Tag: CIA

  • Feature: Australia’s Hidden Role in the JFK Assassination Files​

    Feature: Australia’s Hidden Role in the JFK Assassination Files​

    They called once. Then again. Both times, they were ignored.

    When the JFK files dropped in 2025, most eyes turned to Langley, to Dallas, to Havana.

    But buried deep in a document trail long overlooked was a trail of warnings, miscommunications, and political panic that led halfway around the world-to Canberra.

    Australia, known more for its beaches than its intelligence operations, turns out to have played a small but significant role in the events surrounding President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

    And for over sixty years, that role was kept quiet-buried under a pile of redactions and diplomatic nods.

    It started, as these things often do, with a phone call.


    THE FIRST WARNING

    On October 15, 1962, a man with a heavy accent called the U.S. Embassy in Canberra. He claimed to be Polish. He also claimed something more dangerous:

    “A plot to assassinate President Kennedy is being planned by agents from Iron Curtain countries… A reward of $100,000 has been promised to whoever kills him.”

    The embassy typed it up. A classified cable was sent. The Australians were informed. Nothing happened.

    Because who would believe a mysterious Polish driver of the Soviet Embassy?


    SAME VOICE. DIFFERENT DATE.

    On November 23, 1963, just one day after Kennedy was killed in Dallas, the same man called back. This time he didn’t warn of the future-he recounted the present:

    “The Russians here in Canberra celebrated last night. There was vodka, cheering. They toasted Kennedy’s death.”

    This time, he gave more details. He said he overheard names. He said he saw a suitcase being delivered. He said there was a man involved-an Australian. A man who had recently flown to America.

    The call was logged. The CIA received it. ASIO took a copy. Again, no action.


    CD-971: THE DOCUMENT THAT DISAPPEARED

    The two phone calls were eventually compiled into a document labeled CD-971. It was meant to be reviewed by the Warren Commission. It never was.

    Instead, the document was sealed. Australia requested it be buried. CIA agreed.

    For decades, CD-971 was classified not for national security-but for diplomatic embarrassment.

    And now, thanks to the 2025 release, we know why.


    THE SPRY-HELMS EXCHANGE

    Sir Charles Spry was no amateur. The head of ASIO from 1950 to 1970, he was fiercely anti-Communist, secretive, and close with the CIA. When he saw CD-971 on a release list in 1968, he panicked.

    He wrote directly to Richard Helms, then Director of Central Intelligence. The letter, now declassified, is careful but clear:

    “The disclosure of this document risks compromising operations, methods, and facilities that neither of our nations would wish made public…”

    Translated? If this gets out, everyone will know there’s a CIA base in Canberra. And that ASIO helped suppress a lead on JFK’s assassination.

    Helms agreed. CD-971 stayed sealed.


    WHY IT MATTERS

    You could argue that the calls were fake. That the man was drunk, or delusional, or fabricating stories for attention. ASIO certainly did.

    But here’s what matters: He called before the assassination. Then again after. He gave names. He gave descriptions. He mentioned movements.

    And both the U.S. and Australia chose to say: nothing to see here.


    INTELLIGENCE BY OMISSION

    ASIO’s internal memos show clear discomfort. A March 1964 file noted:

    “While the veracity of the caller is in doubt, the timeline and content suggest further inquiry may have been warranted.”

    But no inquiry happened. In fact, according to a now-declassified cable, ASIO instructed the U.S. Embassy to treat the matter as “closed unless new information is presented.”

    The Americans complied.


    WHY KEEP IT SECRET?

    There are two theories.

    One: The call was real. ASIO and the CIA buried it because they missed it. Embarrassment is a powerful silencer.

    Two: The call pointed too close to something real. A suitcase. A man flying to Dallas. Soviet Embassy staff cheering. Too much heat.

    Either way, CD-971 vanished from the conversation for over half a century.


    THE 2025 REVELATIONS

    When the Biden-Trump executive order (yes, you read that right) led to the full declassification of all JFK records in 2025, CD-971 resurfaced.

    Along with it: six other documents referencing “ASIO–CIA liaison protocols” and “international lead suppression.”

    One of those included a curious postscript:

    “Australia expresses ongoing concern about being named in assassination-related materials.”

    Another included a memo from 1969, in which an American diplomat in Canberra warns:

    “There is a risk that anti-war elements or press in Australia will connect the embassy calls to the broader narrative of intelligence failures in Dallas.”

    They never did. Until now.


    WHO WAS THE CALLER?

    We still don’t know. But the CIA’s internal analysis, included in the 2025 release, speculates he may have been a Soviet defector-or a double agent.

    One field report from 1963 even lists a “Polish-national chauffeur” suspected of leaking information.

    Another memo suggests he may have been part of a disinformation campaign.

    Which begs the question: If he was a Soviet plant… why hide it?


    THE SILENCE DOWN UNDER

    ASIO has remained characteristically tight-lipped. Even after the 2025 declassification, no Australian official has publicly commented on CD-971.

    But internal Department of Foreign Affairs memos now released show that Australia was briefed in 1976 that CD-971 “could eventually be made public.”

    Their recommendation? Delay, deflect, deny.


    WHAT ELSE IS MISSING?

    CD-971 is a flashpoint not because of what it says-but what it implies.

    That allied nations were involved, however lightly, in shaping the official story.

    That intelligence-sharing agreements extended to mutually agreed suppression.

    That leads-even bizarre ones-were buried not after being debunked, but before being explored.


    A GLOBAL COVER-UP?

    No. But a global embarrassment? Absolutely.

    Australia didn’t kill Kennedy. But they might have had a clue. And rather than face scrutiny, they closed the file.

    Just like the CIA. Just like the FBI. Just like the Warren Commission.


    AND THEN WHAT?

    The man who called never surfaced again. The alleged suitcase? Never found. The Australian traveler to Dallas? Never identified.

    But the idea that a random man in Canberra might have known something-something the intelligence community didn’t want known-has now been written back into history.

    Because thanks to the 2025 files, CD-971 is no longer buried.

    It’s public.

    And that changes everything.

  • The CIA Officers Who Tried to Blow the Whistle

    The CIA Officers Who Tried to Blow the Whistle

    Declassified internal complaints reveal quiet resistance from agents disturbed by how Oswald’s case-and the assassination aftermath-were handled.


    🚪 The Silence Wasn’t Total

    While the official CIA position was one of cold control and tight messaging, the 2025 records expose something else happening behind the scenes:

    Pockets of internal protest, ignored warnings, and career-ending resistance from within the Agency.

    These weren’t conspiracy theorists.

    They were analysts, case officers, and surveillance techs-and they knew the story didn’t add up.


    📁 Redacted No More: The Dunn Memo

    An internal complaint filed on December 3, 1963 by tech officer Gerald Dunn (heavily redacted until now), stated:

    “It is impossible to reconcile our Mexico City intercepts with the timeline being presented to the public.”

    Dunn was removed from field duty two weeks later.

    His personnel file includes the vague notation:

    “Disposition: administrative reassignment due to morale conflict.”


    🧠 The Warren Pushback: “We’re Being Used”

    Another internal memo from early 1964 quotes a CIA liaison to the Warren Commission:

    “This is not a fact-finding mission. This is damage control.”

    The author, believed to be Richard L. Cain, wrote privately to a colleague:

    “We are being told to omit anything that complicates the lone gunman scenario.”

    Cain’s access to the investigation was revoked two weeks later.


    🕵️‍♂️ The Surveillance Analyst Who Saw Too Much

    An NSA-CIA crossover report notes a Mexico City audio tech flagged an Oswald tape as “inconsistent with known voiceprint” and suggested it was someone posing as Oswald.

    The tech was advised to “avoid further conclusions outside operational scope.”

    That tape?
    “Lost in transfer.”


    🔥 “The Quiet Files” Initiative

    By spring 1964, the Agency launched a project internally labeled “QUIET FILES.” The goal?

    • Identify personnel expressing dissent
    • Document “non-aligned narrative behavior”
    • Preempt any whistleblowing with “non-promotion pathways”

    The strategy worked.

    Many voices went silent-not because they were wrong, but because they were buried.


    🔚 Suppressed from Within

    For decades, public researchers were gaslit, ridiculed, and dismissed.

    But now we know-some of the CIA’s own people were saying the same things.

    The problem wasn’t just what the CIA told us.

    It was what they refused to hear from their own.

  • How the CIA Tracked Oswald Before November 22

    How the CIA Tracked Oswald Before November 22

    The 2025 files confirm the CIA had eyes on Lee Harvey Oswald long before Dealey Plaza-and chose not to intervene.


    🚪 The Man They Claimed Not to Know

    For decades, the official narrative implied Oswald was a lone actor-barely on the radar of federal agencies.

    But the newly released 2025 files destroy that idea completely.

    The CIA wasn’t just aware of Oswald before JFK was shot.
    They had been tracking him since 1959-and closely monitoring him for months before the assassination.


    📁 Oswald’s “Marked” Status Since His Soviet Defection

    When Oswald defected to the USSR in 1959, the CIA opened a 201 file-a personal dossier used to track potentially sensitive individuals.

    The 2025 documents reveal:

    • The file remained active through his return to the U.S. in 1962
    • Oswald was flagged for repeated “watchlist events,” including correspondence with embassies and political groups
    • One memo from 1963 reads: “Subject exhibits continued instability and elevated threat posture.”

    So why wasn’t he stopped?


    🕵️‍♂️ The Mexico City Surveillance Gap

    The CIA ran heavy surveillance on the Soviet and Cuban embassies in Mexico City, where Oswald visited just weeks before the assassination.

    The new files include:

    • Transcripts of Oswald’s calls to both embassies
    • A memo titled “Subject attempts contact with known hostile agents”
    • A photo surveillance report noting: “Subject present. Identity believed confirmed.”

    The CIA knew where he was, who he talked to, and what he wanted.
    Still, no action was taken.


    🔥 A Decision Not to Act

    The most revealing piece? A November 9, 1963 cable from CIA HQ to its Mexico City station:

    “No further active measures to be taken. Monitor passively. Do not escalate.”

    Why did they pull back?
    The document doesn’t say.

    But other cables reference concerns over “operational conflicts” and the need to “avoid entanglement with domestic political fallout.”


    🧩 The Pattern: Watching, Not Preventing

    The CIA had:

    • A detailed file on Oswald
    • Surveillance of his embassy visits
    • Intercepts of his phone calls
    • Psychological profiles showing instability
    • Reports that he had access to weapons and radical groups

    And yet, they never intervened.


    🔚 From Tracker to Spectator

    The CIA didn’t lose Oswald.

    They didn’t ignore him.

    They just chose not to act.

    The 2025 files make it clear:

    Oswald was watched. Documented. Understood. And ultimately-allowed to move freely toward Dallas.

  • How Allies Were Briefed Before the Public

    How Allies Were Briefed Before the Public

    Declassified cables show that several allied intelligence agencies were informed about Oswald-and the official version-within hours of JFK’s death.


    🚨 Word Spreads Too Fast

    The U.S. government struggled to form a narrative in the wake of the assassination.

    And yet, new 2025 files show that foreign intelligence partners were being briefed on Oswald’s profile-before the FBI or Warren Commission had finalized it.

    The story was being shaped, globally, within hours.


    📁 UK: MI6 Got the Memo Early

    A cable from CIA London Station to Langley, timestamped Nov. 23, 1963 – 04:08 GMT, reads:

    “Have informed SIS [MI6] of suspect’s prior defection, Mexico City contacts, Cuba linkage. Request formal alignment with public narrative once defined.”

    The shocking part?

    The Warren Commission wasn’t even formed yet.

    An MI6 memo, declassified in tandem with U.S. files, notes:

    “US position appears firm re: lone gunman theory. No deviation suggested.”

    That was 16 hours after the shooting.


    📞 Mossad Cable: “Oswald Being Contained”

    A CIA-Mossad liaison report dated Nov. 24-before Oswald was even dead-includes:

    “Oswald believed to have acted alone. Narrative containment advised. Local media exposure discouraged.”

    What’s “narrative containment” doing in a foreign intelligence brief?

    Clearly, the goal wasn’t just clarity-it was control.


    🧠 West Germany: Concern Over Oswald’s Stasi Shadow

    Files from CIA’s Frankfurt base reveal West German intel had long been concerned with Oswald’s potential contact with Soviet-backed operatives in Berlin.

    A November 25 communique from the BND (German Federal Intelligence) asks bluntly:

    “Was he handled or simply unstable? Request access to intercept logs.”

    The CIA response?

    “Logs unavailable. Situation under consolidation.”

    “Consolidation”-not “investigation.”


    🔥 Why the Rush to Coordinate?

    The 2025 documents make it clear:

    • There was an international messaging campaign
    • It prioritized speed over certainty
    • It established the lone gunman theory before any independent probe

    A CIA memo to the State Department sums it up:

    “Public calm depends on global cohesion. Allies must reinforce narrative consistency.”


    🔚 Not Just an American Cover-Up

    The JFK assassination wasn’t just a national trauma-it was a geopolitical crisis.

    And the story told to the American people?
    It was already being delivered to allies before the autopsy was even complete.

    The 2025 files show: the cover-up wasn’t internal.

    It was international policy.

  • The CIA’s Safety Net Around the JFK Assassination

    The CIA’s Safety Net Around the JFK Assassination

    What the 2025 files reveal about how key figures stayed protected-by design, not accident.


    🚪 A System Built to Protect Itself

    “Plausible deniability” isn’t just a political phrase-it was CIA doctrine, built into covert operations to ensure that the people calling the shots could never be held directly responsible.

    The 2025 declassified JFK files don’t show top officials ordering a hit.
    What they show is something more sophisticated:

    A layered structure of compartmentalization, deniable channels, off-the-books players, and missing documentation-all crafted so that the truth could exist without ever being provable.


    🕵️‍♂️ The Doctrine in Practice

    A 1962 CIA memo uncovered in the 2025 release outlines the Agency’s guidelines for black ops:

    • Use of “cut-outs” (intermediaries) for sensitive tasks
    • Never put operational directives in writing when avoidable
    • “Maintain distance between planners and field assets in event of blowback”

    This policy was not theoretical. It was applied.


    📁 How It Played Out Around JFK

    The files show:

    • Oswald’s interactions with anti-Castro Cubans in New Orleans were handled by CIA-funded groups, but the money trail was routed through third-party accounts
    • George Joannides managed Cuban exile groups that clashed with Oswald-but never reported it up the chain, giving Langley “clean hands”
    • Key surveillance on Oswald in Mexico was done via wiretaps and field officers, with headquarters receiving summarized intel, not raw logs

    All of this allowed senior leadership to say, “We didn’t know.”

    Technically true.
    Deliberately structured to be so.


    🔥 The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Confirm” System

    Another phrase that appears in internal communications:

    “Confirmable ignorance”

    This referred to the practice of ensuring that no one too high up in the chain would be formally briefed on red-flag details-so they could later testify, under oath, that they didn’t know.

    The 2025 files include a summary of testimony prep memos given to officials ahead of the Warren Commission and HSCA hearings. The recurring advice?

    “Avoid stating conclusions. Emphasize lack of actionable intel. Do not speculate.”


    🧩 Why This Still Matters

    If the entire intelligence apparatus is built to produce deniability instead of clarity, how can the truth ever be found?

    The JFK story isn’t just about Oswald.

    It’s about how a system can be designed to know everything-while appearing to know nothing.


    🔚 Built to Obscure

    “Plausible deniability” didn’t just protect the guilty.

    It made accountability impossible by architecture.

    The 2025 files show it wasn’t that the truth got lost.

    It was never allowed to be documented in the first place.

  • The Lost Tapes, Oswald, Embassies, and the Mexico City Cover-Up

    The Lost Tapes, Oswald, Embassies, and the Mexico City Cover-Up

    The 2025 JFK files confirm the CIA had audio of Oswald calling the Soviets. So why were the tapes destroyed-and what did they really capture?


    🚪 A Window of Opportunity (Closed)

    In the weeks before JFK was assassinated, Lee Harvey Oswald traveled to Mexico City, where he visited both the Soviet and Cuban embassies. That alone should have triggered alarm bells. But the 2025 files confirm something far worse:

    The CIA had audio surveillance on Oswald.
    The recordings existed.

    And they were destroyed-conveniently-after the assassination.

    The files now prove: the story we were told about Oswald’s Mexico trip was edited, redacted, and outright falsified.


    📁 CIA Surveillance in Mexico City: Operation LIENVOY

    Mexico City was one of the most heavily surveilled foreign outposts in the CIA’s network during the Cold War.
    Their program, LIENVOY, tapped phone lines inside the Cuban and Soviet embassies.

    The 2025 documents confirm:

    • Oswald called the Soviet embassy multiple times.
    • He spoke with Valeriy Kostikov, a known KGB officer reportedly linked to Department 13-the KGB’s assassination unit.
    • CIA officers recorded and transcribed the calls-including one where Oswald appeared agitated, demanding immediate approval for travel documents.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Destruction of the Tapes

    After JFK’s assassination, the Warren Commission asked the CIA for any tapes of Oswald’s Mexico calls.

    The Agency responded:

    “All tapes are routinely erased after 14 days.”

    But the 2025 files show that this was false.

    • Internal CIA memos indicate that the Oswald tapes were retained weeks after the assassination, despite the official policy.
    • A cable dated December 1963 acknowledges that audio analysis was performed after the assassination, proving the tapes still existed.
    • Another document includes a staff note: “Recommend immediate disposal to limit interagency review.”

    They weren’t “routinely erased.” They were intentionally erased-after Oswald was dead.


    🎧 Who Was Really on the Tape?

    Another mystery the 2025 documents hint at-but don’t fully resolve-is this:

    Was the voice on the tape even Oswald’s?

    Some CIA staff questioned whether the caller was an impersonator. The 2025 release includes:

    • A report titled “Identity Unconfirmed: Soviet Call Intercept”
    • A voice comparison memo stating “inconclusive” match with known Oswald samples
    • A request to “avoid further dissemination of the anomaly”

    The CIA killed the tapes-and the question-before it could go public.


    🧩 Why This Is a Smoking Gun (Not Just a Glitch)

    Oswald calling the Soviet embassy, speaking to a KGB assassin handler, just weeks before JFK is killed? That should’ve triggered a full-stop security alert.

    But instead:

    • The tapes vanished
    • The transcripts were redacted
    • The embassy logs were altered

    And the CIA told Congress a different version of the story-a version that now lies in tatters, thanks to the 2025 disclosures.


    🔚 One Tape Could’ve Changed Everything

    If the tapes had been preserved-if they’d reached the Warren Commission, or Congress, or the public-we might have had proof of intent, proof of a wider network, or proof that Oswald wasn’t acting alone.

    Instead, we got nothing.

    Because when the most crucial piece of evidence disappears, what’s left is not just a mystery.

    It’s a message.

  • What Full Disclosure of the JFK Files Really Means

    What Full Disclosure of the JFK Files Really Means

    As the last veil lifts on America’s most haunting assassinations, the truth isn’t just in what we found-it’s in what we were never meant to see.


    🚪 The Final Drop

    In March 2025, with the final release of classified files under Executive Order 14176, the U.S. government officially ended its six-decade campaign of secrecy surrounding the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr.

    It was supposed to be the end of the story.

    But in reality, it’s just the beginning of the reckoning.


    📁 What “Full Declassification” Actually Revealed

    The newly released files confirmed a number of disturbing truths:

    • The CIA withheld key information about Lee Harvey Oswald’s movements and surveillance.
    • George Joannides actively obstructed investigations while posing as a liaison.
    • Psychological operations were launched to manipulate press coverage and public belief.
    • The Agency maintained parallel versions of internal files to obscure operational links.
    • A culture of secrecy outlived the Cold War and extended well into the 21st century.

    But beyond the revelations themselves, the story is also about how long it took to tell them-and why.


    🕳 The Damage Done: Trust, Accountability, and Generational Lies

    The American public was told, time and time again:

    “There’s nothing left to find.”

    And yet, every file release has proven that was a lie.
    Each wave of declassified documents undermined the credibility of:

    • The Warren Commission
    • The CIA
    • Presidents who delayed disclosures despite campaign promises

    The 2025 release may mark the legal end of the cover-up-but the damage to public trust is permanent.


    🔍 What Wasn’t Found-Or Still Isn’t Clear

    Even with full declassification, key questions remain:

    • Why were so many files altered, censored, or “lost”?
    • Why were officials like Joannides brought out of retirement to manage investigations they were involved in?
    • Why did it take 60+ years for basic facts to reach daylight?

    The truth wasn’t just hidden-it was filtered, framed, and fed to the public in small, controlled doses.


    🧠 What It All Means Going Forward

    The biggest takeaway from the 2025 release isn’t a single memo or name.

    It’s this:

    When a government can hide the truth for six decades-about murdered national leaders-it can hide anything.

    “National security” became a shield. “Sources and methods” became a loophole. And “conspiracy theory” became a weapon to marginalize dissent.

    Now, with the records open, a new kind of work begins:
    Rewriting the historical record, rebuilding public accountability, and demanding transparency from day one-not year 61.


    🔚 Conclusion: The Real Story Was the Fight to See It

    This wasn’t just about JFK. Or RFK. Or MLK.
    This was about the right to know what happened in our country-to our leaders-and the extent to which power will go to protect itself.

    Now we know.

    And now we decide what to do with that knowledge.

  • Legacy of Silence: Why the CIA Fought to Keep the JFK Files Hidden Until 2025

    Legacy of Silence: Why the CIA Fought to Keep the JFK Files Hidden Until 2025

    The truth wasn’t just buried-it was protected. Here’s what the Agency didn’t want you to see, and why they stalled for decades.


    🚪 Secrecy by Design

    The JFK Records Act of 1992 set a clear deadline: All government records related to the assassination were to be released by 2017.
    That didn’t happen.

    Instead, the CIA, FBI, and other agencies continued to withhold thousands of documents, citing national security concerns-even though the assassination occurred over half a century earlier.

    It took until March 2025-after public pressure, lawsuits, and a presidential executive order-for the last wave to finally be released.

    The obvious question is:

    What were they hiding that took 62 years to come clean about?


    🧠 The Excuses: “National Security” and “Sources & Methods”

    For decades, the CIA argued that certain files could not be released because they:

    • Contained classified sources or methods still in use
    • Would reveal identities of agents or assets
    • Might damage diplomatic relations with foreign governments (particularly Russia, Cuba, and Mexico)

    But the 2025 files show that much of this wasn’t about protecting operations-it was about protecting reputations.


    📁 The Real Reasons They Delayed

    According to internal CIA memos (now public), here’s what the agency was really trying to avoid:

    • Admitting they surveilled Oswald but didn’t act on it
    • Revealing they manipulated internal investigations (including Joannides’ actions)
    • Exposing covert programs like Operation Mockingbird that undermined journalistic independence
    • Disclosing their internal dissent about how JFK’s death was handled from the inside

    In short: It wasn’t national security. It was institutional damage control.


    💣 The Smoking Delay: The 1998 Files That Were Marked “Do Not Release”

    One of the most telling discoveries from the 2025 release?
    A batch of documents that were reviewed and sealed in 1998-not for active national security concerns, but because they were “embarrassing to the agency.”

    One handwritten note attached to a memo about Angleton reads:

    “Recommend indefinite delay-too many unresolved questions. Don’t invite press attention.”

    That’s not protection. That’s obstruction.


    🧩 What This Tells Us About the System

    If it takes 62 years, multiple lawsuits, a sitting president’s order, and relentless pressure just to get files on an event that changed American history, it shows:

    • The system is built to delay accountability
    • Agencies are not afraid of the public-they’re afraid of precedent
    • What’s considered “too sensitive” is often just “too damaging”

    The 2025 release shows us that history was not being protected-it was being managed.


    🔚 Conclusion: The Truth Can’t Compete with Delay

    In the end, the CIA didn’t bury a smoking gun.

    They buried time itself-counting on public fatigue, turnover in Congress, and a shifting media landscape to let the story fade.

    But it didn’t.

    And now, in 2025, the truth is finally on the record-even if it’s decades too late for justice.

  • Oswald’s CIA File: When the Watchers Became the Editors

    Oswald’s CIA File: When the Watchers Became the Editors

    The 2025 JFK files reveal how the CIA manipulated Lee Harvey Oswald’s profile in real time-raising urgent questions about what they were hiding.


    🚪 Watching, But Not Warning

    Lee Harvey Oswald wasn’t some unknown name pulled out of nowhere on November 22, 1963. He had been on the radar of multiple U.S. intelligence agencies since at least 1959. But what the 2025 document release confirms is far more chilling:

    The CIA wasn’t just watching Oswald.

    They were editing and curating his file.

    And they were doing it in ways that misled other agencies, Congress, and the public.

    This isn’t speculation. It’s confirmed in their own memos.


    📁 The 201 File: A Timeline of Manipulation

    A “201 file” is the CIA’s main tracking file for foreign persons of interest. Oswald had one.

    But according to the 2025 records:

    • The file was opened late-in December 1960, more than a year after his defection to the USSR.
    • Crucial updates were omitted for years, despite Oswald returning to the U.S., marrying a Soviet citizen, and making public pro-Castro statements.
    • CIA staff flagged inconsistencies internally, but updates were delayed or blocked.

    Worse: After JFK’s assassination, the file was altered retroactively, making it appear as though Oswald was a low-level curiosity rather than a significant counterintelligence concern.


    🧠 Angleton’s Role: Counterintelligence Sleight of Hand

    James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s head of counterintelligence, looms large here again.

    The 2025 files show:

    • Angleton’s office was the central hub for Oswald file activity, and directly responsible for requests to suppress or “sanitize” internal mentions of Oswald.
    • Staff raised questions about Oswald’s movements and affiliations, but were instructed not to forward updates to the FBI or Secret Service.

    This resulted in an intelligence blind spot that was deliberately constructed.

    A 1963 memo unearthed in the latest batch reads:

    “Maintain current posture. Additional dissemination is not recommended at this time.”

    Translation: Keep this quiet. Don’t flag it to the rest of the government.


    🎭 The Paper Trail of Deception

    The 2025 documents also reveal how the CIA:

    • Blocked requests from the Warren Commission for full access to the 201 file.
    • Fed partial documents to the HSCA (House Select Committee) in the 1970s, edited to remove sensitive internal discussions.
    • Maintained a separate, internal-only version of the file with information that was never made public-until now.

    This was more than a cover-up. It was file laundering.


    🧩 Why This Matters Now

    Oswald’s CIA file was central to determining whether he was a lone gunman, a manipulated asset, or part of something more. By editing that file, the CIA didn’t just withhold the truth-they rewrote it.

    If Oswald’s profile was altered, redacted, and sanitized before and after the assassination, then every official investigation built on that file-Warren, HSCA, even public reporting-was starting with a false foundation.

    When the file is fake, the conclusion can’t be real.


    🔚 Conclusion: The Narrative Was the Operation

    With these 2025 revelations, it’s clear that Oswald’s CIA file wasn’t just a record.

    It was a weaponized narrative-curated, controlled, and used to steer public perception.

    And the people controlling it weren’t on the outside looking in.

    They were the ones who held the pen.

  • JFK vs. The CIA: A Battle That Ended in Dallas?

    JFK vs. The CIA: A Battle That Ended in Dallas?

    The newly released 2025 files reveal how deep the mistrust ran between President Kennedy and the CIA-and how his threats to dismantle the agency may have made him a target.


    🚪 Friends Turned Enemies

    Long before the motorcade rolled through Dealey Plaza, long before the shots were fired, a war was already brewing-between the President of the United States and his own intelligence community.

    The 2025 JFK files pull back the curtain on this long-suspected tension, revealing a level of distrust, isolation, and outright hostility between John F. Kennedy and the CIA that’s hard to overstate.

    This wasn’t a policy disagreement.

    It was a power struggle-and one that JFK seemed determined to win.


    🔥 The Bay of Pigs: The Beginning of the Break

    The rupture began with the Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961, a CIA-led disaster that attempted to overthrow Fidel Castro using Cuban exiles.

    The operation was a complete failure-and Kennedy was furious.

    🔥 “I want to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” - John F. Kennedy, privately after the invasion.

    The 2025 files include newly unredacted memos from inside the Agency describing “crisis containment efforts” after JFK’s backlash. Some CIA officers feared Kennedy would dismantle their covert operations arm entirely.

    One internal document-previously redacted-calls Kennedy’s response “destabilizing and threatening to long-term strategic assets.”


    🕵️‍♂️ The Rise of Countermeasures

    The more Kennedy distanced himself from the CIA, the more Langley pushed back.

    The files reveal:

    • Plans to tighten internal secrecy following Kennedy’s White House probes.
    • A proposal by a senior officer to “create operational insulation” between the Agency’s field activities and White House oversight.
    • Internal communications referring to JFK and RFK as “adversaries of agency continuity.”

    One memo, dated late 1962, explicitly warns that Kennedy’s initiatives “undermine operational autonomy and pose a risk to long-term agency viability.”

    That’s bureaucratic speak for: “This president is a problem.”


    📁 The Pentagon-CIA Alliance

    JFK also clashed with the military brass, particularly over Vietnam. He favored withdrawal; they wanted escalation. The 2025 files hint at an unofficial alignment between hawks at the Pentagon and top CIA strategists-sharing intel, circumventing presidential directives, and protecting joint Cold War agendas.

    A buried memo marked “Sensitive-Eyes Only” discusses plans for “strategic continuity in the event of a leadership vacuum.”
    That phrase raises serious questions.

    Was the CIA preparing for Kennedy’s replacement?

    Or merely anticipating instability?

    Either way, they weren’t aligned with him-they were preparing around him.


    🧩 Why This Changes the Narrative

    JFK’s assassination has often been painted as a tragedy of circumstance. But the 2025 files reframe it as the potential climax of an institutional rebellion.

    This wasn’t a rogue agent or lone gunman operating in a vacuum.

    This was a moment built on years of friction, mistrust, and political threats.

    When the president is talking about destroying the CIA,
    and the CIA is talking about insulating itself from the president,
    you don’t need a conspiracy theory.
    You need a flowchart.


    🔚 Conclusion: Was Kennedy Too Dangerous for the Establishment?

    We may never know every detail of what happened on November 22, 1963. But the 2025 documents strip away any illusions about the harmony between JFK and his intelligence network.

    They weren’t on the same team.

    They weren’t even in the same game.

    And the final move was made in broad daylight.