELLIGENCE BY OMISSION

    ASIO’s internal memos show clear discomfort. A March 1964 file noted:

    “While the veracity of the caller is in doubt, the timeline and content suggest further inquiry may have been warranted.”

    But no inquiry happened. In fact, according to a now-declassified cable, ASIO instructed the U.S. Embassy to treat the matter as “closed unless new information is presented.”

    The Americans complied.

    WHY KEEP IT SECRET?

    There are two theories.

    One: The call was real. ASIO and the CIA buried it because they missed it. Embarrassment is a powerful silencer.

    Two: The call pointed too close to something real. A suitcase. A man flying to Dallas. Soviet Embassy staff cheering. Too much heat.

    Either way, CD-971 vanished from the conversation for over half a century.

    THE 2025 REVELATIONS

    When the Biden-Trump executive order (yes, you read that right) led to the full declassification of all JFK records in 2025, CD-971 resurfaced.

    Along with it: six other documents referencing “ASIO–CIA liaison protocols” and “international lead suppression.”

    One of those included a curious postscript:

    “Australia expresses ongoing concern about being named in assassination-related materials.”

    Another included a memo from 1969, in which an American diplomat in Canberra warns:

    “There is a risk that anti-war elements or press in Australia will connect the embassy calls to the broader narrative of intelligence failures in Dallas.”

    They never did. Until now.

    WHO WAS THE CALLER?

    We still don’t know. But the CIA’s internal analysis, included in the 2025 release, speculates he may have been a Soviet defector-or a double agent.

    One field report from 1963 even lists a “Polish-national chauffeur” suspected of leaking information.

    Another memo suggests he may have been part of a disinformation campaign.

    Which begs the question: If he was a Soviet plant… why hide it?

    THE SILENCE DOWN UNDER

    ASIO has remained characteristically tight-lipped. Even after the 2025 declassification, no Australian official has publicly commented on CD-971.

    But internal Department of Foreign Affairs memos now released show that Australia was briefed in 1976 that CD-971 “could eventually be made public.”

    Their recommendation? Delay, deflect, deny.

    WHAT ELSE IS MISSING?

    CD-971 is a flashpoint not because of what it says-but what it implies.

    That allied nations were involved, however lightly, in shaping the official story.

    That intelligence-sharing agreements extended to mutually agreed suppression.

    That leads-even bizarre ones-were buried not after being debunked, but before being explored.

    A GLOBAL COVER-UP?

    No. But a global embarrassment? Absolutely.

    Australia didn’t kill Kennedy. But they might have had a clue. And rather than face scrutiny, they closed the file.

    Just like the CIA. Just like the FBI. Just like the Warren Commission.

    AND THEN WHAT?

    The man who called never surfaced again. The alleged suitcase? Never found. The Australian traveler to Dallas? Never identified.

    But the idea that a random man in Canberra might have known something-something the intelligence community didn’t want known-has now been written back into history.

    Because thanks to the 2025 files, CD-971 is no longer buried.

    It’s public.

    And that changes everything.