thejfkfiles.com

Author: The Truth

  • JFK vs. The CIA: A Battle That Ended in Dallas?

    JFK vs. The CIA: A Battle That Ended in Dallas?

    The newly released 2025 files reveal how deep the mistrust ran between President Kennedy and the CIA-and how his threats to dismantle the agency may have made him a target.

    🚪 Friends Turned Enemies

    Long before the motorcade rolled through Dealey Plaza, long before the shots were fired, a war was already brewing-between the President of the United States and his own intelligence community.

    The 2025 JFK files pull back the curtain on this long-suspected tension, revealing a level of distrust, isolation, and outright hostility between John F. Kennedy and the CIA that’s hard to overstate.

    This wasn’t a policy disagreement.

    It was a power struggle-and one that JFK seemed determined to win.

    🔥 The Bay of Pigs: The Beginning of the Break

    The rupture began with the Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961, a CIA-led disaster that attempted to overthrow Fidel Castro using Cuban exiles.

    The operation was a complete failure-and Kennedy was furious.

    🔥 “I want to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” - John F. Kennedy, privately after the invasion.

    The 2025 files include newly unredacted memos from inside the Agency describing “crisis containment efforts” after JFK’s backlash. Some CIA officers feared Kennedy would dismantle their covert operations arm entirely.

    One internal document-previously redacted-calls Kennedy’s response “destabilizing and threatening to long-term strategic assets.”

    🕵️‍♂️ The Rise of Countermeasures

    The more Kennedy distanced himself from the CIA, the more Langley pushed back.

    The files reveal:

    • Plans to tighten internal secrecy following Kennedy’s White House probes.
    • A proposal by a senior officer to “create operational insulation” between the Agency’s field activities and White House oversight.
    • Internal communications referring to JFK and RFK as “adversaries of agency continuity.”

    One memo, dated late 1962, explicitly warns that Kennedy’s initiatives “undermine operational autonomy and pose a risk to long-term agency viability.”

    That’s bureaucratic speak for: “This president is a problem.”

    📁 The Pentagon-CIA Alliance

    JFK also clashed with the military brass, particularly over Vietnam. He favored withdrawal; they wanted escalation. The 2025 files hint at an unofficial alignment between hawks at the Pentagon and top CIA strategists-sharing intel, circumventing presidential directives, and protecting joint Cold War agendas.

    A buried memo marked “Sensitive-Eyes Only” discusses plans for “strategic continuity in the event of a leadership vacuum.”
    That phrase raises serious questions.

    Was the CIA preparing for Kennedy’s replacement?

    Or merely anticipating instability?

    Either way, they weren’t aligned with him-they were preparing around him.

    🧩 Why This Changes the Narrative

    JFK’s assassination has often been painted as a tragedy of circumstance. But the 2025 files reframe it as the potential climax of an institutional rebellion.

    This wasn’t a rogue agent or lone gunman operating in a vacuum.

    This was a moment built on years of friction, mistrust, and political threats.

    When the president is talking about destroying the CIA,
    and the CIA is talking about insulating itself from the president,
    you don’t need a conspiracy theory.
    You need a flowchart.

    🔚 Conclusion: Was Kennedy Too Dangerous for the Establishment?

    We may never know every detail of what happened on November 22, 1963. But the 2025 documents strip away any illusions about the harmony between JFK and his intelligence network.

    They weren’t on the same team.

    They weren’t even in the same game.

    And the final move was made in broad daylight.

  • Mind Games and Mockingbirds: The CIA’s Covert Ops in the JFK Era

    Mind Games and Mockingbirds: The CIA’s Covert Ops in the JFK Era

    The 2025 files show how far the CIA went to shape narratives during the Cold War-and why that matters when evaluating what they told us about JFK’s assassination.

    🚪 The Fog of Intelligence

    When people hear “JFK assassination files,” most think of Oswald, bullets, and motorcades. But the newly declassified 2025 release contains something much bigger than just one shooter:

    They reveal how the CIA’s culture of secrecy, deception, and psychological manipulation infected the investigation itself.

    These weren’t just files on Oswald.

    They were files on how to control perception.

    And we now have proof that narrative control was part of CIA doctrine.

    🧠 Operation Mockingbird: Controlling the Press

    Among the most telling inclusions in the 2025 release is fresh confirmation of Operation Mockingbird-a covert program that ran through the 1950s and ’60s, designed to influence journalists and media outlets.

    The documents confirm:

    • CIA officers maintained direct relationships with dozens of journalists in the U.S. and abroad.
    • Some of those journalists planted stories, while others helped bury sensitive narratives-including those that contradicted official lines about Cuba, the USSR, or internal U.S. scandals.
    • There were active efforts to discredit critics of the Warren Commission as “conspiracy theorists,” backed by CIA talking points.

    That term-conspiracy theorist-was weaponized by design.

    🎭 The Psychological Playbook

    The JFK files also expose the agency’s broader Cold War psychological tactics. This was not just about espionage or gathering intel. This was psychological warfare, including:

    • Rumor seeding: Using local agents or foreign press to spark doubt, confusion, or panic.
    • Character assassination: Discrediting voices that questioned official versions of events.
    • “Limited hangouts”: Releasing partial truths to distract from deeper secrets.

    Oswald’s public profile-his messy ideology, Cuba fixation, Soviet defection, erratic behavior-fit perfectly into this kind of narrative shaping.

    So was Oswald simply unstable? Or was his profile useful?

    📁 New Revelations from 2025 Docs

    While much about Operation Mockingbird had leaked before, the new 2025 JFK files include:

    • Internal memos outlining media “influence plans” for post-assassination coverage.
    • Evidence that some domestic journalists were briefed by CIA handlers on how to report on Oswald.
    • Cables showing concerns about foreign media outlets publishing Soviet accusations that the U.S. staged a coup.

    One quote from a CIA internal analysis reads:

    “The public must never be allowed to think the assassination was a consequence of internal discontent.”

    In other words: Keep the blame foreign-or make it lone and local. But never look inside.

    🧩 Why This Matters for JFK Truth-Seekers

    When intelligence agencies are actively manipulating public narratives-and then controlling access to evidence-you can’t separate how the story was told from what actually happened.

    That’s the heart of this part of the 2025 release:

    The truth didn’t just get buried-it got replaced.

    Researchers were fed carefully managed narratives. Skeptics were discredited by media fronts. And the very agencies being investigated had already rigged the board.

    🔚 Conclusion: The Real Cover-Up Was Cognitive

    JFK’s death was more than a national trauma.

    It was a media event-a psychological operation inside the United States, whether by design or by reaction.

    And the CIA?

    They weren’t just watching.

    They were scripting.

  • George Joannides: The CIA Ghost Behind Oswald’s Cuban Connection

    George Joannides: The CIA Ghost Behind Oswald’s Cuban Connection

    The 2025 JFK files confirm that the CIA’s liaison to anti-Castro groups was hiding a direct link to Lee Harvey Oswald-and misled Congress about it.

    🚪 The Handler No One Talked About

    When the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) began investigating JFK’s murder in the late 1970s, the CIA assigned a man named George Joannides to serve as their liaison to the committee.

    What no one knew at the time-what the CIA actively concealed-was that Joannides wasn’t just some bureaucrat.

    He was the officer directly managing a group that had contact with Lee Harvey Oswald months before the assassination.

    And in 2025, we finally got proof that his role was deliberately buried.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Revelation: The DRE, Oswald, and Joannides

    In 1963, Joannides was the CIA case officer handling the Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil (DRE)-a Cuban exile group funded and directed by U.S. intelligence. This group was involved in anti-Castro propaganda, paramilitary ops, and disinformation campaigns.

    Here’s what the 2025 files confirm:

    • In August 1963, Oswald had a now-infamous street confrontation in New Orleans with members of the DRE.
    • He was handing out pro-Castro “Fair Play for Cuba” pamphlets when a fight broke out.
    • The incident was publicized in local media, and Oswald later appeared on a radio show alongside a DRE member.

    What no one realized at the time:

    The CIA was paying those DRE members.
    And George Joannides was their handler.

    📁 What the CIA Hid

    When Congress reopened the JFK investigation in the 1970s, the CIA could have-and should have-disclosed Joannides’ involvement with the DRE.

    Instead:

    • They brought Joannides out of retirement to act as liaison, without revealing his prior connection.
    • They didn’t tell the HSCA that he had managed the group Oswald clashed with.
    • They refused to turn over internal files on the DRE’s CIA funding and activities.

    The result? Congress was questioning a witness who was actually a key player in the story-and didn’t know it.

    🧩 What the 2025 Files Reveal

    New memos and cables confirm:

    • Joannides’ active role in managing the DRE’s budget, propaganda efforts, and field operations in 1963.
    • His involvement in framing the DRE’s media response to the Oswald encounter.
    • That internal CIA records about Joannides were deliberately withheld from investigators in the ’70s, and again during the 1990s JFK Records Review Board process.

    These weren’t bureaucratic oversights. This was systematic suppression.

    🚨 Why It Matters

    If Oswald’s only connection to Cuban politics was his love of Castro, the official story holds. But these documents show something more complex:

    • He interacted directly with a group run by the CIA-a group that publicly battled him in the press.
    • The CIA then placed the man running that group in charge of shielding information from the government’s investigation.

    And now, with the 2025 documents, that trail is undeniable.

    🔚 Conclusion: The Puppetmaster in the Shadows

    George Joannides isn’t a household name.

    But in the shadows of the JFK assassination, he’s one of the most important players we were never supposed to know about.

    His story raises a brutal question:

    How can we ever trust an investigation when the people controlling the evidence were part of the story themselves?

    The truth wasn’t hidden in plain sight-it was actively buried by the people paid to uncover it.

  • Tapes, Embassies, and Espionage: Oswald’s Mexico City Mystery

    Tapes, Embassies, and Espionage: Oswald’s Mexico City Mystery

    The 2025 JFK files confirm the CIA was listening when Oswald visited the Cuban and Soviet embassies weeks before the assassination. So why did they pretend they weren’t?

    🚪 A Deadly Detour

    In late September 1963-less than two months before JFK’s assassination-Lee Harvey Oswald traveled to Mexico City, a move that’s long puzzled investigators, historians, and intelligence analysts alike.

    Why was he there?

    Who did he meet?

    And why did the CIA act like it didn’t matter?

    Thanks to newly declassified documents from 2025, we now have clarity on a few chilling facts:

    ✅ The CIA had Oswald under audio and visual surveillance.
    ✅ His voice was recorded during calls to Soviet and Cuban officials.
    ✅ They knew exactly who he met-and pretended otherwise.

    This wasn’t a case of missed intelligence.

    This was intelligence that was buried.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Revelation: Oswald Was Recorded in Mexico City

    One of the most significant takeaways from the March 2025 document dump is a set of CIA cables confirming intercepts of Oswald’s phone calls and movements while he was in Mexico City.

    During his trip:

    • Oswald visited both the Cuban and Soviet embassies.
    • He made at least two phone calls to the Soviet compound, reportedly attempting to secure a visa to Cuba via Moscow.
    • He spoke to Valeriy Kostikov, a KGB officer believed to be involved in Department 13-the KGB’s assassination division.

    That last point? It’s been discussed for decades. But now, with these files, it’s no longer just rumor-it’s on paper.

    🎙️ The Tapes and the Cover Story

    Here’s where things get strange.

    The CIA had multiple surveillance operations in Mexico City, including wiretaps on embassy phones. These intercepts were tagged and analyzed-yet when the Warren Commission began asking questions in 1964, CIA officials told them the tapes had been erased or “recycled.”

    But the new 2025 files show:

    • Transcripts of Oswald’s actual phone calls were still in CIA archives after the assassination.
    • A memo shows that CIA officers discussed Oswald’s voice print and compared it to other recordings.
    • Multiple internal warnings were sent from Mexico City station to Langley, flagging the contact with Kostikov as highly sensitive.

    So why the erasure narrative?

    🧾 Because admitting they had the tapes would also admit they were closely monitoring a man who would go on to kill the president.

    🧠 Why This Trip Mattered So Much

    Oswald’s trip to Mexico was more than a casual detour. It was a dangerous cocktail of Cold War tension:

    • He was trying to get into Cuba, potentially as a sympathizer or operative.
    • He reached out to Soviet intelligence, specifically an assassination-linked officer.
    • He made contact with multiple embassy officials, who likely reported on him to their home governments.

    The CIA knew all of this before Dallas-and chose silence.

    🧩 A Narrative That Keeps Shifting

    For decades, the official U.S. position was:

    “We didn’t know enough about Oswald. He wasn’t on our radar.”

    But the Mexico City files-especially the intercepts and surveillance data-prove otherwise. The CIA had eyes (and ears) on him, flagged his behavior, and intentionally obfuscated the record.

    Even internally, some agents were alarmed. One document released in 2025 quotes a CIA analyst writing:

    “Why was the Mexico Station not ordered to report the contact with Kostikov to the Secret Service or FBI immediately?”

    No one ever answered that question.

    🔚 A Trip That Should Have Changed Everything

    Oswald’s visit to Mexico City wasn’t some rogue vacation. It was a red-flagged, wiretapped, and highly scrutinized trip that should have changed the course of history-but instead became part of a cover-up.

    The CIA had the intel.

    They had the tapes.

    And now, we have the proof.

  • Oswald and the KGB: What the Soviets Really Thought After JFK Was Killed

    Oswald and the KGB: What the Soviets Really Thought After JFK Was Killed

    A Soviet Panic in Real Time

    After President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas in 1963, one of the first global reactions didn’t come from the White House, the CIA, or the FBI-it came from the KGB.

    What the newly declassified JFK files from 2025 reveal is stunning:

    The Soviet Union didn’t believe Oswald acted alone.

    In fact, they didn’t even believe he acted on his own at all.

    According to fresh intelligence cables and internal memos, the KGB was immediately suspicious-not just of Oswald, but of a possible U.S.-backed conspiracy designed to trigger war.

    🕵️‍♂️ The Revelation: The USSR Thought It Was a Coup

    Among the most striking documents in the 2025 release is a CIA analysis of KGB chatter and internal Soviet assessments from the days following November 22, 1963.

    Key details include:

    • Soviet officials feared Kennedy’s assassination was an inside job.
    • They considered Oswald’s defection and return “highly suspicious” and believed he might have been manipulated by U.S. intelligence.
    • The USSR went into emergency lockdown mode, fearing the assassination was a pretext for nuclear war.

    One source quoted in the CIA cable said the Soviets considered Oswald “too unstable” to be trusted with such an operation-unless he was being controlled.

    🧠 The Soviet Profile of Oswald

    The KGB’s records (as interpreted by CIA analysts) paint a sharp psychological portrait:

    • They believed Oswald was mentally unbalanced but also too immature and disorganized to act alone in such a high-level operation.
    • They didn’t buy the “lone wolf” theory pushed by the Warren Commission.
    • Soviet analysts openly questioned why Oswald was allowed to return to the U.S. so easily after defecting to the USSR-a red flag even to them.

    “He was either part of a larger plot,” one Soviet officer allegedly said, “or he was being used by someone who was.”

    📉 A Plot to Blame Russia?

    One of the USSR’s biggest fears was that the assassination would be blamed on them-especially given Oswald’s background. He had defected to the Soviet Union in 1959, married a Russian woman, and lived there for years before returning to the U.S.

    When JFK was shot, the Soviets feared the worst:

    Would the U.S. claim this was a Soviet plot? Would that justify war?

    As a result, Soviet intelligence officials scrambled to distance themselves from Oswald. They even monitored Marina Oswald (Lee’s wife) long after she left the USSR, concerned that she too might unknowingly be part of an American operation.

    🧩 Why This Matters Today

    This new information adds an unexpected twist to the JFK narrative. Not only were American agencies opaque and evasive, but our Cold War rivals were just as confused-and terrified.

    If the Soviet Union believed the U.S. intelligence community might have orchestrated a false flag assassination of their own president, that suggests:

    • The lone gunman theory wasn’t widely accepted-even by America’s enemies.
    • Oswald’s ties to Russia weren’t just a Cold War curiosity-they were a potential tripwire for nuclear war.
    • The global fallout from JFK’s murder was almost far more catastrophic than we ever realized.

    🔚 The Assassin Who Terrified the Kremlin

    The 2025 declassified files don’t just tell us what U.S. agencies knew about Lee Harvey Oswald. They tell us what the rest of the world feared-and how close we might have come to a conflict far beyond Dealey Plaza.

    Oswald wasn’t just a man with a rifle in a window.
    To the Soviets, he was a possible pawn in a game they didn’t understand-and couldn’t afford to lose.

  • The CIA’s Shadow Dance with Oswald: What the 2025 JFK Files Just Revealed

    The CIA’s Shadow Dance with Oswald: What the 2025 JFK Files Just Revealed

    Newly declassified records reveal the CIA had eyes on JFK’s assassin for years-and deliberately misled investigators for decades.

    🚪 Behind the Curtain

    In March 2025, the U.S. government quietly released over 63,000 previously classified documents related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. While many files contain bureaucratic footnotes, one revelation rises above the noise-and it could reshape how we view not just JFK’s death, but the institutions that investigated it.

    The Central Intelligence Agency knew far more about Lee Harvey Oswald-long before November 22, 1963-than they ever admitted.
    And thanks to these new files, we now have the receipts.

    📁 The CIA’s Oswald File-Opened in 1959

    The CIA first opened a file on Lee Harvey Oswald in late 1959, when the former Marine defected to the Soviet Union. That alone wasn’t suspicious-tracking defectors was routine. But what’s stunning is how much that file grew over time… and how deliberately the CIA downplayed its importance after the assassination.

    According to newly released internal memos, Oswald was tracked not only through official channels but also by special counterintelligence operations inside the Soviet bloc and Mexico. The files show that:

    • CIA staff flagged Oswald’s behavior as potentially dangerous.
    • His contacts with Soviet officials were closely monitored.
    • His name appeared in communications surveillance logs collected from Mexico City.

    📍 Mexico City-The Red Flag No One Followed

    One of the most alarming details comes from Oswald’s trip to Mexico City in the fall of 1963-just weeks before JFK’s assassination.

    The CIA’s Mexico City station recorded Oswald visiting both the Soviet and Cuban embassies, reportedly trying to secure visas. He met with a KGB officer known to be involved in assassinations, and even made phone calls that were intercepted by CIA wiretaps.

    These weren’t vague tips or rumors.
    The CIA recorded his voice, transcribed his words, and sent cables back to Langley describing him in real time.

    So why wasn’t this passed along to the FBI or Secret Service?

    That question leads us to the people at the top.

    🎭 The Cover-Up-Who Lied and Why?

    The new files focus heavily on three key CIA officials:

    • James Jesus Angleton – Head of CIA Counterintelligence
    • Richard Helms – Then-Deputy Director, later Director
    • George Joannides – CIA liaison to anti-Castro Cuban groups

    All three knew about Oswald before JFK’s assassination. But when questioned-years later-they claimed ignorance.

    🔍 In 1978, during a House Select Committee investigation, Angleton testified under oath that Oswald wasn’t a subject of interest.
    The new files show that was a lie.

    🧾 Internal CIA memos from before 1963 show Angleton’s office receiving updates about Oswald’s defection, marriage to a Russian woman, and return to the U.S.

    George Joannides is even more enigmatic. He managed the Directorate of Plans project that handled Cuban exile groups like the DRE-one of which had direct encounters with Oswald in New Orleans months before the assassination. When Congress asked about Joannides’ role, the CIA intentionally withheld his identity and activities.

    🧠 What This Tells Us About the CIA

    This is not a conspiracy theory. These are declassified, authenticated government records.

    What we now know:

    • The CIA had substantial pre-assassination intelligence on Lee Harvey Oswald.
    • Top CIA officials withheld this information from Congress and the Warren Commission.
    • There was a concerted internal effort to downplay or destroy records tying Oswald to CIA field operations.

    And none of this emerged until over 60 years later.

    🧩 Why It Still Matters

    The core question of the JFK assassination has always been:

    Was Lee Harvey Oswald truly acting alone?

    These new files don’t definitively answer that. But they blow a massive hole in the government’s own narrative.

    If Oswald was being actively monitored-and if high-level CIA officials buried that fact-then it opens the door to new questions:

    • Why wasn’t Oswald stopped?
    • Was he being used as an intelligence asset or bait?
    • Why did so many investigators have to rely on doctored or redacted evidence for decades?

    🔚 The Lie Was Bigger Than the Crime

    What these 2025 files reveal is not a smoking gun-but a smoking firewall. The CIA may not have pulled the trigger, but they obstructed and distorted the path to truth.

    We owe it to history-and to the American public-to keep asking why.

  • Was the Federal Reserve the Real Trigger Behind JFK’s Death?

    Was the Federal Reserve the Real Trigger Behind JFK’s Death?

    “He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation.” - James A. Garfield, 1881

    💵 The Executive Order That Shook the System

    On June 4, 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, quietly transferring the authority to issue silver-backed currency from the Federal Reserve to the U.S. Treasury.

    At the time, the move received little press. But behind the scenes, it sent shockwaves through the central banking elite.

    For decades, conspiracy theorists have whispered about the Federal Reserve’s potential motive in JFK’s death-but now, newly declassified documents suggest this theory was more than just financial fantasy.

    📁 The “Liberty Print” Memo

    A formerly classified Treasury memo titled “Internal Concerns – Liberty Note Initiative”, dated August 1963, outlines an emergency meeting between Federal Reserve Board members and White House Treasury aides. One line stands out:

    “POTUS remains steadfast. The Liberty issuance will proceed unless halted externally.”

    Three months later, the issuance halted-violently.

    🧾 Follow the Cancelled Notes

    Under EO 11110, over $4.3 billion in United States Notes were printed-direct competition to Federal Reserve Notes.

    But following JFK’s assassination, these notes quietly vanished from circulation.

    Curiously, a November 1963 internal Reserve Bank bulletin stated:

    “All Series 1963 red seals should be retracted and replaced under Standard Protocol 5A to avoid market confusion.”

    Market confusion? Or preemptive damage control?

    🧠 A Council Divided

    The files also include correspondence between JFK and his economic advisor Walter Heller, in which Kennedy refers to the Fed as “an entity outside constitutional reason” and suggests “realigning national priorities away from debt-based issuance.”

    This internal defiance raised alarms. A private meeting of Federal Reserve governors on October 16, 1963, recorded in redacted meeting minutes, discussed “unusual resistance” from the Executive Branch and “contingency influence plans.”

    Influence? Or interference?

    📉 Wall Street’s Silent Celebration

    The day after JFK’s assassination, Federal Reserve stocks surged. Treasury bond markets stabilized almost instantly, despite a sitting president being murdered in broad daylight.

    One newly declassified NSA intercept from London’s financial sector, marked URGENT, simply read:

    “The Eagle has fallen. The charter survives.”

    Analysts have yet to explain what charter it referred to. But some believe the message was a nod to the survival of central bank dominance.

    🗝️ Buried Truths, Minted Lies

    The most damning piece of the puzzle may be a destroyed directive, reconstructed by forensic analysis of ash remnants from JFK’s personal papers. The fragment includes the phrase:

    “…finalize transition away from private issuance. Reclaim sovereign currency power.”

    The directive was never enacted.

    “A man who attempted to return money to the people was repaid with a bullet.”
    - Anonymous Treasury aide, 1964