Author: The Truth

  • Feature: Australia’s Hidden Role in the JFK Assassination Files​

    Feature: Australia’s Hidden Role in the JFK Assassination Files​

    They called once. Then again. Both times, they were ignored.

    When the JFK files dropped in 2025, most eyes turned to Langley, to Dallas, to Havana.

    But buried deep in a document trail long overlooked was a trail of warnings, miscommunications, and political panic that led halfway around the world-to Canberra.

    Australia, known more for its beaches than its intelligence operations, turns out to have played a small but significant role in the events surrounding President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

    And for over sixty years, that role was kept quiet-buried under a pile of redactions and diplomatic nods.

    It started, as these things often do, with a phone call.


    THE FIRST WARNING

    On October 15, 1962, a man with a heavy accent called the U.S. Embassy in Canberra. He claimed to be Polish. He also claimed something more dangerous:

    “A plot to assassinate President Kennedy is being planned by agents from Iron Curtain countries… A reward of $100,000 has been promised to whoever kills him.”

    The embassy typed it up. A classified cable was sent. The Australians were informed. Nothing happened.

    Because who would believe a mysterious Polish driver of the Soviet Embassy?


    SAME VOICE. DIFFERENT DATE.

    On November 23, 1963, just one day after Kennedy was killed in Dallas, the same man called back. This time he didn’t warn of the future-he recounted the present:

    “The Russians here in Canberra celebrated last night. There was vodka, cheering. They toasted Kennedy’s death.”

    This time, he gave more details. He said he overheard names. He said he saw a suitcase being delivered. He said there was a man involved-an Australian. A man who had recently flown to America.

    The call was logged. The CIA received it. ASIO took a copy. Again, no action.


    CD-971: THE DOCUMENT THAT DISAPPEARED

    The two phone calls were eventually compiled into a document labeled CD-971. It was meant to be reviewed by the Warren Commission. It never was.

    Instead, the document was sealed. Australia requested it be buried. CIA agreed.

    For decades, CD-971 was classified not for national security-but for diplomatic embarrassment.

    And now, thanks to the 2025 release, we know why.


    THE SPRY-HELMS EXCHANGE

    Sir Charles Spry was no amateur. The head of ASIO from 1950 to 1970, he was fiercely anti-Communist, secretive, and close with the CIA. When he saw CD-971 on a release list in 1968, he panicked.

    He wrote directly to Richard Helms, then Director of Central Intelligence. The letter, now declassified, is careful but clear:

    “The disclosure of this document risks compromising operations, methods, and facilities that neither of our nations would wish made public…”

    Translated? If this gets out, everyone will know there’s a CIA base in Canberra. And that ASIO helped suppress a lead on JFK’s assassination.

    Helms agreed. CD-971 stayed sealed.


    WHY IT MATTERS

    You could argue that the calls were fake. That the man was drunk, or delusional, or fabricating stories for attention. ASIO certainly did.

    But here’s what matters: He called before the assassination. Then again after. He gave names. He gave descriptions. He mentioned movements.

    And both the U.S. and Australia chose to say: nothing to see here.


    INTELLIGENCE BY OMISSION

    ASIO’s internal memos show clear discomfort. A March 1964 file noted:

    “While the veracity of the caller is in doubt, the timeline and content suggest further inquiry may have been warranted.”

    But no inquiry happened. In fact, according to a now-declassified cable, ASIO instructed the U.S. Embassy to treat the matter as “closed unless new information is presented.”

    The Americans complied.


    WHY KEEP IT SECRET?

    There are two theories.

    One: The call was real. ASIO and the CIA buried it because they missed it. Embarrassment is a powerful silencer.

    Two: The call pointed too close to something real. A suitcase. A man flying to Dallas. Soviet Embassy staff cheering. Too much heat.

    Either way, CD-971 vanished from the conversation for over half a century.


    THE 2025 REVELATIONS

    When the Biden-Trump executive order (yes, you read that right) led to the full declassification of all JFK records in 2025, CD-971 resurfaced.

    Along with it: six other documents referencing “ASIO–CIA liaison protocols” and “international lead suppression.”

    One of those included a curious postscript:

    “Australia expresses ongoing concern about being named in assassination-related materials.”

    Another included a memo from 1969, in which an American diplomat in Canberra warns:

    “There is a risk that anti-war elements or press in Australia will connect the embassy calls to the broader narrative of intelligence failures in Dallas.”

    They never did. Until now.


    WHO WAS THE CALLER?

    We still don’t know. But the CIA’s internal analysis, included in the 2025 release, speculates he may have been a Soviet defector-or a double agent.

    One field report from 1963 even lists a “Polish-national chauffeur” suspected of leaking information.

    Another memo suggests he may have been part of a disinformation campaign.

    Which begs the question: If he was a Soviet plant… why hide it?


    THE SILENCE DOWN UNDER

    ASIO has remained characteristically tight-lipped. Even after the 2025 declassification, no Australian official has publicly commented on CD-971.

    But internal Department of Foreign Affairs memos now released show that Australia was briefed in 1976 that CD-971 “could eventually be made public.”

    Their recommendation? Delay, deflect, deny.


    WHAT ELSE IS MISSING?

    CD-971 is a flashpoint not because of what it says-but what it implies.

    That allied nations were involved, however lightly, in shaping the official story.

    That intelligence-sharing agreements extended to mutually agreed suppression.

    That leads-even bizarre ones-were buried not after being debunked, but before being explored.


    A GLOBAL COVER-UP?

    No. But a global embarrassment? Absolutely.

    Australia didn’t kill Kennedy. But they might have had a clue. And rather than face scrutiny, they closed the file.

    Just like the CIA. Just like the FBI. Just like the Warren Commission.


    AND THEN WHAT?

    The man who called never surfaced again. The alleged suitcase? Never found. The Australian traveler to Dallas? Never identified.

    But the idea that a random man in Canberra might have known something-something the intelligence community didn’t want known-has now been written back into history.

    Because thanks to the 2025 files, CD-971 is no longer buried.

    It’s public.

    And that changes everything.

  • The CIA Officers Who Tried to Blow the Whistle

    The CIA Officers Who Tried to Blow the Whistle

    Declassified internal complaints reveal quiet resistance from agents disturbed by how Oswald’s case-and the assassination aftermath-were handled.


    🚪 The Silence Wasn’t Total

    While the official CIA position was one of cold control and tight messaging, the 2025 records expose something else happening behind the scenes:

    Pockets of internal protest, ignored warnings, and career-ending resistance from within the Agency.

    These weren’t conspiracy theorists.

    They were analysts, case officers, and surveillance techs-and they knew the story didn’t add up.


    📁 Redacted No More: The Dunn Memo

    An internal complaint filed on December 3, 1963 by tech officer Gerald Dunn (heavily redacted until now), stated:

    “It is impossible to reconcile our Mexico City intercepts with the timeline being presented to the public.”

    Dunn was removed from field duty two weeks later.

    His personnel file includes the vague notation:

    “Disposition: administrative reassignment due to morale conflict.”


    🧠 The Warren Pushback: “We’re Being Used”

    Another internal memo from early 1964 quotes a CIA liaison to the Warren Commission:

    “This is not a fact-finding mission. This is damage control.”

    The author, believed to be Richard L. Cain, wrote privately to a colleague:

    “We are being told to omit anything that complicates the lone gunman scenario.”

    Cain’s access to the investigation was revoked two weeks later.


    🕵️‍♂️ The Surveillance Analyst Who Saw Too Much

    An NSA-CIA crossover report notes a Mexico City audio tech flagged an Oswald tape as “inconsistent with known voiceprint” and suggested it was someone posing as Oswald.

    The tech was advised to “avoid further conclusions outside operational scope.”

    That tape?
    “Lost in transfer.”


    🔥 “The Quiet Files” Initiative

    By spring 1964, the Agency launched a project internally labeled “QUIET FILES.” The goal?

    • Identify personnel expressing dissent
    • Document “non-aligned narrative behavior”
    • Preempt any whistleblowing with “non-promotion pathways”

    The strategy worked.

    Many voices went silent-not because they were wrong, but because they were buried.


    🔚 Suppressed from Within

    For decades, public researchers were gaslit, ridiculed, and dismissed.

    But now we know-some of the CIA’s own people were saying the same things.

    The problem wasn’t just what the CIA told us.

    It was what they refused to hear from their own.

  • Codename LARKSPUR: The Mysterious Operative Erased After November 22

    Codename LARKSPUR: The Mysterious Operative Erased After November 22

    The 2025 JFK files expose a previously unknown asset-or operative-linked to Oswald, Cuba, and the CIA’s darkest corners.


    🚪 A Name in the Static

    Tucked away in a stack of declassified intercepts is a name that didn’t appear in any previous investigations: LARKSPUR.

    The name shows up in:

    • A CIA cable referencing “active Havana routing via LARKSPUR”
    • An NSA intercept mentioning a “confirmed meeting between [REDACTED] and LARKSPUR, location Mexico City, Nov. 2”

    The strange thing?

    After Nov. 22, no further references appear.

    Anywhere.


    📁 Who-or What-Was LARKSPUR?

    The 2025 documents offer several possible clues:

    • A partially declassified briefing describes LARKSPUR as “a trusted intermediary with Latin American access points”
    • An earlier memo from 1962 identifies LARKSPUR as “used in Cuban informant operations, not officially on the books”
    • The language consistently places LARKSPUR outside official CIA personnel channels-suggesting a freelance spy, double agent, or cutout

    🧠 LARKSPUR and Oswald: The Lost Link?

    A Nov. 5, 1963 intercept from Mexico City reads:

    “LARKSPUR requests clarification on ‘LEE’s handling protocol’ if contact is re-established.”

    Who was “LEE”?

    The files don’t say outright-but the Mexico City timeline places Oswald there that week.

    What kind of “handling protocol” was needed?

    For a lone nut?


    🔥 Scrubbed Clean

    By Nov. 23, 1963, internal documents begin referencing a “sensitive phaseout” of an unnamed operative. One memo notes:

    “Assets under Havana routing to be retired, cover removed. LARKSPUR included.”

    A week later, LARKSPUR disappears completely.

    There’s no closure. No final cable. No termination record.

    Even in internal file inventories, LARKSPUR’s name is struck through by hand.


    🕵️‍♂️ Parallel to Other Cutouts

    Researchers now speculate LARKSPUR may have functioned similarly to:

    • George Joannides’ DRE contacts
    • David Atlee Phillips’ informant rings in Mexico City
    • Or even James Angleton’s “off-books” CI assets

    But there’s no confirmation.
    Only a name-and its sudden erasure.


    🔚 Erased, But Not Forgotten

    The JFK records dump of 2025 gave us names, faces, and files.

    But in the case of LARKSPUR, we got something more disturbing:
    A missing piece that someone worked very hard to hide.

    Maybe LARKSPUR was the missing thread between Oswald, Cuba, and Langley.

    Or maybe they were something even stranger: the one who got too close to the truth.

  • The Silence of Johnson: What LBJ Knew-and What He Didn’t Say

    The Silence of Johnson: What LBJ Knew-and What He Didn’t Say

    Newly released memos and call logs show LBJ was looped in early-and stayed strategically quiet.


    🚪 The Vice President Turned President

    Lyndon B. Johnson took the oath of office on Air Force One, just hours after Kennedy’s death. But the 2025 files show he wasn’t as shocked as the American public.

    According to CIA and FBI records, LBJ was briefed on Oswald’s background within 90 minutes of the shooting.

    The documents don’t prove foreknowledge. But they reveal strategic restraint, rapid narrative shaping, and behind-the-scenes orchestration.


    📁 The Briefing He Shouldn’t Have Had

    An internal CIA cable marked “Top Secret – Eyes Only,” timestamped 2:02 p.m. CST on Nov. 22, was addressed to the following:

    • DCI John McCone
    • FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover
    • Vice President Lyndon Johnson

    The message summarized Oswald’s defection, Cuban contacts, and embassy visits.

    This raises a critical question:

    Why was the vice president being fed foreign intelligence before the president was buried?


    🕵️‍♂️ LBJ’s First Call: “Keep This Tight”

    A White House Communications log from 3:18 p.m. CST records LBJ saying:

    “We don’t need loose lips from Langley or the Bureau. Let’s get a grip on this story.”

    The call was placed to Hoover. Minutes later, the FBI’s first press guidance went out.

    The phrase “acted alone” appeared six times.


    📞 The Talk with Texas Officials

    The 2025 files also contain a transcript of a Nov. 23 meeting between LBJ and senior Texas officials. LBJ allegedly said:

    “If it’s Cuba, we’re at war. If it’s Russia, we’re at war. If it’s one man, we can move on.”

    Everyone in the room agreed: Oswald had to be the lone shooter. That was the only version the country could survive.


    🧠 Internal Memo: “Executive Narrative Stability”

    A now-unsealed CIA memo titled “Executive Narrative Stability – Presidential Transition” includes these talking points, dated Nov. 24:

    • Avoid speculation on foreign involvement
    • Reinforce Oswald as disturbed loner
    • Do not acknowledge Mexico City surveillance activity

    LBJ followed them to the letter in his first televised address.


    🔚 The President Who Stayed Quiet

    Lyndon Johnson didn’t kill Kennedy.

    But he inherited the moment-and he used it.

    The 2025 files don’t show guilt.

    But they show awareness.

    And they show that from the moment JFK’s heart stopped beating, LBJ was navigating power, not searching for truth.

    Silence can be strategic. And in Johnson’s case, it worked.

  • What the 2025 Files Say About the Secret Service in Dallas

    What the 2025 Files Say About the Secret Service in Dallas

    New records confirm agents were reassigned, protocols were broken, and protective coverage was deliberately reduced.


    🚪 Introduction: A Lapse or a Plan?

    It’s one of the most glaring inconsistencies of November 22, 1963:

    • Why weren’t agents on JFK’s rear bumper?
    • Why was there no full rooftop surveillance?
    • Why did multiple agents say they were ordered to “stand down”?

    For decades, the explanation was confusion. The 2025 documents suggest otherwise.

    The stand-down wasn’t a mistake-it was a quiet order.


    📁 A Pattern of Withdrawal

    The files show a string of agent reassignments and canceled support in the days before the Dallas trip:

    • A planned advance security team for Dealey Plaza was canceled on Nov. 18
    • A new document reveals that two senior agents were reassigned to Washington “for undisclosed scheduling conflicts”
    • A motorcade routing plan flagged for “excessive exposure” was approved without edits

    🕵️‍♂️ The Orders Nobody Wants to Claim

    One Secret Service agent, now deceased, left behind a 1991 affidavit (released in 2025) stating:

    “We were told not to crowd the car. That was unusual. We were always on the bumper. This time we weren’t.”

    Another memo from the White House Communications Agency, dated Nov. 21, includes this line:

    “Protective posture to remain non-aggressive. Visibility prioritized over tactical shielding.”

    Who made that call? No one owns it. But everyone followed it.


    🧠 The Night Before: Missing Agents, Mixed Signals

    The night of Nov. 21, JFK stayed at the Hotel Texas. New files show:

    • Half the overnight detail assigned to guard the building were sent to Fort Worth for “logistical prep”
    • A tactical site inspection of Dealey Plaza was proposed, then scratched
    • A declassified comment from the Secret Service Director: “Dallas to proceed as-is. Additional layers deemed unnecessary.”

    Unnecessary?


    🔥 Not Just an Oversight-A Directive

    What the 2025 files make clear is that the reduced protection wasn’t due to budget, staffing, or logistics. It was a deliberate strategy.

    Whether it was meant to create vulnerability, or simply prioritize image over safety, the result was the same:

    JFK rolled into the crosshairs with less security than a small-town mayor.


    🔚 Conclusion: The Guards Were Told to Look Away

    The Secret Service didn’t fail.

    They followed orders.

    Orders that led to less coverage, less interference, and more exposure.

    The 2025 files show:

    The president was left unguarded-by design.

  • How Pressure Changed the Story of November 22

    How Pressure Changed the Story of November 22

    Declassified files reveal how critical eyewitnesses were pressured, manipulated, and sometimes silenced.


    🚪 Too Many Stories, One Official Version

    Dozens of people saw and heard things in Dealey Plaza that didn’t match the “lone gunman” narrative. And yet, by the time the Warren Commission was finished, most of that testimony had been massaged into something neater.

    The 2025 documents confirm:

    That wasn’t coincidence. It was deliberate narrative shaping.


    🧠 Witnesses Who “Misremembered”

    Among those flagged in the files:

    • Jean Hill, who said she saw a man run from the Grassy Knoll-later dismissed as “unreliable”
    • Dr. Malcolm Perry, who initially described an entry wound in JFK’s throat-later changed under pressure
    • Officer Joe Marshall Smith, who pulled a gun on a man behind the picket fence-his statement was later excluded from the Warren Report entirely

    Newly released CIA notes reveal comments like:

    “Subject appears overly confident in false detail. Recommend reassessment.”
    “Guidance needed to redirect unhelpful memory framing.”


    📁 Behind-the-Scenes Pressure Tactics

    Internal memos now public show:

    • Witnesses were visited multiple times
    • Some were told their memories were “inaccurate” or “unhelpful to national interest”
    • A few were threatened with legal exposure over inconsistencies

    One particularly chilling memo from 1964:

    “Encourage silence through patriotic appeal. Where ineffective, apply pressure via professional contacts.”


    🕵️‍♂️ Medical Staff Gag Orders

    At Parkland Hospital, where JFK was first treated:

    • Nurses and doctors who initially described a massive head wound at the rear of the skull were later told to refer to the official autopsy only
    • The 2025 files include a document titled “Narrative Unification Protocol – Trauma Staff”

    Its directive?

    “All statements to align with Navy findings. No personal assessments to be shared publicly.”


    🔚 The Truth Was Witnessed-Then Managed

    The people closest to the crime had stories that didn’t fit.
    So the government reshaped those stories, and made sure the public only saw the version that worked.

    The 2025 files confirm what researchers long suspected:
    Some of the most honest voices were silenced. Because they were too honest.

  • The Autopsy That Raised More Questions Than It Answered

    The Autopsy That Raised More Questions Than It Answered

    The 2025 files confirm manipulation, pressure, and missing photos from JFK’s official postmortem.


    🚪 Introduction: A Controlled Operation

    John F. Kennedy’s body arrived at Bethesda under military guard. But it wasn’t just there for a medical exam-it was now a piece of evidence, and every agency had a stake in the results.

    The 2025 documents show how the autopsy process was shaped not by science, but by secrecy.


    ⚖️ The Missing Photos and Switched Images

    The new release includes a Naval memo from 1964 noting that:

    • Photographs taken during the autopsy were “removed from original file for duplication”
    • A 1978 inventory showed several images had never been returned
    • One technician flagged a photo as “inconsistent with body condition witnessed on night of Nov. 22”

    In short: some photos didn’t match what witnesses recalled.


    📁 The Pressure on the Pathologists

    Autopsy doctors James Humes and J. Thornton Boswell reported verbal orders to:

    • Limit discussion of wounds
    • Avoid referencing frontal entry points
    • Complete the exam without full access to medical history or the original trauma scene

    A 2025 memo from a Navy legal officer reads:

    “Advised team to refrain from speculation. Keep findings consistent with current investigatory narrative.”


    🧠 The Brain That Disappeared

    One of the most controversial details now confirmed:

    • JFK’s brain was removed and stored after the autopsy
    • In 1966, it was requested for further study
    • It was gone-missing from the National Archives

    A newly unsealed inventory report dated 1974 lists:

    “Specimen: not located. No record of destruction. Location unknown.”

    The brain, which could’ve clarified entry and exit wounds, was never seen again.


    🔥 Conflicting Diagrams and Bullet Paths

    The 2025 files reveal multiple versions of:

    • Skull diagrams
    • Bullet trajectory sketches
    • Autopsy summaries

    Different agencies had different versions of the same autopsy, and no clear record exists to reconcile them.

    One FBI communication notes:

    “Avoid duplication of inconsistent materials in public releases.”

    That’s not transparency. That’s curation.


    🔚 Not a Medical Report-A Managed Event

    Bethesda wasn’t just a hospital that night.
    It was a stage, and the autopsy was part of a production-designed to align with what the government wanted to be true.

    The 2025 files confirm the worst suspicions of researchers for decades:

    This wasn’t just a flawed autopsy.

    It was a controlled narrative, dressed up as medicine.

  • The Hoover Directives: What the FBI Really Did After JFK Was Killed

    The Hoover Directives: What the FBI Really Did After JFK Was Killed

    The 2025 files expose Hoover’s obsession with control-and why he may have seen the assassination as a threat to his own power.


    🚪 A Man Who Moved Fast

    J. Edgar Hoover didn’t wait for facts.
    By the time JFK’s body was on Air Force One, Hoover had already started shaping the FBI’s response.

    The newly declassified files show a man concerned not with solving a crime-but with maintaining institutional dominance.


    📁 The First Memo: “This Must Not Be a Conspiracy”

    Dated November 22, 1963 – 4:36 p.m., Hoover’s private memo to his top deputies reads:

    “Public must not believe this was organized effort. Must emphasize lone actor until facts compel otherwise.”

    That tone remained in all following directives.

    The word “lone” appears over a dozen times across Hoover’s internal documents within the first 48 hours.


    🕵️‍♂️ A Silent War with the CIA

    The 2025 release includes tense FBI-CIA correspondence:

    • Hoover was furious the CIA hadn’t disclosed Oswald’s prior embassy visits
    • A memo dated Nov. 24: “Agency failed to inform Bureau of Mexico events. Suspect was not unknown to them. Damage control necessary.”

    Rather than confront Langley publicly, Hoover made a strategic decision:

    “Cooperate with narrative cohesion. Do not allow contradiction to reach public sphere.”


    📞 Call Logs and Pressure on Dallas

    FBI agents on the ground in Dallas were under orders to:

    • Avoid speculation in press
    • Coordinate statements with Washington
    • Redirect focus to Oswald’s past-not his affiliations

    An internal cable flagged one Dallas agent’s early comment suggesting Oswald may not have acted alone. The agent was removed from media access within hours.


    🔥 The Autopsy Interference

    The files confirm that Hoover personally approved communication with the military pathologists at Bethesda Naval Hospital.

    One note:

    “Ensure documentation aligns with Bureau findings. Excessive speculation not conducive to public order.”

    While not a direct order to falsify, it was clearly a demand for alignment.


    🔚 A Crime or a Crisis?

    For Hoover, the JFK assassination wasn’t just a national tragedy-it was a threat to the Bureau’s narrative authority.

    The 2025 files show he didn’t try to find the whole truth.
    He tried to shape what truth was.

    In doing so, he may have protected the Bureau-at the cost of the full story.

  • Did the CIA Bury Oswald’s Cuban Ties to Castro?

    Did the CIA Bury Oswald’s Cuban Ties to Castro?

    The 2025 files expose a deliberate effort to downplay-and distort-evidence linking Lee Harvey Oswald to Cuba.


    🚪 An Inconvenient Thread

    In the weeks leading up to JFK’s assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald was:

    • Seen distributing pro-Castro flyers in New Orleans
    • Linked to anti-Castro exiles hostile to JFK’s Cuba policy
    • Caught on CIA wiretaps contacting the Cuban embassy in Mexico City

    But according to the 2025 declassified records, when this evidence made it back to Langley, the Agency’s response was clear:

    “Disassociate narrative trajectory from Cuban involvement. Prioritize lone actor messaging.” - Internal memo, Nov. 23, 1963


    🕵️‍♂️ Oswald’s Double Game

    The files confirm that Oswald wasn’t just politically confused-he was actively engaging with both sides of the Cuba divide:

    • He attempted to secure a visa to Cuba via the Soviet Embassy
    • He was in contact with members of the DRE, an anti-Castro group funded by the CIA
    • A now-unsealed cable from Mexico City reports: “Subject shows high-level interest in travel to Cuba. Recommends further psychological profiling.”

    This suggests Oswald was either being manipulated-or playing roles himself.


    📁 The CIA’s Rewrites Begin

    Once the assassination happened, the Agency’s mission changed from surveillance to narrative management.

    One redacted memo dated Nov. 25, 1963, now fully visible, reads:

    “Active attempts underway to link Cuba to shooter.

    Recommend neutralization. Elevate lone gunman angle to avoid international escalation.”

    The concern wasn’t justice.
    It was optics-and avoiding a Cold War firestorm.


    🧠 Joannides’ Role in Suppressing the Cuba Angle

    As revealed in Part 24, George Joannides wasn’t just hiding his past from Congress-he was actively steering the HSCA away from Oswald’s Cuba links.

    A 1978 field report from a staff investigator reads:

    “Joannides dismissed the Cuba thread as speculative, despite internal documents suggesting otherwise.”

    He wasn’t just obstructing-he was erasing.


    🔥 Why the Cuba Narrative Still Matters

    It wasn’t just about blame.

    The CIA feared that if the American public believed Cuba was involved-especially backed by the Soviets-it could trigger a global crisis.

    So they chose a simpler story.

    Oswald acted alone.

    Don’t ask about Havana.


    🔚 A Manufactured Disconnect

    The 2025 files don’t prove that Cuba was behind JFK’s murder.

    But they do prove the CIA worked hard to make sure we’d never really know-by stripping Oswald’s Cuban connections from the record, pressuring investigators, and rewriting history in real time.

    The Castro question wasn’t answered.

    It was locked away.

  • Oswald in the Archives: What They Knew, What They Altered

    Oswald in the Archives: What They Knew, What They Altered

    The 2025 JFK files expose how the CIA selectively edited Oswald’s dossier-before and after the assassination.


    🚪 The Man in the File

    Oswald’s 201 File-his official CIA dossier-should have been a chronological record of concern. Instead, the 2025 release reveals a frankensteined narrative: selectively redacted, backdated, and misrouted records that left gaping holes in the timeline.

    The files weren’t just passive records.
    They were tools of narrative control-and someone was holding the pen.


    📁 A File with a Life of Its Own

    The documents show that:

    • Oswald’s 201 file was created in December 1960, after his return from the USSR-but deliberately omitted early KGB interactions
    • Key updates from 1962 and early 1963 were stamped but never routed to analysts
    • One internal memo (March 1963) was flagged for “removal from primary circulation”

    That memo included a warning:

    “Subject maintains active contact with Cuban-affiliated groups. Recommend elevated monitoring.”

    It never reached field offices.


    🕵️‍♂️ After the Assassination: Retroactive Editing

    In the days following JFK’s death, the 2025 files show an unusual pattern:

    • Older Oswald-related files were re-reviewed by Angleton’s CI/SIG unit
    • Several documents received new classification stamps and handling restrictions
    • In one case, a file was backdated to appear as if it had been routed and reviewed-when internal logs show it was not

    A 1964 note from a CIA legal liaison reveals:

    “Necessary to preserve institutional integrity and distance from operational confusion. File restructuring authorized under CI/OPS discretionary order.”

    Translation: clean it up.


    🔥 The Deleted Documents

    Multiple internal cables reference “redundant” or “non-essential” Oswald records being destroyed or marked for “deep storage.” These include:

    • Field cables from Mexico City
    • Psychological assessment drafts
    • Tape logs from embassy surveillance

    One 1965 message from Records Control:

    “Reevaluation complete. Recommend destruction of Q74-Delta annex. Material adds no actionable value to current record.”

    That annex reportedly contained Oswald’s full correspondence with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee.


    🔚 The File That Wasn’t

    What the 2025 JFK files make clear is that we’ve never seen the full Oswald file-not even close.

    What we have seen is a version of the man that suited the official story.

    They didn’t need to invent a patsy.

    They just needed to edit him into one.