Codename LARKSPUR: The Mysterious Operative Erased After November 22

2cbc4703 Cc85 995d Ff3f6d41abe5

The 2025 JFK files expose a previously unknown asset—or operative—linked to Oswald, Cuba, and the CIA’s darkest corners.


🚪 A Name in the Static

Tucked away in a stack of declassified intercepts is a name that didn’t appear in any previous investigations: LARKSPUR.

The name shows up in:

  • A CIA cable referencing “active Havana routing via LARKSPUR”
  • An NSA intercept mentioning a “confirmed meeting between [REDACTED] and LARKSPUR, location Mexico City, Nov. 2”

The strange thing?

After Nov. 22, no further references appear.

Anywhere.


📁 Who—or What—Was LARKSPUR?

The 2025 documents offer several possible clues:

  • A partially declassified briefing describes LARKSPUR as “a trusted intermediary with Latin American access points”
  • An earlier memo from 1962 identifies LARKSPUR as “used in Cuban informant operations, not officially on the books”
  • The language consistently places LARKSPUR outside official CIA personnel channels—suggesting a freelance spy, double agent, or cutout

🧠 LARKSPUR and Oswald: The Lost Link?

A Nov. 5, 1963 intercept from Mexico City reads:

“LARKSPUR requests clarification on ‘LEE’s handling protocol’ if contact is re-established.”

Who was “LEE”?

The files don’t say outright—but the Mexico City timeline places Oswald there that week.

What kind of “handling protocol” was needed?

For a lone nut?


🔥 Scrubbed Clean

By Nov. 23, 1963, internal documents begin referencing a “sensitive phaseout” of an unnamed operative. One memo notes:

“Assets under Havana routing to be retired, cover removed. LARKSPUR included.”

A week later, LARKSPUR disappears completely.

There’s no closure. No final cable. No termination record.

Even in internal file inventories, LARKSPUR’s name is struck through by hand.


🕵️‍♂️ Parallel to Other Cutouts

Researchers now speculate LARKSPUR may have functioned similarly to:

  • George Joannides’ DRE contacts
  • David Atlee Phillips’ informant rings in Mexico City
  • Or even James Angleton’s “off-books” CI assets
ALSO READ:  The Letter Hoover Buried After It Named Oswald

But there’s no confirmation.
Only a name—and its sudden erasure.


🔚 Erased, But Not Forgotten

The JFK records dump of 2025 gave us names, faces, and files.

But in the case of LARKSPUR, we got something more disturbing:
A missing piece that someone worked very hard to hide.

Maybe LARKSPUR was the missing thread between Oswald, Cuba, and Langley.

Or maybe they were something even stranger: the one who got too close to the truth.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *