thejfkfiles.com

Category: JFK Files

  • How Allies Were Briefed Before the Public

    How Allies Were Briefed Before the Public

    Declassified cables show that several allied intelligence agencies were informed about Oswald-and the official version-within hours of JFK’s death.

    🚨 Word Spreads Too Fast

    The U.S. government struggled to form a narrative in the wake of the assassination.

    And yet, new 2025 files show that foreign intelligence partners were being briefed on Oswald’s profile-before the FBI or Warren Commission had finalized it.

    The story was being shaped, globally, within hours.

    📁 UK: MI6 Got the Memo Early

    A cable from CIA London Station to Langley, timestamped Nov. 23, 1963 – 04:08 GMT, reads:

    “Have informed SIS [MI6] of suspect’s prior defection, Mexico City contacts, Cuba linkage. Request formal alignment with public narrative once defined.”

    The shocking part?

    The Warren Commission wasn’t even formed yet.

    An MI6 memo, declassified in tandem with U.S. files, notes:

    “US position appears firm re: lone gunman theory. No deviation suggested.”

    That was 16 hours after the shooting.

    📞 Mossad Cable: “Oswald Being Contained”

    A CIA-Mossad liaison report dated Nov. 24-before Oswald was even dead-includes:

    “Oswald believed to have acted alone. Narrative containment advised. Local media exposure discouraged.”

    What’s “narrative containment” doing in a foreign intelligence brief?

    Clearly, the goal wasn’t just clarity-it was control.

    🧠 West Germany: Concern Over Oswald’s Stasi Shadow

    Files from CIA’s Frankfurt base reveal West German intel had long been concerned with Oswald’s potential contact with Soviet-backed operatives in Berlin.

    A November 25 communique from the BND (German Federal Intelligence) asks bluntly:

    “Was he handled or simply unstable? Request access to intercept logs.”

    The CIA response?

    “Logs unavailable. Situation under consolidation.”

    “Consolidation”-not “investigation.”

    🔥 Why the Rush to Coordinate?

    The 2025 documents make it clear:

    • There was an international messaging campaign
    • It prioritized speed over certainty
    • It established the lone gunman theory before any independent probe

    A CIA memo to the State Department sums it up:

    “Public calm depends on global cohesion. Allies must reinforce narrative consistency.”

    🔚 Not Just an American Cover-Up

    The JFK assassination wasn’t just a national trauma-it was a geopolitical crisis.

    And the story told to the American people?
    It was already being delivered to allies before the autopsy was even complete.

    The 2025 files show: the cover-up wasn’t internal.

    It was international policy.

  • What Ruby Knew: The Silence That Spoke Volumes

    What Ruby Knew: The Silence That Spoke Volumes

    The 2025 files reveal new details about Jack Ruby’s connections, movements, and possible motive for silencing Oswald.

    🚪 The Man Who Killed the Answer

    On November 24, 1963, Jack Ruby fired a single shot that forever changed the course of the JFK investigation. By killing Lee Harvey Oswald on live television, he killed the only person who could have testified to the truth-whatever that truth was.

    For decades, Ruby was written off as a “grief-stricken patriot.”
    The 2025 documents now paint a far more complicated picture.

    🕵️‍♂️ Ruby’s Criminal Ties: No Longer Deniable

    Previously redacted FBI records, now public, show:

    • Ruby was in regular contact with known Mafia figures in Chicago, New Orleans, and Dallas
    • He was identified in a 1959 FBI report as an “associate with access to syndicate operations across state lines”
    • A 1962 CIA memo links Ruby to a list of “low-tier assets” with potential use in Cuban exile operations

    Ruby was not a nobody. He was connected-and watched.

    📁 The Timeline That Doesn’t Add Up

    According to 2025 files:

    • Ruby was at the Dallas Morning News office early the morning of the assassination, asking questions about JFK’s motorcade route
    • He gained access to the DPD basement through a side entrance, previously marked “secured”
    • He made two long-distance calls in the hours before Oswald’s transfer-one to Chicago, one to Miami-neither number has ever been traced to a known associate

    A note from a federal marshal dated November 24 reads:

    “Ruby acted too calmly for someone supposedly unplanned. The timing was near perfect.”

    🧠 What Did Ruby Say After the Fact?

    While in custody, Ruby’s mental state deteriorated-some say naturally, others say deliberately. But before that, he gave multiple statements suggesting he had deeper knowledge:

    • “There’s a lot more to this than you’ll ever know.”
    • “They’ll never let the truth come out. It has to do with higher-ups.”
    • “My motive wasn’t what they said it was. I was afraid.”

    The 2025 release includes a psychiatric evaluation from 1965, previously sealed, which concluded:

    “Patient expresses credible paranoia of being silenced by federal actors. Claims involvement in broader operation but fears consequences of disclosure.”

    🧩 Why Ruby’s Role Still Matters

    Ruby is the linchpin.

    If he was sent to kill Oswald, then the assassination was not the end of a story-it was the beginning of a cover-up.

    The 2025 documents don’t say outright that Ruby was part of a plot.

    But they remove all doubt that he was connected, coordinated, and protected-until he wasn’t.

    🔚 The Silencer Wasn’t Silent

    Jack Ruby didn’t kill Oswald because he was emotional.

    He killed him because someone wanted a witness removed.

    And now, decades later, the 2025 files confirm:

    Whatever Ruby knew, it was dangerous enough that he had to take it to the grave.

  • What Did Dallas Know? Inside the Local Response to JFK’s Assassination

    What Did Dallas Know? Inside the Local Response to JFK’s Assassination

    The 2025 files reveal how the Dallas Police Department became a pawn in a much bigger game-and how local truth was overridden by federal narrative.

    🚪 The First Responders to History

    On November 22, 1963, the Dallas Police Department (DPD) went from routine security duty to front-page crisis management in a matter of minutes.

    But according to the 2025 declassified files, what followed wasn’t just chaos-it was containment.

    The federal government moved in fast, took over the narrative, and in the process, suppressed or redirected crucial local leads.

    📁 The Lee Harvey Oswald Interrogation Blackout

    Oswald was in DPD custody for nearly 48 hours before he was shot by Jack Ruby.

    During that time:

    • He was interrogated multiple times
    • No audio or video recordings were made
    • No complete transcripts of what he said exist

    The 2025 files reveal that the CIA and FBI were both present for portions of these sessions. One memo, now unredacted, states:

    “Encourage minimal documentation. Limit open communication with press. Ensure alignment of questioning with established narrative.”

    In other words: steer, don’t record.

    🔫 The Jack Ruby Connection

    Jack Ruby-a local nightclub owner with underworld connections-walked into the basement of DPD headquarters and shot Oswald on live TV. That’s not just a breach of protocol. That’s a total collapse.

    2025 documents include:

    • An FBI note from 1962 identifying Ruby as a “low-level informant with access to organized crime figures in Chicago and Dallas”
    • A warning from a DPD officer, 24 hours before the shooting, that “Jack Ruby is bragging he has information about Oswald”
    • A memo stating that the Secret Service requested a change to Oswald’s transfer route 30 minutes prior-with no explanation

    🕵️‍♂️ Federal Pressure and Media Management

    The files also reveal how federal agencies directed the DPD’s messaging:

    • CIA personnel advised on press releases
    • The FBI vetted which DPD officers could speak publicly
    • A DPD officer’s early statement that “Oswald may have had help” was flagged in a CIA cable as “inflammatory and non-aligned”

    The officer was never interviewed again.

    🧩 The Bigger Picture: Control, Not Clarity

    Dallas law enforcement was overwhelmed. But more than that, they were quickly placed under the thumb of federal agencies that had everything to lose if the case spun out of control.

    The 2025 files suggest that:

    • DPD leads were shut down
    • Witnesses were redirected
    • Internal inconsistencies were quietly buried

    🔚 The City That Wasn’t Allowed to Investigate

    The Dallas Police Department didn’t botch the JFK case.

    They were sidelined from it-by agencies that had already decided what the ending should be.

    What was lost in the process?

    Maybe the truth.

    Maybe justice.

    But definitely: trust.

  • The CIA’s Safety Net Around the JFK Assassination

    The CIA’s Safety Net Around the JFK Assassination

    What the 2025 files reveal about how key figures stayed protected-by design, not accident.

    🚪 A System Built to Protect Itself

    “Plausible deniability” isn’t just a political phrase-it was CIA doctrine, built into covert operations to ensure that the people calling the shots could never be held directly responsible.

    The 2025 declassified JFK files don’t show top officials ordering a hit.
    What they show is something more sophisticated:

    A layered structure of compartmentalization, deniable channels, off-the-books players, and missing documentation-all crafted so that the truth could exist without ever being provable.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Doctrine in Practice

    A 1962 CIA memo uncovered in the 2025 release outlines the Agency’s guidelines for black ops:

    • Use of “cut-outs” (intermediaries) for sensitive tasks
    • Never put operational directives in writing when avoidable
    • “Maintain distance between planners and field assets in event of blowback”

    This policy was not theoretical. It was applied.

    📁 How It Played Out Around JFK

    The files show:

    • Oswald’s interactions with anti-Castro Cubans in New Orleans were handled by CIA-funded groups, but the money trail was routed through third-party accounts
    • George Joannides managed Cuban exile groups that clashed with Oswald-but never reported it up the chain, giving Langley “clean hands”
    • Key surveillance on Oswald in Mexico was done via wiretaps and field officers, with headquarters receiving summarized intel, not raw logs

    All of this allowed senior leadership to say, “We didn’t know.”

    Technically true.
    Deliberately structured to be so.

    🔥 The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Confirm” System

    Another phrase that appears in internal communications:

    “Confirmable ignorance”

    This referred to the practice of ensuring that no one too high up in the chain would be formally briefed on red-flag details-so they could later testify, under oath, that they didn’t know.

    The 2025 files include a summary of testimony prep memos given to officials ahead of the Warren Commission and HSCA hearings. The recurring advice?

    “Avoid stating conclusions. Emphasize lack of actionable intel. Do not speculate.”

    🧩 Why This Still Matters

    If the entire intelligence apparatus is built to produce deniability instead of clarity, how can the truth ever be found?

    The JFK story isn’t just about Oswald.

    It’s about how a system can be designed to know everything-while appearing to know nothing.

    🔚 Built to Obscure

    “Plausible deniability” didn’t just protect the guilty.

    It made accountability impossible by architecture.

    The 2025 files show it wasn’t that the truth got lost.

    It was never allowed to be documented in the first place.

  • The Man Who Turned Down The Transfer To Dallas

    The Man Who Turned Down The Transfer To Dallas

    One line in a newly declassified Secret Service staffing memo stood out to the 2025 review board - a single refusal dated ten days before the assassination.

    The agent in question was offered a one-week temporary reassignment to JFK’s Texas detail.

    He declined.

    The reason he gave is still partially redacted.

    🧾 A Name That Was Never Listed In Testimony

    The memo, labeled REASSIGN/SS/TX/1183, was issued from the Secret Service’s Personnel Division on November 11, 1963.

    It shows that Special Agent Loren Paxton was contacted about filling in for a retiring advance man in Dallas from November 18–23.

    His response:

    “Unfit for field duty on current rotation. Decline for personal security reasons.”

    That phrasing triggered a security board review in 1964.

    It was sealed until now.

    🚫 Security Reasons

    The 2025 release includes a second document - a formal incident debrief conducted with Paxton in 1966.

    One line is blacked out.

    But the surrounding lines suggest this:

    “There was chatter about Johnson not traveling, that the trip might not happen. Then it changed all at once.”

    Paxton indicated that “multiple field team agents” had “concerns about the Dallas structure” but were told to proceed regardless.

    🧍‍♂️ Why It Matters

    Paxton wasn’t a flake.

    He was a respected advance team lead with 14 years of motorcade duty. He helped coordinate routes for trips in Caracas, Chicago, and Berlin.

    His file includes a note from his supervisor:

    “Paxton does not decline without reason. He has a background for sniffing out instability.”

    📂 A Quiet Pattern Of Refusals

    The 2025 files now show that three other agents were offered temporary Dallas duty in early November.

    Two transferred.

    One took sick leave.

    Only Paxton filed a written objection.

    Only Paxton referenced “security inconsistencies.”

    Only Paxton is missing from every internal JFK Secret Service report until now.

    📎 He Was Asked To Be There He Said No

    And the file sat sealed for six decades in a cabinet marked “HR Non-Essential.”

    Until now, no one ever asked why.

    Now we don’t have to.

  • The CIA Whistleblowers Who Tried to Talk About JFK

    The CIA Whistleblowers Who Tried to Talk About JFK

    The 2025 files expose how agents who raised questions about Oswald, surveillance failures, and internal manipulation were silenced, reassigned-or worse.

    🚪 When Silence Is Strategy

    The CIA has always had enemies on the outside-but after JFK’s assassination, it also had a growing number of skeptics on the inside. Some agents and analysts couldn’t shake the feeling that things didn’t add up. That files were altered. That narratives were being pre-written.

    The 2025 JFK declassifications finally confirm:

    Those who spoke up inside the CIA were swiftly neutralized-not by violence, but by reassignment, censorship, or career destruction.

    🧠 The Dissenters

    Among the key internal voices flagged in the files:

    • John Whitten – CIA officer initially tasked with investigating Oswald post-assassination. When he discovered that Oswald had contact with anti-Castro groups funded by the Agency, he requested expanded access to files-and was immediately removed from the case.
    • Ray Rocca – Deputy to Angleton, Rocca is shown in the files raising doubts about how the Agency handled Oswald’s Mexico City activity. In a memo dated Dec. 1963, he warned: “There is more to this than we are telling even ourselves.”
    • An anonymous analyst flagged in a 1964 cable for questioning the “recycling” of surveillance tapes that captured Oswald’s voice. That analyst’s notes were removed from circulation and reassigned to a non-sensitive post.

    📁 What the 2025 Files Confirm

    Previously redacted memos now confirm:

    • Multiple agents filed internal communications raising red flags about the Agency’s narrative on Oswald
    • Several of those communications were never logged officially
    • A 1965 internal report titled “Information Control Post-Assassination” includes a list of officers “with concerning interpretations of internal evidence”

    One line from that report reads:

    “Information management is essential not only externally, but internally. Overanalysis undermines confidence in authorized conclusions.”

    Translation: Don’t ask questions.

    🧩 What It Tells Us About the Institution

    These weren’t leaks to journalists.
    These were memos, cables, and sit-downs between CIA employees trying to understand why the Oswald file didn’t make sense, or why key documents had been altered, or why Angleton was overriding requests for information.

    Rather than follow up, the Agency:

    • Shut down internal inquiries
    • Labeled questioners as “operationally compromised”
    • Created a culture of don’t look, don’t ask, don’t tell

    🔚 Conclusion: The Internal Firewall

    The CIA didn’t need to silence the public-it silenced its own.

    The 2025 files make it clear: the truth wasn’t just kept from Congress. It was kept from employees who might’ve found it first.

    That’s not just a failure of oversight.

    That’s an institution defending itself from its own conscience.

  • How the CIA’s Master of Deception Controlled the JFK Narrative

    How the CIA’s Master of Deception Controlled the JFK Narrative

    The 2025 files confirm that the Agency’s top counterintelligence chief was the gatekeeper of Oswald’s file-and the architect of what was hidden from the world.

    🚪 The Shadow Man

    You don’t hear James Jesus Angleton’s name as often as Allen Dulles or J. Edgar Hoover. But if the JFK assassination has a true puppet master behind the curtain, Angleton may be it.

    As the CIA’s chief of counterintelligence for over 20 years, Angleton controlled the flow of internal information, handled “sensitive” files, and oversaw programs meant to mislead foreign operatives-and sometimes, the American people.

    The 2025 files finally confirm what many researchers have long suspected:

    He personally managed the Oswald file-and lied about it.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Oswald File: Controlled at the Top

    According to declassified CIA memos:

    • Oswald’s “201 File” (a personal intelligence dossier) was maintained within Angleton’s CI/SIG (Counterintelligence Special Investigations Group)-a compartmentalized unit that required special clearance.
    • Multiple CIA staff flagged Oswald as a risk, yet updates to his file were intentionally delayed or never passed along to other agencies.
    • Angleton testified to Congress in 1978 that Oswald wasn’t considered a serious subject of interest. The 2025 files show that he reviewed-and edited-those very assessments.

    In other words, he knew. And he covered it.

    📁 How Angleton Blocked the Truth

    The new records detail how Angleton:

    • Withheld internal memos from the FBI and Warren Commission that referenced Oswald’s Soviet and Cuban contacts
    • Coordinated with CIA legal to sanitize documents before they were submitted to Congress
    • Labeled specific cables as “Operational Debris” to justify destruction or archiving

    One note, dated weeks after the assassination, reads:

    “Recommend aggressive minimization. The subject’s activities intersect with ongoing programs.”

    Translation: bury it.

    🎭 The Bigger Picture: Disinformation as Strategy

    Angleton didn’t just cover up Oswald’s past. He helped build a framework inside the Agency for deception, fragmentation, and narrative management:

    • He developed CIA policy around “limited hangouts”-releasing partial truths to mask deeper operations
    • He pushed for media assets to discredit skeptics and shape early narratives around “lone gunman” theory
    • He helped establish the idea that not even Congress could be trusted with sensitive counterintelligence data

    The 2025 files show Angleton wasn’t rogue-he was policy.

    🧩 What It Means Now

    Angleton’s fingerprints are on every major contradiction in the JFK case:

    • Why Oswald’s file seemed incomplete
    • Why the Warren Commission never saw key cables
    • Why the CIA’s own people were kept in the dark

    He didn’t need to pull the trigger.
    He just had to control the story.

    🔚 The Spider at the Center

    James Jesus Angleton built an empire of secrecy inside the CIA-and JFK’s assassination may have been its finest hour.

    The 2025 documents don’t just tell us what Angleton did.

    They show us what happens when the person tasked with finding the truth is the one hiding it.

  • Top 10 JFK Docs from the 2025 Release That Changed Everything

    Top 10 JFK Docs from the 2025 Release That Changed Everything

    Buried memos, erased tapes, secret meetings, and one long-dead lie at the heart of American history.

    When over 63,000 documents were released in 2025, most of the media covered the story in broad strokes-“CIA surveillance,” “Oswald activity,” “internal mistrust.”

    But the real revelations are in the details.

    This post breaks down 10 specific documents that shift the foundation of what we thought we knew.

    📁 1. Oswald’s Mexico City Call Transcript (October 1963)

    What it is: A CIA cable summarizing Oswald’s phone call with Soviet embassy officer Valeriy Kostikov.
    Why it matters: Kostikov was part of the KGB’s assassination department. The CIA heard the call and buried it.

    📁 2. The “Do Not Disseminate” Oswald Memo (Nov 8, 1963)

    What it is: A memo sent from CIA headquarters to Mexico City advising local staff not to report further Oswald updates.
    Why it matters: A direct order to withhold intel-less than two weeks before JFK was killed.

    📁 3. Angleton’s File Alteration Note

    What it is: A handwritten instruction by James Angleton referencing selective edits to Oswald’s CIA 201 file.
    Why it matters: Proves the file was curated-not just incomplete.

    📁 4. “Operation Mockingbird” Journalist Coordination Memo

    What it is: Internal CIA strategy for shaping media coverage of the assassination.
    Why it matters: Confirmed use of assets to push “lone gunman” narrative and discredit critics.

    📁 5. Joannides’ Reassignment Orders (1978)

    What it is: Memo detailing George Joannides’ return to serve as CIA liaison to the House investigation-without disclosing his DRE ties.
    Why it matters: The man Congress trusted had everything to hide.

    📁 6. CIA Internal Dissent Report (1964)

    What it is: A suppressed report cataloging agents who raised red flags about Oswald surveillance and data suppression.
    Why it matters: The cover-up wasn’t external-it was internal too.

    📁 7. “Sensitive – Eyes Only” Contingency Plan Memo

    What it is: Prepared document dated Nov. 19, 1963 outlining agency response in case of “unexpected leadership loss.”
    Why it matters: The CIA was gaming out a scenario eerily similar to what happened-three days later.

    📁 8. Whitten’s Removal Order

    What it is: A top-down instruction to strip John Whitten of control over the Oswald investigation.
    Why it matters: Whitten had discovered Joannides’ link to anti-Castro groups. He was silenced.

    📁 9. FBI-CIA Joint Strategy Doc (Post-Assassination)

    What it is: Internal agreement to manage public messaging “with unity of interpretation.”
    Why it matters: Shows the feds worked together-not to find truth, but to contain fallout.

    📁 10. Mexico City Tape Destruction Cable (Dec 1963)

    What it is: Final order to destroy the recordings of Oswald’s embassy calls.
    Why it matters: They weren’t erased as routine-they were erased as policy.

    🔚 A Paper Trail of Truth

    These weren’t theories. These were facts-on CIA letterhead, with real dates, signatures, and classification marks.

    The 2025 release didn’t offer one smoking gun.

    It offered ten thousand glowing embers-and these ten are among the hottest.

  • The Lost Tapes, Oswald, Embassies, and the Mexico City Cover-Up

    The Lost Tapes, Oswald, Embassies, and the Mexico City Cover-Up

    The 2025 JFK files confirm the CIA had audio of Oswald calling the Soviets. So why were the tapes destroyed-and what did they really capture?

    🚪 A Window of Opportunity (Closed)

    In the weeks before JFK was assassinated, Lee Harvey Oswald traveled to Mexico City, where he visited both the Soviet and Cuban embassies. That alone should have triggered alarm bells. But the 2025 files confirm something far worse:

    The CIA had audio surveillance on Oswald.
    The recordings existed.

    And they were destroyed-conveniently-after the assassination.

    The files now prove: the story we were told about Oswald’s Mexico trip was edited, redacted, and outright falsified.

    📁 CIA Surveillance in Mexico City: Operation LIENVOY

    Mexico City was one of the most heavily surveilled foreign outposts in the CIA’s network during the Cold War.
    Their program, LIENVOY, tapped phone lines inside the Cuban and Soviet embassies.

    The 2025 documents confirm:

    • Oswald called the Soviet embassy multiple times.
    • He spoke with Valeriy Kostikov, a known KGB officer reportedly linked to Department 13-the KGB’s assassination unit.
    • CIA officers recorded and transcribed the calls-including one where Oswald appeared agitated, demanding immediate approval for travel documents.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Destruction of the Tapes

    After JFK’s assassination, the Warren Commission asked the CIA for any tapes of Oswald’s Mexico calls.

    The Agency responded:

    “All tapes are routinely erased after 14 days.”

    But the 2025 files show that this was false.

    • Internal CIA memos indicate that the Oswald tapes were retained weeks after the assassination, despite the official policy.
    • A cable dated December 1963 acknowledges that audio analysis was performed after the assassination, proving the tapes still existed.
    • Another document includes a staff note: “Recommend immediate disposal to limit interagency review.”

    They weren’t “routinely erased.” They were intentionally erased-after Oswald was dead.

    🎧 Who Was Really on the Tape?

    Another mystery the 2025 documents hint at-but don’t fully resolve-is this:

    Was the voice on the tape even Oswald’s?

    Some CIA staff questioned whether the caller was an impersonator. The 2025 release includes:

    • A report titled “Identity Unconfirmed: Soviet Call Intercept”
    • A voice comparison memo stating “inconclusive” match with known Oswald samples
    • A request to “avoid further dissemination of the anomaly”

    The CIA killed the tapes-and the question-before it could go public.

    🧩 Why This Is a Smoking Gun (Not Just a Glitch)

    Oswald calling the Soviet embassy, speaking to a KGB assassin handler, just weeks before JFK is killed? That should’ve triggered a full-stop security alert.

    But instead:

    • The tapes vanished
    • The transcripts were redacted
    • The embassy logs were altered

    And the CIA told Congress a different version of the story-a version that now lies in tatters, thanks to the 2025 disclosures.

    🔚 One Tape Could’ve Changed Everything

    If the tapes had been preserved-if they’d reached the Warren Commission, or Congress, or the public-we might have had proof of intent, proof of a wider network, or proof that Oswald wasn’t acting alone.

    Instead, we got nothing.

    Because when the most crucial piece of evidence disappears, what’s left is not just a mystery.

    It’s a message.

  • Who Killed MLK? What the 2025 Files Say About James Earl Ray-and What They Don’t

    Who Killed MLK? What the 2025 Files Say About James Earl Ray-and What They Don’t

    He confessed, then recanted. Was James Earl Ray a lone racist drifter-or a pawn in something larger?

    🚪 A Convenient Ending

    When Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated on April 4, 1968, James Earl Ray was named, captured, and convicted within weeks. He confessed. He was sentenced. And that was that.

    Except it wasn’t.

    The 2025 declassified files suggest that what we’ve been told for 55 years may be incomplete-or entirely misleading.

    🧠 Who Was James Earl Ray?

    Officially:
    A small-time criminal, racist loner, and escaped convict who pulled off the assassination of the most heavily surveilled Black leader in America… with no help.

    Unofficially:
    According to multiple documents in the 2025 release, Ray may have been:

    • Under surveillance himself in the months before the assassination
    • In contact with unknown intermediaries who paid for his travel and weapons
    • Possibly connected to figures previously under CIA or Army Intelligence scrutiny

    📁 What the New Files Show

    The 2025 batch includes:

    • An FBI memo from 1968 titled “Operation Lantern Spike”, mentioning monitoring of “target suspects converging on Memphis” two days before MLK was shot-Ray’s name is included in a redacted list
    • CIA cables from Mexico City noting Ray’s attempts to travel to Rhodesia using a false passport, and asking whether to flag the State Department-they didn’t
    • A Department of Justice internal note from 1979: “Ray’s movements between April 1–4 remain unverified. Surveillance inconsistencies unresolved.”

    🔍 Ray’s Confession-and Retraction

    James Earl Ray pled guilty to avoid the death penalty. Days later, he publicly recanted and claimed he had been manipulated by a mysterious figure he called “Raoul.”

    The new files don’t confirm Raoul’s identity-but they do reveal:

    • The FBI had at least two open case files on men matching Raoul’s description operating in Canada and New Orleans in early 1968
    • One memo recommended deeper investigation into Raoul’s possible role as a handler or financier-it was marked “Not a priority” and shelved
    • Polygraph results from Ray’s 1977 re-test were “inconclusive with signs of stress, but not deception”-a detail never previously released

    🧩 The Bigger Picture: Why It Matters

    If James Earl Ray wasn’t acting alone, or was directed by someone else, then:

    • The official story was manufactured for closure, not accuracy
    • Potential co-conspirators were either ignored or protected
    • The assassination may have been tactically convenient to multiple institutions that viewed MLK as a destabilizing force

    This isn’t about rewriting history.
    It’s about finally reading the pages we weren’t allowed to see.

    🔚 An Open Case Wearing a Closed Verdict

    Ray died in prison in 1998. The government always maintained he acted alone.

    But in 2025, the documents say otherwise. Not overtly. But subtly, in the things they redact, contradict, and almost-almost-admit.

    So ask yourself:

    If they really believed Ray acted alone… why keep these files sealed for six decades?