Oswald in the Archives: What They Knew, What They Altered

Ae95a450 4f33 A5cc 42c37aed4f8d

The 2025 JFK files expose how the CIA selectively edited Oswald’s dossier-before and after the assassination.


🚪 The Man in the File

Oswald’s 201 File-his official CIA dossier-should have been a chronological record of concern. Instead, the 2025 release reveals a frankensteined narrative: selectively redacted, backdated, and misrouted records that left gaping holes in the timeline.

The files weren’t just passive records.
They were tools of narrative control-and someone was holding the pen.


📁 A File with a Life of Its Own

The documents show that:

  • Oswald’s 201 file was created in December 1960, after his return from the USSR-but deliberately omitted early KGB interactions
  • Key updates from 1962 and early 1963 were stamped but never routed to analysts
  • One internal memo (March 1963) was flagged for “removal from primary circulation”

That memo included a warning:

“Subject maintains active contact with Cuban-affiliated groups. Recommend elevated monitoring.”

It never reached field offices.


🕵️‍♂️ After the Assassination: Retroactive Editing

In the days following JFK’s death, the 2025 files show an unusual pattern:

  • Older Oswald-related files were re-reviewed by Angleton’s CI/SIG unit
  • Several documents received new classification stamps and handling restrictions
  • In one case, a file was backdated to appear as if it had been routed and reviewed-when internal logs show it was not

A 1964 note from a CIA legal liaison reveals:

“Necessary to preserve institutional integrity and distance from operational confusion. File restructuring authorized under CI/OPS discretionary order.”

Translation: clean it up.


🔥 The Deleted Documents

Multiple internal cables reference “redundant” or “non-essential” Oswald records being destroyed or marked for “deep storage.” These include:

  • Field cables from Mexico City
  • Psychological assessment drafts
  • Tape logs from embassy surveillance
ALSO READ:  The Secret Service’s Unheeded Warnings: A Tale of Missed Signals

One 1965 message from Records Control:

“Reevaluation complete. Recommend destruction of Q74-Delta annex. Material adds no actionable value to current record.”

That annex reportedly contained Oswald’s full correspondence with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee.


🔚 The File That Wasn’t

What the 2025 JFK files make clear is that we’ve never seen the full Oswald file-not even close.

What we have seen is a version of the man that suited the official story.

They didn’t need to invent a patsy.

They just needed to edit him into one.

Disclaimer: All content on this website is based on declassified documents hosted on the National Archives. Where a specific source is not cited, the information has been compiled from a range of related materials, primarily the JFK Assassination Records. Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, but if you notice any errors or discrepancies, please let us know by leaving a comment.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *