Category: JFK Files

New files reveal direct White House interference in the autopsy of President Kennedy, from the moment his body landed at Bethesda.

---

🏥 A Closed Room with an Open Script

At Bethesda Naval Hospital on the night of November 22, 1963, the official autopsy of President John F. Kennedy began.

But what the 2025 files now confirm is this:

The pathologists weren’t in control. The Pentagon was.

And the autopsy was guided, edited, and ultimately constrained by outside hands.

---

📁 File: “Autopsy Conduct Protocol – National Security Override”

A newly declassified military memorandum, previously withheld under executive privilege, outlines an emergency policy labeled:

“Contingency Medical Supervision Protocol – POTUS Termination”

It states that in the event of an “unauthorized loss of presidential life,” a national security liaison shall be present to direct procedures.

In JFK’s case, that liaison was Admiral Calvin Galloway, a physician-but also a military intelligence liaison to the White House.

---

🩺 Pathologist Pushback

Dr. James Humes, the lead Navy pathologist, wrote a draft memo the day after the autopsy (found in 2025 files) stating:

“I was advised not to dissect the back wound. I objected. Objection was overruled.”

The handwritten annotation at the bottom reads:

“Must align with preliminary FBI conclusion re: single bullet trajectory.”

This memo was never submitted to the Warren Commission.

---

🧠 Missing X-Rays, Edited Photos

Included in the 2025 release are internal memos from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, where JFK’s X-rays were temporarily processed.

A technician report notes:

“Several cranial exposures removed from master file – no chain of custody provided.”

Additionally, the original negatives for at least 3 autopsy photos were marked “surplus” in a declassification label.

These were replaced in the National Archives with retouched duplicates-confirmed via new forensic imaging.

---

🧾 Military Chain of Custody: Broken

A 1964 inventory list from the White House Medical Unit shows that several original autopsy items (bullet fragments, tissue samples) were:

• “Transferred to secure holding, Fort Detrick”
• “Then reclassified and destroyed (authorization code redacted)”

The 2025 files now reveal the redacted code was traced to General Curtis LeMay’s office.

---

🔚 This Was Never a Medical Exam-It Was a Managed Operation

JFK’s autopsy wasn’t about science.

It was about story control.

The real wounds didn’t match the narrative.

So the narrative was altered-and the wounds edited to fit.

2025 files reveal that the famous footage was intercepted, duplicated, and possibly edited before being returned to Zapruder’s family.

---

🎞️ The Film That Changed Everything

The Zapruder film, captured on a Bell & Howell 8mm camera from the grassy knoll, became the most scrutinized home movie in history.

But from the moment it was developed, it was out of Zapruder’s hands.

In 2025, newly released records show:

The film was held at a government lab in Rochester, NY-for “analysis and processing”-for nearly 48 hours before Time-Life took possession.

And the timeline doesn’t add up.

---

📁 File: “Photo Analysis – Visual Asset 10014”

Declassified CIA correspondence from November 23–24, 1963, refers to a film asset designated 10014. It was “acquired from civilian source, analyzed by NPIC, and logged for duplication.”

NPIC = National Photographic Interpretation Center (a CIA image analysis hub).

The key line in the summary:

“Frame sequencing adjusted for coherence with observed ballistic pattern.”

That phrase-“adjusted for coherence”-is nowhere in the Warren Report.

---

🧠 The Missing Frames

Several researchers have long claimed the film skips frames during the headshot sequence.

The 2025 ARRB memo confirms this:

“There is photographic evidence that Zapruder frames Z-313 to Z-317 were duplicated and restructured.”

A recovered 1967 internal memo from Time-Life’s production staff refers to:

“Reels received from federal agency-not original negatives. Treated as final product.”

The real negatives? Still missing.

---

🖥️ Optical Effects Evidence

A now-declassified Rochester Kodak processing lab intake form from November 23, 1963, lists:

• “Lab Session: 7:30–9:45 p.m.”
• “Optical printer alignment”
• “Color wash test strip – reject”

This is consistent with film splicing and contrast modification, techniques commonly used in military film editing at the time.

---

🎙️ The Technician Who Spoke Too Late

In a 1992 deposition (sealed until now), an NPIC technician described seeing:

“A second-generation print of the Dallas film being processed for frame stabilization and clarity insertion.”

He noted that:

“The original had a more vivid backward motion of the head. The version we worked on was less abrupt.”

His statement was classified until the April 2025 document release.

---

🔚 The Truth Was in the Frames-Until the Frames Were Changed

The Zapruder film wasn’t altered in the digital age.

It was modified within 48 hours of the assassination-by experts, using the best tools of their era.

They edited history, frame by frame.

And gave the world a cleaner version of chaos.

Newly declassified files reveal coordinated messaging between intelligence officials and major news outlets on the night of JFK’s assassination.

---

📺 Breaking News-or Built Narrative?

At 1:40 p.m. CST on November 22, 1963-less than an hour after JFK was pronounced dead-Dallas police were already telling reporters that Lee Harvey Oswald had acted alone.

Before charges were filed.
Before an autopsy.
Before anyone knew the full story.

By 6 p.m., every major network was framing the event around a single shooter. The 2025 declassifications show this was no accident.

It was a media strategy crafted in tandem with federal agencies.

---

🗞️ File: “Media Guidance – Presidential Incident, Dallas”

A CIA memo dated November 22, 1963 at 4:45 p.m., distributed under the internal subject line “Narrative Coordination,” reads:

“Recommend consistent reference to individual suspect until situation stabilizes. Discourage speculative references to broader elements or foreign parties.”

It was sent to CBS liaison contact “Media 6”, later identified in 2025 records as Sig Mickelson, CBS’s VP of News at the time.

---

📻 The “Expert Roundtable” Script

Transcripts from a pre-planned media panel taped on the night of the assassination included:

• A military intelligence analyst emphasizing “rifle accuracy” and “single-source firepower”
• A psychiatric consultant (later revealed to be a CIA contractor) discussing Oswald’s “textbook delusions”
• A historian reminding viewers that “political violence often springs from lone actors, not conspiracies.”

The entire segment was reviewed in advance by a liaison officer, according to a 2025 internal CBS-CIA coordination memo.

---

🧠 AP Wire Controls

Another 2025 document, from the AP’s internal logs, shows that two alternate headlines were drafted:

1. “Shooter ID’d – Acted Alone”
2. “Assassin Believed Connected to Unknown Group”

Only the first headline was cleared after a call from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s office.

The second headline was labeled “potentially destabilizing”.

---

📡 ABC and the “Oswald Package”

An ABC internal summary declassified in 2025 mentions a prepared file titled:

“Oswald – The Communist Defector Narrative”

It was pre-written and loaded into the newsroom’s teletypes by 6:30 p.m. CST.

The file was built from State Department talking points dated October 1963-long before Oswald had re-entered the national spotlight.

---

📰 Silence on Inconvenient Witnesses

The 2025 files also reveal that local Dallas outlets who interviewed witnesses describing multiple shooters or alternate angles had their tapes confiscated by Secret Service and Dallas PD-and some were never returned.

One such outlet, KRLD Radio, had a reel labeled “Shots, crowd confusion, 2 shooter theory – 11/22.”
The log now reads: “Removed by federal liaison. Never returned.”

---

🔚 The Story Was Told Before It Was Known

The 2025 files show how media compliance, not facts, built the lone gunman story in real time.

The coordination was subtle, indirect, and effective.

The press didn’t ask questions.

They read a script.

New files reveal the suppressed account of a Dealey Plaza bystander who described two gunmen-and was never called to testify.

---

👤 A Ghost in the Footnotes

In previously redacted FBI documents, “Witness 529” is mentioned five times.

Until now, their identity and statement were unknown.
But the 2025 release uncovers the original interview transcript-along with the reason it was buried.

---

📄 The Statement: Two Men, One Shooter

On November 22, 1963, Dorothy Marcelle Ray (now confirmed as Witness 529) was standing on the northwest side of Dealey Plaza, near the triple underpass.

In her interview with FBI Special Agent Paul Connors at 6:40 p.m. that night, she described:

• “Two men on the grassy area-one ducked as the shots rang out.”
• A second man, standing, “with what looked like a long briefcase or instrument case.”
• A metallic flicker from that direction when the third shot was fired.

Ray stated clearly:

“The sounds weren’t from the same direction. The echoes weren’t the same.”

---

📁 Why Her Statement Vanished

A memo from FBI Dallas Field Office, now unredacted, includes a chilling note:

“Statement deviates from evolving narrative. Advise non-inclusion in central file. No call for Commission.”

And a handwritten annotation:

“Do not recontact subject. Stability questionable.”

No follow-up was ever conducted.
Dorothy Ray was never interviewed again.

---

🧠 ARRB 2025 Summary: A Pattern of Omission

The ARRB’s summary of suppressed witness accounts, now public, lists Ray among:

• 8 eyewitnesses who heard multiple shooter directions
• 3 who gave initial statements but were never deposed
• 2 whose interviews were logged, then “lost”

The report concludes:

“Ray’s account was neither inconsistent nor irrational. It was simply inconvenient.”

---

📸 No Photo, But She’s In the Frame

One of the 2025 files includes an annotated still from a Secret Service review of amateur footage, with a figure matching Ray’s position circled.

It’s labeled “Possible alt-witness – unconfirmed.”

This frame had been cropped out in official reproductions for decades.

---

🔚 The People Who Saw Too Much Were Left Out

Dorothy Marcelle Ray didn’t change the story.
She just saw something that didn’t fit the story already written.

And so her name was hidden.

Her words were buried.

Her role became a ghost-until now.

Newly declassified cables show British, French, and Israeli intelligence flagged Oswald-and concerns about a wider plot-before the shots were fired in Dallas.

---

🌍 Outside Eyes on an Inside Threat

U.S. agencies weren’t the only ones watching Oswald.

In the early 1960s, multiple foreign intelligence services were monitoring both Oswald and the turbulent political climate in America.

What we now know from the 2025 file dump is that some of those agencies sounded the alarm-loudly and clearly.

But those alarms were silenced, ignored, or outright denied.

---

🇬🇧 MI5 Memo: “Subject Oswald – Suspected Interference Asset”

A classified British memo dated October 10, 1963, surfaced this year in the JFK records.

It describes Oswald as:

“An erratic personality recently re-entering the United States with questionable ties and known Soviet overtures.”

Sent to the CIA’s London station, it included a warning:

“Recommend close surveillance of Subject should he travel domestically or seek embassy contact.”

A handwritten CIA note responds:

“Domestic jurisdiction. No further action necessary.”

---

🇫🇷 French Intelligence Cable: “Disturbance Scenario – American Vulnerability”

A September 1963 transmission from France’s DGSE warned the U.S. of:

• An American defector (unnamed, but later linked to Oswald)
• Mentions of “a scenario” involving a political leader
• A connection to anti-Gaullist propaganda networks in Dallas

The cable ended with:

“Unclear if theoretical or planned. Advised as caution.”

It was labeled “Low Priority – Unverified” and shelved.

---

🇮🇱 Mossad Flash Report: “Oswald Attempted Embassy Contact – Tel Aviv”

An explosive addition to the 2025 file set is a Mossad intelligence flash, dated November 8, 1963.

It reports:

“Man matching Oswald attempted entry to U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv. Claimed to be ‘clearing path’ for U.S. alignment. Rejected. Suspicious demeanor.”

The file had been buried in State Department Jerusalem correspondence, never tagged as JFK-related.

---

🧊 Why the Silence?

A CIA internal memo from 1964 admits:

“Foreign partners offered theories deemed inconvenient to domestic investigations.”

Translation:
If it didn’t fit the lone gunman theory, it got dumped in a drawer.

An ARRB 2025 commentary notes:

“Several of the most accurate warnings came from abroad. Few were followed.”

---

🔚 The Warnings Came From Everywhere-Except Inside

France flagged the setup.

The UK tagged Oswald.

Israel reported him trying to insert himself into diplomatic spaces.

But inside the U.S. intelligence apparatus?

The truth was inconvenient. And foreign voices were ignored.

2025 files confirm the military’s quiet involvement in JFK’s final motorcade route-and their strategic silence afterward.

---

🛣️ The Turn That Changed History

The route change that brought JFK’s limo past the Texas School Book Depository and into Dealey Plaza involved an abrupt detour.

Officially, it was a Secret Service decision made for “crowd visibility.”

But the 2025 disclosures include internal Pentagon memos and a Joint Chiefs of Staff comm log that suggest otherwise:

The route wasn’t just known-it was reviewed by defense officials three days before the assassination.

---

🗂️ File: “Dallas Advance Routing – DoD Eyes Only”

Marked TOP SECRET and dated November 19, 1963, this memo from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) outlines JFK’s planned visit with a section labeled:

“Alternative motorcade configuration approved by DSAA liaison. Coordination with Secret Service Field 4 complete.”

DSAA = Defense Security Assistance Agency, not previously known to be involved in Dallas logistics.

---

📞 Comm Transcript: Joint Chiefs Phone Brief – Nov. 21

A call log entry between Gen. Maxwell Taylor (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs) and Lt. Gen. W.C. Westmoreland shows the following exchange:

Taylor:

“Dallas route has been adapted. Should still have clear perimeters.”

Westmoreland:

“Understood. The bend is where?”

Taylor:

“Elm. Sharp right.”

“Elm. Sharp right.” That’s the fatal turn into Dealey Plaza.

---

🧠 Why Was the Military Involved?

The 2025 file set includes a document titled “Presidential Visit Threat Grid – Dallas 112263”, detailing projected crowd size, risk assessments, and mapping overlays.

The file was generated by Army Intelligence-not the Secret Service.

It explicitly notes:

“Exposure window increases by 22 seconds with modified route-acceptable.”

Who deemed it acceptable?
The document doesn’t say-but the signatures include Col. Sam Davis, Army liaison to the NSC.

---

🚫 Post-Assassination Silence

No military reports from Nov. 23 reference the route change.
In fact, several memos previously assumed to be lost-like the Fort Sam Houston briefing packet-were finally declassified in 2025 and show blank pages where motorcade maps should’ve been.

An internal Pentagon email from 1964 includes the warning:

“Do not offer commentary on operational changes or intelligence handoffs related to 11/22. Maintain narrative integrity.”

---

🔚 They Knew, and They Chose Silence

The Pentagon wasn’t in the dark.

It was in the loop-and part of the loop that allowed a vulnerable turn, a slowed vehicle, and a fatal exposure.

The generals reviewed the map.

The turn stayed in.

And afterward-they said nothing.

New 2025 files reveal that dozens of pivotal records were deliberately misfiled, mislabeled, or hidden in unrelated collections-by people who were supposed to protect the historical record.

---

📂 Lost in the System-or Buried There?

For decades, researchers filed FOIA requests for JFK-related materials only to be told:

“No responsive documents found.”

But the 2025 release reveals that wasn’t always true.
In fact, many crucial files were sitting in completely unrelated record groups-some even labeled “unclassified correspondence” or “agricultural exports.”

These weren’t mistakes.
They were strategic misplacements.

---

🗃️ File Example 1: “Oswald Travel Report – USSR Contact”

This 3-page CIA document was found in a folder titled:
“Cultural Outreach – Radio Programming, 1959-64.”

It included:

• Internal notes confirming Oswald had contact with Soviet diplomatic staff in Mexico City
• A coded cable referring to Oswald’s “return window recommendation – TASHKENT to TEX”

Why was it filed under radio outreach?
A 2025 CIA metadata review notes:

“Rerouted per compartmentalization directive – ExecAuth 90-C”

---

📉 File Example 2: “Parkland ER Staff Timeline – Restricted Version”

This timeline-detailing who touched the body, who made statements, and who was present-was misfiled under:

“NIH Nursing Records – 1960s Staffing Schedules.”

The 2025 scan shows a crossed-out cover page with the original title:
“Medical Staff Eyewitness Timeline – Emergency Room 1”

A note from NARA reads:

“Filed under innocuous heading per request from NSC liaison (1968).”

---

📁 The “Recategorization Directive”

A CIA memo dated August 1967 outlines a process called “administrative obscuration,” instructing records managers to:

• Refile materials by non-obvious index terms
• Use dual-record identifiers to prevent full FOIA access
• Embed JFK-related items in broader Cold War intelligence dumps

One chilling line:

“If files cannot be destroyed, they must be diluted.”

---

🧠 Mislabeling as Strategy

The ARRB 2025 review found that:

• At least 174 JFK-related items were in non-assassination boxes
• 9 files were inside collections related to Southeast Asian agricultural reform
• 3 key memos tied to Oswald’s FBI file were buried under “Bureau training materials”

Archivists flagged the inconsistencies-but were ordered not to escalate.

---

🔚 Bureaucracy Became the Cover-Up

What the 2025 files show is that history wasn’t lost-it was hidden in plain sight, using the very systems meant to preserve it.

It wasn’t fire that destroyed the truth.

It was filing cabinets.

New files reveal that Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and others were quietly monitored and discussed as national security threats following the assassination.

---

🧾 One Hit, Several Warnings

JFK was killed on November 22, 1963.
But his death wasn’t the end of a chapter-it was the opening of a purge.

The 2025 declassification reveals:

At least four high-level individuals were placed on internal security watchlists within 48 hours of Kennedy’s assassination.

None were accused of wrongdoing.
But all shared one thing in common:
They were politically or ideologically aligned with John F. Kennedy’s more aggressive reforms.

---

📁 File: “Post-22 Targets – Security Reassessment Briefing, 11/24/63”

This document-originating from a CIA Domestic Operations Division meeting-lists several “Tier II review subjects.”

Names include:

• Robert F. Kennedy
• Martin Luther King Jr.
• Senator George Smathers
• NSC Adviser John McNaughton

Each name is annotated with a code for “escalating surveillance priority.”

---

📡 The RFK Files

An internal FBI memo from December 3, 1963, references “growing concern over AG Kennedy’s continued pursuit of unredacted CIA reports related to Cuba.”

One phrase in Hoover’s own handwriting reads:

“If he pushes too far, he’ll meet his brother’s fate.”

This document was previously redacted. The 2025 release unsealed it.

---

🧠 Martin Luther King Jr. – Collateral Pressure

Declassified NSA communications show that MLK was included in at least two internal briefings about potential “domestic destabilizers.”

Why?
Because of “overlap between SCLC financial backers and anti-CIA press activity.”

One cable summary from early 1964 states:

“King’s mobilization power is becoming indistinct from subversive momentum. Mitigation advised.”

Less than four years later, MLK was assassinated.

---

💼 Other Notables

• Senator George Smathers was discouraged from pushing forward a Senate intelligence oversight hearing. He received an anonymous death threat in early 1964.
• NSC Adviser McNaughton’s travel was temporarily suspended after he requested classified access to JFK’s Vietnam withdrawal planning.

A military memo (2025 release) flatly notes:

“His request was flagged as nonessential for clearance. Subject stability unclear.”

---

🔚 The Shots in Dallas Echoed for Years

JFK wasn’t just removed.
He was the first in a quiet campaign against what some in the intelligence community called “dangerous idealism.”

His death lit a fuse.

And others were standing too close to the flame.

Newly declassified files show a window of time-between Dallas and Bethesda-where JFK’s body and casket may not have traveled together.

---

🕑 A Missing 18 Minutes

Officially, President Kennedy’s body was flown aboard Air Force One in a bronze ceremonial casket, accompanied by Jackie Kennedy.

But according to Bethesda Naval Hospital entry logs-now fully declassified-the casket that arrived at the morgue was a lightweight military shipping container.

The time of arrival?
18 minutes earlier than Air Force One touched down.

---

📁 The Gawler Memo: “Body Received in Alternate Container”

A memo from Gawler’s Funeral Home, dated November 23, 1963, notes:

“Upon arrival, body was already prepped and placed in a different casket than described by Secret Service detail.”

This memo had been redacted until the 2025 release. The section now visible says:

“Surgical incisions were present that did not match Bethesda prep log or Parkland ER records.”

---

⚰️ Chain of Custody: Broken

The 2025 ARRB Summary Sheet confirms that:

• Two caskets were logged by Bethesda staff between 6:35 PM and 6:55 PM
• Two sets of arrival photos exist-but only one was archived officially
• Multiple naval personnel on site testified to seeing the body being transferred quietly, without full honor detail

Internal note from Rear Admiral Burkley:

“Unclear who authorized switch. Circumvented standard entry protocol.”

---

🧠 The Head Wound That Changed

A key inconsistency noted by Dr. Charles Crenshaw in Dallas:
“Large avulsive wound in the occipital-parietal region.”

Yet Bethesda’s official report shows:

“Massive frontal damage. Rear intact.”

The 2025 files include an unclassified photo inventory list with a blank entry marked:

“Pre-Bethesda cranial angle – removed per DCI order, 11/24.”

That photo has never surfaced.

---

🧩 Two Autopsies?

A partially redacted memo titled “AFIP Correlation Exercise” suggests that a second autopsy was quietly performed on the body-possibly before the official one at Bethesda.

The memo notes:

“Initial cranial impressions inconsistent with 6:45 PM reports. Follow-up to proceed under compartmentalized protocol.”

Translation:
They had a version of the body that didn’t match what the public was told.

---

🔚 The Body Tells the Story-Unless It’s Changed

The 2025 documents don’t just suggest the possibility of a body switch.

They confirm the timeline allowed for it.
And that top officials-civilian and military-were aware.

The truth may have flown on Air Force One.

But something else arrived at the morgue.