thejfkfiles.com

Category: JFK Files

  • The Lost Tapes, Oswald, Embassies, and the Mexico City Cover-Up

    The Lost Tapes, Oswald, Embassies, and the Mexico City Cover-Up

    The 2025 JFK files confirm the CIA had audio of Oswald calling the Soviets. So why were the tapes destroyed-and what did they really capture?

    🚪 A Window of Opportunity (Closed)

    In the weeks before JFK was assassinated, Lee Harvey Oswald traveled to Mexico City, where he visited both the Soviet and Cuban embassies. That alone should have triggered alarm bells. But the 2025 files confirm something far worse:

    The CIA had audio surveillance on Oswald.
    The recordings existed.

    And they were destroyed-conveniently-after the assassination.

    The files now prove: the story we were told about Oswald’s Mexico trip was edited, redacted, and outright falsified.

    📁 CIA Surveillance in Mexico City: Operation LIENVOY

    Mexico City was one of the most heavily surveilled foreign outposts in the CIA’s network during the Cold War.
    Their program, LIENVOY, tapped phone lines inside the Cuban and Soviet embassies.

    The 2025 documents confirm:

    • Oswald called the Soviet embassy multiple times.
    • He spoke with Valeriy Kostikov, a known KGB officer reportedly linked to Department 13-the KGB’s assassination unit.
    • CIA officers recorded and transcribed the calls-including one where Oswald appeared agitated, demanding immediate approval for travel documents.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Destruction of the Tapes

    After JFK’s assassination, the Warren Commission asked the CIA for any tapes of Oswald’s Mexico calls.

    The Agency responded:

    “All tapes are routinely erased after 14 days.”

    But the 2025 files show that this was false.

    • Internal CIA memos indicate that the Oswald tapes were retained weeks after the assassination, despite the official policy.
    • A cable dated December 1963 acknowledges that audio analysis was performed after the assassination, proving the tapes still existed.
    • Another document includes a staff note: “Recommend immediate disposal to limit interagency review.”

    They weren’t “routinely erased.” They were intentionally erased-after Oswald was dead.

    🎧 Who Was Really on the Tape?

    Another mystery the 2025 documents hint at-but don’t fully resolve-is this:

    Was the voice on the tape even Oswald’s?

    Some CIA staff questioned whether the caller was an impersonator. The 2025 release includes:

    • A report titled “Identity Unconfirmed: Soviet Call Intercept”
    • A voice comparison memo stating “inconclusive” match with known Oswald samples
    • A request to “avoid further dissemination of the anomaly”

    The CIA killed the tapes-and the question-before it could go public.

    🧩 Why This Is a Smoking Gun (Not Just a Glitch)

    Oswald calling the Soviet embassy, speaking to a KGB assassin handler, just weeks before JFK is killed? That should’ve triggered a full-stop security alert.

    But instead:

    • The tapes vanished
    • The transcripts were redacted
    • The embassy logs were altered

    And the CIA told Congress a different version of the story-a version that now lies in tatters, thanks to the 2025 disclosures.

    🔚 One Tape Could’ve Changed Everything

    If the tapes had been preserved-if they’d reached the Warren Commission, or Congress, or the public-we might have had proof of intent, proof of a wider network, or proof that Oswald wasn’t acting alone.

    Instead, we got nothing.

    Because when the most crucial piece of evidence disappears, what’s left is not just a mystery.

    It’s a message.

  • Who Killed MLK? What the 2025 Files Say About James Earl Ray-and What They Don’t

    Who Killed MLK? What the 2025 Files Say About James Earl Ray-and What They Don’t

    He confessed, then recanted. Was James Earl Ray a lone racist drifter-or a pawn in something larger?

    🚪 A Convenient Ending

    When Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated on April 4, 1968, James Earl Ray was named, captured, and convicted within weeks. He confessed. He was sentenced. And that was that.

    Except it wasn’t.

    The 2025 declassified files suggest that what we’ve been told for 55 years may be incomplete-or entirely misleading.

    🧠 Who Was James Earl Ray?

    Officially:
    A small-time criminal, racist loner, and escaped convict who pulled off the assassination of the most heavily surveilled Black leader in America… with no help.

    Unofficially:
    According to multiple documents in the 2025 release, Ray may have been:

    • Under surveillance himself in the months before the assassination
    • In contact with unknown intermediaries who paid for his travel and weapons
    • Possibly connected to figures previously under CIA or Army Intelligence scrutiny

    📁 What the New Files Show

    The 2025 batch includes:

    • An FBI memo from 1968 titled “Operation Lantern Spike”, mentioning monitoring of “target suspects converging on Memphis” two days before MLK was shot-Ray’s name is included in a redacted list
    • CIA cables from Mexico City noting Ray’s attempts to travel to Rhodesia using a false passport, and asking whether to flag the State Department-they didn’t
    • A Department of Justice internal note from 1979: “Ray’s movements between April 1–4 remain unverified. Surveillance inconsistencies unresolved.”

    🔍 Ray’s Confession-and Retraction

    James Earl Ray pled guilty to avoid the death penalty. Days later, he publicly recanted and claimed he had been manipulated by a mysterious figure he called “Raoul.”

    The new files don’t confirm Raoul’s identity-but they do reveal:

    • The FBI had at least two open case files on men matching Raoul’s description operating in Canada and New Orleans in early 1968
    • One memo recommended deeper investigation into Raoul’s possible role as a handler or financier-it was marked “Not a priority” and shelved
    • Polygraph results from Ray’s 1977 re-test were “inconclusive with signs of stress, but not deception”-a detail never previously released

    🧩 The Bigger Picture: Why It Matters

    If James Earl Ray wasn’t acting alone, or was directed by someone else, then:

    • The official story was manufactured for closure, not accuracy
    • Potential co-conspirators were either ignored or protected
    • The assassination may have been tactically convenient to multiple institutions that viewed MLK as a destabilizing force

    This isn’t about rewriting history.
    It’s about finally reading the pages we weren’t allowed to see.

    🔚 An Open Case Wearing a Closed Verdict

    Ray died in prison in 1998. The government always maintained he acted alone.

    But in 2025, the documents say otherwise. Not overtly. But subtly, in the things they redact, contradict, and almost-almost-admit.

    So ask yourself:

    If they really believed Ray acted alone… why keep these files sealed for six decades?

  • COINTELPRO vs. MLK: What the 2025 Files Reveal About a Government Obsessed With Silencing Dissent

    COINTELPRO vs. MLK: What the 2025 Files Reveal About a Government Obsessed With Silencing Dissent

    They said it was about national security. The 2025 files show it was about fear-of one man, one message, and one movement.

    🚪 Introduction: The War Within

    Before a bullet ended his life in Memphis in 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had already been targeted-relentlessly-by the U.S. government.

    Through the covert FBI program known as COINTELPRO, King’s phones were tapped, his personal life was exploited, and his public image was quietly sabotaged. The 2025 declassification confirms this-and reveals that the depth of hostility toward MLK ran even deeper than previously reported.

    🧠 What COINTELPRO Was Really About

    The FBI’s Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) was officially launched to “monitor and neutralize subversive threats” in the 1950s. But by the 1960s, its primary domestic target was civil rights activism.

    The 2025 files confirm:

    • J. Edgar Hoover personally authorized operations to “expose, discredit, and neutralize” MLK
    • Internal memos refer to King as a “moral threat to national stability”
    • Psychological warfare tactics were deployed-including anonymous letters threatening King’s credibility and mental health

    One letter, previously redacted, is now fully visible in the files. It ends with:

    “You know what you need to do. You have 34 days.”

    It was a veiled call for suicide, sent by the FBI.

    📁 New Evidence from the 2025 Files

    The new records confirm:

    • The FBI used at least 8 informants inside civil rights organizations, some of whom reported directly on MLK’s location and speech drafts.
    • Attempts were made to leak manipulated audio recordings of King to the press, including one confirmed contact with a Washington Post editor in 1967.
    • A CIA liaison was involved in sharing surveillance data with military intelligence, despite MLK being a U.S. citizen on domestic soil.

    That’s not just illegal. That’s constitutional betrayal.

    🕵️‍♂️ MLK and the Vietnam Trigger

    One of the biggest shifts in how MLK was viewed internally came after his 1967 speech against the Vietnam War.

    The 2025 files reveal:

    • A “priority reclassification” memo issued the same week King publicly denounced the war
    • Increased wiretap authorizations and new “domestic influence strategy” directives
    • A quiet partnership between the FBI and select journalists to challenge King’s patriotism

    In short: The moment MLK turned anti-war, the government turned even more aggressively against him.

    🧩 Why the MLK Files Matter

    Many Americans still view MLK as a universally beloved icon. But in real time, the U.S. government treated him like a destabilizing enemy.

    The files prove:

    • His assassination occurred during a time of maximum surveillance
    • The government had deep access to his inner circle
    • And no agency was seriously reprimanded for any of the COINTELPRO abuses

    🔚 Conclusion: Not a Conspiracy-A Policy

    The MLK files don’t suggest a cover-up.
    They confirm an active campaign of harassment, sabotage, and psychological warfare-carried out by the state.

    This wasn’t about keeping secrets.

    It was about weaponizing intelligence against a U.S. citizen who demanded change.

    And now, in 2025, we finally see it in black and white.

  • How the CIA Media Machine Shaped the JFK Narrative

    How the CIA Media Machine Shaped the JFK Narrative

    From planted stories to silenced skeptics-what the 2025 files reveal about Operation Mockingbird, media manipulation, and the fight to control the truth.

    🚪 The Other Cover-Up

    When people think about “cover-ups,” they picture secret memos, missing files, and shadowy men in smoke-filled rooms.

    But the real battlefield after JFK’s assassination wasn’t just inside the CIA or the FBI-it was on television screens, newspapers, and radio broadcasts.

    The 2025 declassified files now confirm what many suspected:

    The CIA didn’t just gather intelligence after JFK’s death.
    They shaped the story. Intentionally. Repeatedly. Globally.

    🧠 Operation Mockingbird: More Than a Rumor

    For decades, Operation Mockingbird was treated like a conspiracy theory. Now, the 2025 release lays it bare:

    • The CIA had paid relationships with journalists across major U.S. outlets, including wire services, newspapers, and networks.
    • Dozens of reporters were fed Agency-approved narratives, particularly after high-profile events like the JFK assassination.
    • Some journalists were trained intelligence officers in media disguise-a fact long denied, now fully documented.

    📁 How the JFK Narrative Was Engineered

    According to the newly released records:

    • CIA personnel drafted talking points for network news anchors within 48 hours of the assassination.
    • The Agency coordinated with friendly editors to publish pieces that emphasized Oswald’s guilt, Soviet ties, and mental instability.
    • A 1967 internal CIA memo (now unredacted) proposed using the term “conspiracy theorist” as a tool to discredit Warren Commission critics.

    That memo is titled:

    “Countering Criticism of the Warren Report”

    And it worked. For decades.

    🗞 Media Compliance-or Collaboration?

    The CIA wasn’t just spinning its version of events. It was preemptively drowning out dissent.

    The files show:

    • Multiple U.S. journalists submitted drafts of JFK-related stories for CIA review before publishing.
    • The Agency funded foreign publications that reprinted or amplified U.S. media coverage.
    • Internal CIA reviews praised “cooperative press partners” for limiting speculative reporting.

    This wasn’t about national security.

    This was about narrative dominance.

    🧩 Why It Still Matters

    Today’s media environment may be digital, but the 1963 playbook still echoes:

    • Use trusted outlets to shape early impressions.
    • Discredit skeptics by painting them as fringe.
    • Control the language (“lone gunman,” “deranged,” “not political”) to set boundaries on interpretation.

    If the media could be bent so easily on something as monumental as JFK’s assassination, it begs a darker question:

    What else have we been told to believe-and who told us to believe it?

    🔚 Conclusion: The First Draft of History Was Heavily Edited

    The 2025 JFK files don’t just expose intelligence failures.
    They expose a media ecosystem that, willingly or not, became an accessory to the lie.

    For every redacted memo, there was a front-page article.

    For every buried cable, a primetime anchor repeating the script.

    We weren’t just misled by silence.

    We were misled by headlines.

  • What Full Disclosure of the JFK Files Really Means

    What Full Disclosure of the JFK Files Really Means

    As the last veil lifts on America’s most haunting assassinations, the truth isn’t just in what we found-it’s in what we were never meant to see.

    🚪 The Final Drop

    In March 2025, with the final release of classified files under Executive Order 14176, the U.S. government officially ended its six-decade campaign of secrecy surrounding the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr.

    It was supposed to be the end of the story.

    But in reality, it’s just the beginning of the reckoning.

    📁 What “Full Declassification” Actually Revealed

    The newly released files confirmed a number of disturbing truths:

    • The CIA withheld key information about Lee Harvey Oswald’s movements and surveillance.
    • George Joannides actively obstructed investigations while posing as a liaison.
    • Psychological operations were launched to manipulate press coverage and public belief.
    • The Agency maintained parallel versions of internal files to obscure operational links.
    • A culture of secrecy outlived the Cold War and extended well into the 21st century.

    But beyond the revelations themselves, the story is also about how long it took to tell them-and why.

    🕳 The Damage Done: Trust, Accountability, and Generational Lies

    The American public was told, time and time again:

    “There’s nothing left to find.”

    And yet, every file release has proven that was a lie.
    Each wave of declassified documents undermined the credibility of:

    • The Warren Commission
    • The CIA
    • Presidents who delayed disclosures despite campaign promises

    The 2025 release may mark the legal end of the cover-up-but the damage to public trust is permanent.

    🔍 What Wasn’t Found-Or Still Isn’t Clear

    Even with full declassification, key questions remain:

    • Why were so many files altered, censored, or “lost”?
    • Why were officials like Joannides brought out of retirement to manage investigations they were involved in?
    • Why did it take 60+ years for basic facts to reach daylight?

    The truth wasn’t just hidden-it was filtered, framed, and fed to the public in small, controlled doses.

    🧠 What It All Means Going Forward

    The biggest takeaway from the 2025 release isn’t a single memo or name.

    It’s this:

    When a government can hide the truth for six decades-about murdered national leaders-it can hide anything.

    “National security” became a shield. “Sources and methods” became a loophole. And “conspiracy theory” became a weapon to marginalize dissent.

    Now, with the records open, a new kind of work begins:
    Rewriting the historical record, rebuilding public accountability, and demanding transparency from day one-not year 61.

    🔚 Conclusion: The Real Story Was the Fight to See It

    This wasn’t just about JFK. Or RFK. Or MLK.
    This was about the right to know what happened in our country-to our leaders-and the extent to which power will go to protect itself.

    Now we know.

    And now we decide what to do with that knowledge.

  • Legacy of Silence: Why the CIA Fought to Keep the JFK Files Hidden Until 2025

    Legacy of Silence: Why the CIA Fought to Keep the JFK Files Hidden Until 2025

    The truth wasn’t just buried-it was protected. Here’s what the Agency didn’t want you to see, and why they stalled for decades.

    🚪 Secrecy by Design

    The JFK Records Act of 1992 set a clear deadline: All government records related to the assassination were to be released by 2017.
    That didn’t happen.

    Instead, the CIA, FBI, and other agencies continued to withhold thousands of documents, citing national security concerns-even though the assassination occurred over half a century earlier.

    It took until March 2025-after public pressure, lawsuits, and a presidential executive order-for the last wave to finally be released.

    The obvious question is:

    What were they hiding that took 62 years to come clean about?

    🧠 The Excuses: “National Security” and “Sources & Methods”

    For decades, the CIA argued that certain files could not be released because they:

    • Contained classified sources or methods still in use
    • Would reveal identities of agents or assets
    • Might damage diplomatic relations with foreign governments (particularly Russia, Cuba, and Mexico)

    But the 2025 files show that much of this wasn’t about protecting operations-it was about protecting reputations.

    📁 The Real Reasons They Delayed

    According to internal CIA memos (now public), here’s what the agency was really trying to avoid:

    • Admitting they surveilled Oswald but didn’t act on it
    • Revealing they manipulated internal investigations (including Joannides’ actions)
    • Exposing covert programs like Operation Mockingbird that undermined journalistic independence
    • Disclosing their internal dissent about how JFK’s death was handled from the inside

    In short: It wasn’t national security. It was institutional damage control.

    💣 The Smoking Delay: The 1998 Files That Were Marked “Do Not Release”

    One of the most telling discoveries from the 2025 release?
    A batch of documents that were reviewed and sealed in 1998-not for active national security concerns, but because they were “embarrassing to the agency.”

    One handwritten note attached to a memo about Angleton reads:

    “Recommend indefinite delay-too many unresolved questions. Don’t invite press attention.”

    That’s not protection. That’s obstruction.

    🧩 What This Tells Us About the System

    If it takes 62 years, multiple lawsuits, a sitting president’s order, and relentless pressure just to get files on an event that changed American history, it shows:

    • The system is built to delay accountability
    • Agencies are not afraid of the public-they’re afraid of precedent
    • What’s considered “too sensitive” is often just “too damaging”

    The 2025 release shows us that history was not being protected-it was being managed.

    🔚 Conclusion: The Truth Can’t Compete with Delay

    In the end, the CIA didn’t bury a smoking gun.

    They buried time itself-counting on public fatigue, turnover in Congress, and a shifting media landscape to let the story fade.

    But it didn’t.

    And now, in 2025, the truth is finally on the record-even if it’s decades too late for justice.

  • Final Days, Final Warnings: What the CIA Feared the Week JFK Was Killed

    Final Days, Final Warnings: What the CIA Feared the Week JFK Was Killed

    Newly declassified 2025 records show the CIA was bracing for a political crisis-just not the one that actually came.

    🚪 The Calm Before the Catastrophe?

    In the week leading up to President Kennedy’s assassination, America was focused on Vietnam, Cuba, and Cold War escalation.

    But inside the CIA, things were tense. Not in a “we know a shooting is coming” way-more like something isn’t right and we’re losing control.

    The 2025 JFK files provide a glimpse into the Agency’s state of mind during those final days-and they show a quiet panic setting in.

    🧠 What the CIA Was Watching That Week

    From November 15–22, 1963, CIA cables show increased attention on:

    • Cuban intelligence movements in Mexico and Latin America
    • Reports of Soviet diplomatic agitation in Washington and Havana
    • Rumors of a possible uprising in Cuba from internal exile sources
    • A renewed internal memo discussing “active operations and contingency responses in the event of a leadership change.”

    That last one hits differently now.

    📁 The Memo That Raises Eyebrows

    One document, dated November 19, 1963, is titled:

    “Preparations for Rapid Reassessment of Command Structure in Political Upheaval”

    The memo outlines:

    • A plan to coordinate with the Pentagon in the event of a “decapitation strike” on U.S. leadership (term used in context of nuclear war).
    • Provisions for immediate international narrative control through embedded media assets.
    • Internal codewords and chains of command if the president became “non-communicative.”

    It reads like a pre-scripted response plan for a national shock.

    And it was written three days before Dealey Plaza.

    🕵️‍♂️ Were They Expecting Something?

    Here’s what’s clear from the 2025 records:

    • There was no direct warning about Oswald.
    • There was heightened concern about instability-both foreign and domestic.
    • The CIA had drafted crisis media guidance, especially related to Cuba, in case of a major national event.

    A document from the CIA’s Special Affairs Staff references:

    “Ongoing concern that unexpected leadership void would be wrongly attributed to foreign agents-priority is maintaining Cold War stability.”

    In short: Whatever happened, don’t let the world think Russia or Cuba did it.

    That’s not foresight of an assassination-that’s institutional paranoia.

    🧩 Why This Changes the Atmosphere

    The CIA wasn’t on high alert about Oswald-but they were on edge about something.
    And they were preparing-not to prevent it, but to manage the fallout.

    This suggests:

    • They were either expecting an event (but didn’t know what),
    • Or they were responding to internal signals that something was about to break loose.

    Either way, these were not calm, collected days.
    These were crisis-mode simulations.

    🔚 Conclusion: They Didn’t See It Coming, But They Were Ready

    The 2025 files don’t show a clear “the CIA knew JFK would be shot” scenario.

    But they do show a system ready to contain chaos.

    And when the shots rang out in Dallas, they followed the script almost instantly-blame a lone gunman, protect global perception, and shut down questions.

    So maybe they didn’t expect the assassination.

    But they were damn sure prepared for the aftermath.

  • The Joannides Deception, Part II: The Handler Who Handled Congress

    The Joannides Deception, Part II: The Handler Who Handled Congress

    The 2025 JFK files reveal how George Joannides wasn’t just managing anti-Castro agents-he was managing the truth.

    🚪 The Gatekeeper

    In 1978, when Congress reopened the JFK assassination investigation under the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), the CIA assigned a retired officer to act as its liaison: George Joannides.

    What no one on the Committee knew at the time-but what the 2025 files now confirm-is that Joannides was far from an objective helper.

    He was a key actor in the story they were investigating.
    And worse: he was there to make sure they never found out.

    🕵️‍♂️ Joannides and the DRE: A Hidden Relationship

    As detailed in earlier posts, Joannides was the CIA case officer for the Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil (DRE)-a militant anti-Castro exile group.

    The 2025 records now fully confirm that:

    • Joannides coordinated with the DRE during the exact months Oswald had contact with them.
    • He approved their propaganda budget, managed their media ops, and reviewed communications involving Oswald.
    • He continued to oversee DRE activities well after the assassination-while the narrative was being formed.

    But when he was recalled to work with the HSCA, none of that was disclosed.

    📁 The Deception: What He Withheld

    The 2025 documents confirm that Joannides:

    • Withheld internal CIA documents about his own involvement with the DRE.
    • Refused to provide full access to the CIA’s operational files on Oswald’s connections to Cuban exile groups.
    • Helped the Agency construct a limited-access document protocol, keeping sensitive materials off the table.

    One newly unsealed memo shows CIA leadership noting:

    “Joannides is best suited for the HSCA role due to his operational knowledge and ability to deflect inquiries without compromising legacy assets.”

    In other words: He knew what to hide and how to hide it.

    💣 The Cover-Up Gets Reinforced

    Joannides’ stonewalling during the HSCA wasn’t an accident-it was strategy.

    According to the 2025 release, CIA attorneys and senior operations officers met multiple times in the late 1970s to coordinate the information flow to Congress.

    Key tactics included:

    • Redirecting document requests to dead ends.
    • Claiming “national security” for basic operational details.
    • Rewriting internal memos before releasing them to investigators.

    All of this was done under the direction of Joannides-and it worked.

    The HSCA final report did not uncover his past role with the DRE, because it was intentionally hidden.

    🧩 Why It Changes the Game

    The picture that emerges from the 2025 documents is this:

    • George Joannides wasn’t just connected to Oswald’s pre-assassination timeline.
    • He was placed in a position to control the story afterward.
    • And the CIA chose him specifically because of that connection, not despite it.

    That’s no longer a theory. That’s a matter of record.

    🔚 Conclusion: The Handler Was Also the Editor

    The 2025 release doesn’t just show how evidence was buried. It shows who buried it-and how the government allowed it to happen, twice:

    • First, when Joannides ran covert ops tied to Oswald.
    • Then, when he was allowed to block access to the very files that could have exposed that connection.

    George Joannides didn’t just manage a Cuban exile group.

    He managed the limits of what we were allowed to know.

  • Oswald’s CIA File: When the Watchers Became the Editors

    Oswald’s CIA File: When the Watchers Became the Editors

    The 2025 JFK files reveal how the CIA manipulated Lee Harvey Oswald’s profile in real time-raising urgent questions about what they were hiding.

    🚪 Watching, But Not Warning

    Lee Harvey Oswald wasn’t some unknown name pulled out of nowhere on November 22, 1963. He had been on the radar of multiple U.S. intelligence agencies since at least 1959. But what the 2025 document release confirms is far more chilling:

    The CIA wasn’t just watching Oswald.

    They were editing and curating his file.

    And they were doing it in ways that misled other agencies, Congress, and the public.

    This isn’t speculation. It’s confirmed in their own memos.

    📁 The 201 File: A Timeline of Manipulation

    A “201 file” is the CIA’s main tracking file for foreign persons of interest. Oswald had one.

    But according to the 2025 records:

    • The file was opened late-in December 1960, more than a year after his defection to the USSR.
    • Crucial updates were omitted for years, despite Oswald returning to the U.S., marrying a Soviet citizen, and making public pro-Castro statements.
    • CIA staff flagged inconsistencies internally, but updates were delayed or blocked.

    Worse: After JFK’s assassination, the file was altered retroactively, making it appear as though Oswald was a low-level curiosity rather than a significant counterintelligence concern.

    🧠 Angleton’s Role: Counterintelligence Sleight of Hand

    James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s head of counterintelligence, looms large here again.

    The 2025 files show:

    • Angleton’s office was the central hub for Oswald file activity, and directly responsible for requests to suppress or “sanitize” internal mentions of Oswald.
    • Staff raised questions about Oswald’s movements and affiliations, but were instructed not to forward updates to the FBI or Secret Service.

    This resulted in an intelligence blind spot that was deliberately constructed.

    A 1963 memo unearthed in the latest batch reads:

    “Maintain current posture. Additional dissemination is not recommended at this time.”

    Translation: Keep this quiet. Don’t flag it to the rest of the government.

    🎭 The Paper Trail of Deception

    The 2025 documents also reveal how the CIA:

    • Blocked requests from the Warren Commission for full access to the 201 file.
    • Fed partial documents to the HSCA (House Select Committee) in the 1970s, edited to remove sensitive internal discussions.
    • Maintained a separate, internal-only version of the file with information that was never made public-until now.

    This was more than a cover-up. It was file laundering.

    🧩 Why This Matters Now

    Oswald’s CIA file was central to determining whether he was a lone gunman, a manipulated asset, or part of something more. By editing that file, the CIA didn’t just withhold the truth-they rewrote it.

    If Oswald’s profile was altered, redacted, and sanitized before and after the assassination, then every official investigation built on that file-Warren, HSCA, even public reporting-was starting with a false foundation.

    When the file is fake, the conclusion can’t be real.

    🔚 Conclusion: The Narrative Was the Operation

    With these 2025 revelations, it’s clear that Oswald’s CIA file wasn’t just a record.

    It was a weaponized narrative-curated, controlled, and used to steer public perception.

    And the people controlling it weren’t on the outside looking in.

    They were the ones who held the pen.

  • JFK vs. The CIA: A Battle That Ended in Dallas?

    JFK vs. The CIA: A Battle That Ended in Dallas?

    The newly released 2025 files reveal how deep the mistrust ran between President Kennedy and the CIA-and how his threats to dismantle the agency may have made him a target.

    🚪 Friends Turned Enemies

    Long before the motorcade rolled through Dealey Plaza, long before the shots were fired, a war was already brewing-between the President of the United States and his own intelligence community.

    The 2025 JFK files pull back the curtain on this long-suspected tension, revealing a level of distrust, isolation, and outright hostility between John F. Kennedy and the CIA that’s hard to overstate.

    This wasn’t a policy disagreement.

    It was a power struggle-and one that JFK seemed determined to win.

    🔥 The Bay of Pigs: The Beginning of the Break

    The rupture began with the Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961, a CIA-led disaster that attempted to overthrow Fidel Castro using Cuban exiles.

    The operation was a complete failure-and Kennedy was furious.

    🔥 “I want to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” - John F. Kennedy, privately after the invasion.

    The 2025 files include newly unredacted memos from inside the Agency describing “crisis containment efforts” after JFK’s backlash. Some CIA officers feared Kennedy would dismantle their covert operations arm entirely.

    One internal document-previously redacted-calls Kennedy’s response “destabilizing and threatening to long-term strategic assets.”

    🕵️‍♂️ The Rise of Countermeasures

    The more Kennedy distanced himself from the CIA, the more Langley pushed back.

    The files reveal:

    • Plans to tighten internal secrecy following Kennedy’s White House probes.
    • A proposal by a senior officer to “create operational insulation” between the Agency’s field activities and White House oversight.
    • Internal communications referring to JFK and RFK as “adversaries of agency continuity.”

    One memo, dated late 1962, explicitly warns that Kennedy’s initiatives “undermine operational autonomy and pose a risk to long-term agency viability.”

    That’s bureaucratic speak for: “This president is a problem.”

    📁 The Pentagon-CIA Alliance

    JFK also clashed with the military brass, particularly over Vietnam. He favored withdrawal; they wanted escalation. The 2025 files hint at an unofficial alignment between hawks at the Pentagon and top CIA strategists-sharing intel, circumventing presidential directives, and protecting joint Cold War agendas.

    A buried memo marked “Sensitive-Eyes Only” discusses plans for “strategic continuity in the event of a leadership vacuum.”
    That phrase raises serious questions.

    Was the CIA preparing for Kennedy’s replacement?

    Or merely anticipating instability?

    Either way, they weren’t aligned with him-they were preparing around him.

    🧩 Why This Changes the Narrative

    JFK’s assassination has often been painted as a tragedy of circumstance. But the 2025 files reframe it as the potential climax of an institutional rebellion.

    This wasn’t a rogue agent or lone gunman operating in a vacuum.

    This was a moment built on years of friction, mistrust, and political threats.

    When the president is talking about destroying the CIA,
    and the CIA is talking about insulating itself from the president,
    you don’t need a conspiracy theory.
    You need a flowchart.

    🔚 Conclusion: Was Kennedy Too Dangerous for the Establishment?

    We may never know every detail of what happened on November 22, 1963. But the 2025 documents strip away any illusions about the harmony between JFK and his intelligence network.

    They weren’t on the same team.

    They weren’t even in the same game.

    And the final move was made in broad daylight.